A. Oliveira, P. Agopian, J. Martino, E. Simoen, C. Claeys, H. Mertens, N. Collaert, A. Thean
{"title":"动态阈值电压对Ge pMOSFET迟滞的影响","authors":"A. Oliveira, P. Agopian, J. Martino, E. Simoen, C. Claeys, H. Mertens, N. Collaert, A. Thean","doi":"10.1109/SBMICRO.2015.7298118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents for the first time an experimental analysis of germanium pMOSFETs operating in conventional, dynamic threshold voltage (DT, where V<sub>BS</sub> = V<sub>GS</sub>) and enhanced dynamic threshold voltage (eDT, where V<sub>BS</sub>=k*V<sub>GS</sub>) modes. In addition, there are two different HfO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> gate stack thicknesses under evaluation. The subthreshold swing (SS) improves 60% in eDT (k = 2) mode compared to the conventional mode (k = 0) thanks to the dynamic threshold voltage reduction. The thinnest Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> layer presents higher drain current hysteresis in the conventional mode and it increases when the channel length decreases. In contrast, the hysteresis effect reduces from 67 mV to lower than 4 mV, i.e. practically minimized when the dynamic threshold voltage is applied.","PeriodicalId":342493,"journal":{"name":"2015 30th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic threshold voltage influence on Ge pMOSFET hysteresis\",\"authors\":\"A. Oliveira, P. Agopian, J. Martino, E. Simoen, C. Claeys, H. Mertens, N. Collaert, A. Thean\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBMICRO.2015.7298118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents for the first time an experimental analysis of germanium pMOSFETs operating in conventional, dynamic threshold voltage (DT, where V<sub>BS</sub> = V<sub>GS</sub>) and enhanced dynamic threshold voltage (eDT, where V<sub>BS</sub>=k*V<sub>GS</sub>) modes. In addition, there are two different HfO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> gate stack thicknesses under evaluation. The subthreshold swing (SS) improves 60% in eDT (k = 2) mode compared to the conventional mode (k = 0) thanks to the dynamic threshold voltage reduction. The thinnest Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> layer presents higher drain current hysteresis in the conventional mode and it increases when the channel length decreases. In contrast, the hysteresis effect reduces from 67 mV to lower than 4 mV, i.e. practically minimized when the dynamic threshold voltage is applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 30th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 30th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBMICRO.2015.7298118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 30th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices (SBMicro)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBMICRO.2015.7298118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dynamic threshold voltage influence on Ge pMOSFET hysteresis
This paper presents for the first time an experimental analysis of germanium pMOSFETs operating in conventional, dynamic threshold voltage (DT, where VBS = VGS) and enhanced dynamic threshold voltage (eDT, where VBS=k*VGS) modes. In addition, there are two different HfO2/Al2O3 gate stack thicknesses under evaluation. The subthreshold swing (SS) improves 60% in eDT (k = 2) mode compared to the conventional mode (k = 0) thanks to the dynamic threshold voltage reduction. The thinnest Al2O3 layer presents higher drain current hysteresis in the conventional mode and it increases when the channel length decreases. In contrast, the hysteresis effect reduces from 67 mV to lower than 4 mV, i.e. practically minimized when the dynamic threshold voltage is applied.