子宫里的胎儿:从神秘到社交媒体

M. Carlyle, Brian C Callender
{"title":"子宫里的胎儿:从神秘到社交媒体","authors":"M. Carlyle, Brian C Callender","doi":"10.1086/703049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"O nce restricted to the privacy of the doctor’s office, ultrasound images of the fetus are now immediately recognizable in the public arena. They are commonplace in advertising and socialmedia, fromprovocative antichoice billboards featuring fetal imagery to Facebook posts tagged “baby’s first pic.” These depictions of the fetus in utero have become iconic and are arguably the most easily recognizedmedical image. How andwhy did this happen?And atwhat price and to what end? This article takes a longue durée historical approach to these questions and explores the complex evolution of the fetal image inWestern Christian culture from the late Middle Ages to the present. We show that before images of the fetus in utero entered the digital age, they had been curated and deployed in three distinctive ways over the past fivehundredyears. The resulting images fed into andwere theproducts of changing approaches to “reproduction.” We understand “reproduction” as both an embodied medical phenomenon and a material technique of image reproduction. Against the backdrop of evolving obstetri-","PeriodicalId":187662,"journal":{"name":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fetus in Utero: From Mystery to Social Media\",\"authors\":\"M. Carlyle, Brian C Callender\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/703049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"O nce restricted to the privacy of the doctor’s office, ultrasound images of the fetus are now immediately recognizable in the public arena. They are commonplace in advertising and socialmedia, fromprovocative antichoice billboards featuring fetal imagery to Facebook posts tagged “baby’s first pic.” These depictions of the fetus in utero have become iconic and are arguably the most easily recognizedmedical image. How andwhy did this happen?And atwhat price and to what end? This article takes a longue durée historical approach to these questions and explores the complex evolution of the fetal image inWestern Christian culture from the late Middle Ages to the present. We show that before images of the fetus in utero entered the digital age, they had been curated and deployed in three distinctive ways over the past fivehundredyears. The resulting images fed into andwere theproducts of changing approaches to “reproduction.” We understand “reproduction” as both an embodied medical phenomenon and a material technique of image reproduction. Against the backdrop of evolving obstetri-\",\"PeriodicalId\":187662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/703049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/703049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

胎儿的超声波图像曾经被限制在医生办公室的隐私范围内,现在在公众场合可以立即识别出来。它们在广告和社交媒体上很常见,从带有胎儿图像的挑衅性反堕胎广告牌,到Facebook上标记为“宝宝的第一张照片”的帖子。这些胎儿在子宫里的描绘已经成为标志性的,可以说是最容易识别的医学图像。这是怎么发生的,为什么会发生?代价是什么,目的又是什么?本文对这些问题采取了长期的历史研究方法,并探讨了从中世纪晚期到现在西方基督教文化中胎儿形象的复杂演变。我们展示了在子宫内胎儿的图像进入数字时代之前,在过去的500年里,它们以三种不同的方式被整理和部署。由此产生的图像输入并成为改变“复制”方法的产物。我们将“复制”理解为一种具体化的医学现象和一种影像复制的物质技术。在不断发展的产科背景下
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fetus in Utero: From Mystery to Social Media
O nce restricted to the privacy of the doctor’s office, ultrasound images of the fetus are now immediately recognizable in the public arena. They are commonplace in advertising and socialmedia, fromprovocative antichoice billboards featuring fetal imagery to Facebook posts tagged “baby’s first pic.” These depictions of the fetus in utero have become iconic and are arguably the most easily recognizedmedical image. How andwhy did this happen?And atwhat price and to what end? This article takes a longue durée historical approach to these questions and explores the complex evolution of the fetal image inWestern Christian culture from the late Middle Ages to the present. We show that before images of the fetus in utero entered the digital age, they had been curated and deployed in three distinctive ways over the past fivehundredyears. The resulting images fed into andwere theproducts of changing approaches to “reproduction.” We understand “reproduction” as both an embodied medical phenomenon and a material technique of image reproduction. Against the backdrop of evolving obstetri-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transcreation and Postcolonial Knowledge Chomsky versus Foucault, and the Problem of Knowledge in Translation When Dragons Show Themselves: Research, Constructing Knowledge, and the Practice of Translation A Critique of Provincial Reason: Situated Cosmopolitanisms and the Infrastructures of Theoretical Translation Translation and the Archive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1