饲粮中添加益生菌对肉鸡生长性能和肉品质的影响,促进肉品安全生产

Md. Sazedul Karim Sarker, M. Rana, S. Sultana, N. R. Sarker, T. N. Nahar
{"title":"饲粮中添加益生菌对肉鸡生长性能和肉品质的影响,促进肉品安全生产","authors":"Md. Sazedul Karim Sarker, M. Rana, S. Sultana, N. R. Sarker, T. N. Nahar","doi":"10.3329/aajfss.v1i1.55761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effect of Probiotic (Biofast) on the growth performance and meat quality of broiler chicken. Ninety six 1-d-old mix sexed Cobb 500 broiler chicks were obtained from a local commercial hatchery. Chicks were randomly allocated in 2 experimental treatments for 5 wk. The experimental treatments received a 1) control, 2) control with probiotic Biofast 0.055% (bacillus subtilis-100%) in the diet. Both treatments had 48 broilers arranged in 4 replicates of 12 broilers each. Eight birds from 2 different groups (one/replication) were sacrificed on termination of the feeding trial of breast, thigh to investigate the meat quality. Feed intake in treatment T1 was significantly (P > 0.05) greater than control in 0 to 3 weeks of age. Though in starter phase treatments failed to induce any marked effects on body weight, weight gain and FCR but numerically increased in T1 than control. In finisher period (4-5 wks), there were no significant differences on body weight, weight gain, feed intake and FCR between the treatments. The organ weight like liver, heart, kidney, spleen, gizzard, abdominal fat and intestine weight also did not show any significant differences between the dietary treatments of control and Biofast. In addition, though the dressing % was not significantly different but numerically higher percentage was found by using Biofast. Similarly, no significant differences (p>0.05) were found in pH, cooking loss, meat color and TBA values between the treatments. In conclusion, supplementation of Biofast in diet has no significant effect on the growth performance of broiler chicks though it has got some positive effects on other parameters that indirectly revealed to enhance meat quality of broiler chicken as well as food safety issues. \nAsian Australas. J. Food Saf. Secur. 2017, 1 (1), 51-57","PeriodicalId":257069,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and Security","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of dietary probiotics on the growth performance, meat quality improvement of broiler chicken for safe meat production\",\"authors\":\"Md. Sazedul Karim Sarker, M. Rana, S. Sultana, N. R. Sarker, T. N. Nahar\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/aajfss.v1i1.55761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effect of Probiotic (Biofast) on the growth performance and meat quality of broiler chicken. Ninety six 1-d-old mix sexed Cobb 500 broiler chicks were obtained from a local commercial hatchery. Chicks were randomly allocated in 2 experimental treatments for 5 wk. The experimental treatments received a 1) control, 2) control with probiotic Biofast 0.055% (bacillus subtilis-100%) in the diet. Both treatments had 48 broilers arranged in 4 replicates of 12 broilers each. Eight birds from 2 different groups (one/replication) were sacrificed on termination of the feeding trial of breast, thigh to investigate the meat quality. Feed intake in treatment T1 was significantly (P > 0.05) greater than control in 0 to 3 weeks of age. Though in starter phase treatments failed to induce any marked effects on body weight, weight gain and FCR but numerically increased in T1 than control. In finisher period (4-5 wks), there were no significant differences on body weight, weight gain, feed intake and FCR between the treatments. The organ weight like liver, heart, kidney, spleen, gizzard, abdominal fat and intestine weight also did not show any significant differences between the dietary treatments of control and Biofast. In addition, though the dressing % was not significantly different but numerically higher percentage was found by using Biofast. Similarly, no significant differences (p>0.05) were found in pH, cooking loss, meat color and TBA values between the treatments. In conclusion, supplementation of Biofast in diet has no significant effect on the growth performance of broiler chicks though it has got some positive effects on other parameters that indirectly revealed to enhance meat quality of broiler chicken as well as food safety issues. \\nAsian Australas. J. Food Saf. Secur. 2017, 1 (1), 51-57\",\"PeriodicalId\":257069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and Security\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/aajfss.v1i1.55761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/aajfss.v1i1.55761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本试验旨在研究益生菌(Biofast)对肉鸡生长性能和肉品质的影响。从当地一家商业孵化场获得96只1龄混合性科布500肉鸡。雏鸡随机分为2个试验处理,试验期5周。试验组设1)对照组,2)饲粮中添加0.055%(枯草芽孢杆菌-100%)益生菌的对照组。2个处理48只肉鸡,随机分成4个重复,每个重复12只。选取2个不同组(1个重复),在胸、大腿饲养试验结束时处死8只,考察肉质。0 ~ 3周龄,处理T1采食量显著(P > 0.05)高于对照组。虽然在起始阶段,处理对体重、增重和FCR没有显著影响,但在T1阶段,处理对体重、增重和FCR的影响明显高于对照组。在育肥期(4 ~ 5周),各处理的体重、增重、采食量和饲料转化率均无显著差异。肝脏、心脏、肾脏、脾脏、砂囊、腹部脂肪和肠道重量在对照组和bifast组之间也没有显著差异。另外,施用Biofast后,处理率虽无显著差异,但数值上较高。pH、蒸煮损失、肉色和TBA值在不同处理间无显著差异(p>0.05)。综上所述,饲粮中添加bifast对肉鸡生长性能无显著影响,但对其他参数有一定的积极影响,间接揭示了提高肉鸡肉品质和食品安全问题。亚洲Australas。J.食品安全。安全,2017,1 (1),51-57
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of dietary probiotics on the growth performance, meat quality improvement of broiler chicken for safe meat production
A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effect of Probiotic (Biofast) on the growth performance and meat quality of broiler chicken. Ninety six 1-d-old mix sexed Cobb 500 broiler chicks were obtained from a local commercial hatchery. Chicks were randomly allocated in 2 experimental treatments for 5 wk. The experimental treatments received a 1) control, 2) control with probiotic Biofast 0.055% (bacillus subtilis-100%) in the diet. Both treatments had 48 broilers arranged in 4 replicates of 12 broilers each. Eight birds from 2 different groups (one/replication) were sacrificed on termination of the feeding trial of breast, thigh to investigate the meat quality. Feed intake in treatment T1 was significantly (P > 0.05) greater than control in 0 to 3 weeks of age. Though in starter phase treatments failed to induce any marked effects on body weight, weight gain and FCR but numerically increased in T1 than control. In finisher period (4-5 wks), there were no significant differences on body weight, weight gain, feed intake and FCR between the treatments. The organ weight like liver, heart, kidney, spleen, gizzard, abdominal fat and intestine weight also did not show any significant differences between the dietary treatments of control and Biofast. In addition, though the dressing % was not significantly different but numerically higher percentage was found by using Biofast. Similarly, no significant differences (p>0.05) were found in pH, cooking loss, meat color and TBA values between the treatments. In conclusion, supplementation of Biofast in diet has no significant effect on the growth performance of broiler chicks though it has got some positive effects on other parameters that indirectly revealed to enhance meat quality of broiler chicken as well as food safety issues. Asian Australas. J. Food Saf. Secur. 2017, 1 (1), 51-57
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adoption and profitability of BARI released garlic varieties in Bangladesh: a farm level study Prevalence, virulence gene profile and antibiogram of Campylobacter jejuni from fresh vegetables in Mymensingh, Bangladesh Quality of peda prepared from mawa with different sugar levels Determination of pre-harvest interval for fenvalerate and acephate in tomato and yard long bean using Gas Chromatography Development of analytical method for pesticide residue determination using LC-MS/MS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1