公共卫生政治

Kaitlyn McBride, L. Rosenstock
{"title":"公共卫生政治","authors":"Kaitlyn McBride, L. Rosenstock","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of public health is to improve and protect individuals and their communities, as well as promote evidence-based policy to drive decision-making across the larger health system. Researchers in academic institutions, government agencies, and the private sector provide the science to help policymakers make evidence-based health policy decisions, such as interventions to increase smoking cessation, or policies to improve access to preventive care services. In an ideal world, science (or evidence) drives policy, with politics playing a minimal or enabling role. However, this formula recognizes that public health policy is not only decided based on science (or evidence), but science itself is increasingly vulnerable to the political process, and to attacks by a wide array of players (e.g. politicians, industry leaders, and interest groups) that have vested interests to undermine scientific evidence in order to thwart the actions that would credibly follow that knowledge. Put differently, politics are key—and can be systematically analysed—in advancing or thwarting evidence-based policy.","PeriodicalId":206715,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health","volume":"2446 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics of public health\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn McBride, L. Rosenstock\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of public health is to improve and protect individuals and their communities, as well as promote evidence-based policy to drive decision-making across the larger health system. Researchers in academic institutions, government agencies, and the private sector provide the science to help policymakers make evidence-based health policy decisions, such as interventions to increase smoking cessation, or policies to improve access to preventive care services. In an ideal world, science (or evidence) drives policy, with politics playing a minimal or enabling role. However, this formula recognizes that public health policy is not only decided based on science (or evidence), but science itself is increasingly vulnerable to the political process, and to attacks by a wide array of players (e.g. politicians, industry leaders, and interest groups) that have vested interests to undermine scientific evidence in order to thwart the actions that would credibly follow that knowledge. Put differently, politics are key—and can be systematically analysed—in advancing or thwarting evidence-based policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"2446 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共卫生的目标是改善和保护个人及其社区,并促进以证据为基础的政策,以推动整个卫生系统的决策。学术机构、政府机构和私营部门的研究人员提供科学,以帮助决策者做出基于证据的卫生政策决定,例如增加戒烟的干预措施,或改善获得预防性保健服务的政策。在一个理想的世界里,科学(或证据)驱动政策,政治发挥最小的或促成的作用。然而,这一公式认识到,公共卫生政策不仅是根据科学(或证据)决定的,而且科学本身越来越容易受到政治进程的影响,也越来越容易受到各种参与者(如政治家、行业领袖和利益集团)的攻击,这些参与者拥有破坏科学证据的既得利益,以阻碍可信地遵循这些知识的行动。换句话说,在推进或阻碍基于证据的政策方面,政治是关键,也可以被系统地分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Politics of public health
The aim of public health is to improve and protect individuals and their communities, as well as promote evidence-based policy to drive decision-making across the larger health system. Researchers in academic institutions, government agencies, and the private sector provide the science to help policymakers make evidence-based health policy decisions, such as interventions to increase smoking cessation, or policies to improve access to preventive care services. In an ideal world, science (or evidence) drives policy, with politics playing a minimal or enabling role. However, this formula recognizes that public health policy is not only decided based on science (or evidence), but science itself is increasingly vulnerable to the political process, and to attacks by a wide array of players (e.g. politicians, industry leaders, and interest groups) that have vested interests to undermine scientific evidence in order to thwart the actions that would credibly follow that knowledge. Put differently, politics are key—and can be systematically analysed—in advancing or thwarting evidence-based policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health policy in developing countries Prisoners Tobacco Behavioural determinants of health and disease Medical screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1