南非漫长的二十世纪中的亚非邻接

Mingwei Huang
{"title":"南非漫长的二十世纪中的亚非邻接","authors":"Mingwei Huang","doi":"10.1353/vrg.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In South Africa and beyond, Chinese and Indian indenture and diasporas have been rarely examined comparatively, and their racialization even less. Drawing from archival research and ethnographic fieldwork in Johannesburg, this essay illuminates the coeval migratory paths and racialization processes of Chinese and Indian peoples over South Africa's long twentieth century (1860 to present). I theorize the enduring logics, forms, and adjacencies of Asian racialization. Adjacency names a proximate relation of Chinese and Indians appearing side by side in archives, overlapping migrations, and fraught intimacies. Adjacency characterizes their categorical proximity as \"Asian,\" \"Asiatic,\" and \"Coolie\" in relation to \"Black\" and \"white,\" and the irreducible gap of difference. The essay offers a framework for locating Afro-Asian formations at the interstices of China-Africa, Afro-Asian, and Indian Ocean studies.","PeriodicalId":263014,"journal":{"name":"Verge: Studies in Global Asias","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afro-Asian Adjacencies in South Africa's Long Twentieth Century\",\"authors\":\"Mingwei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vrg.2022.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In South Africa and beyond, Chinese and Indian indenture and diasporas have been rarely examined comparatively, and their racialization even less. Drawing from archival research and ethnographic fieldwork in Johannesburg, this essay illuminates the coeval migratory paths and racialization processes of Chinese and Indian peoples over South Africa's long twentieth century (1860 to present). I theorize the enduring logics, forms, and adjacencies of Asian racialization. Adjacency names a proximate relation of Chinese and Indians appearing side by side in archives, overlapping migrations, and fraught intimacies. Adjacency characterizes their categorical proximity as \\\"Asian,\\\" \\\"Asiatic,\\\" and \\\"Coolie\\\" in relation to \\\"Black\\\" and \\\"white,\\\" and the irreducible gap of difference. The essay offers a framework for locating Afro-Asian formations at the interstices of China-Africa, Afro-Asian, and Indian Ocean studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Verge: Studies in Global Asias\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Verge: Studies in Global Asias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2022.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verge: Studies in Global Asias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在南非及其他地区,中国和印度的契约和移民很少被比较研究,他们的种族化就更少了。从档案研究和约翰内斯堡的民族志田野调查中,本文阐明了中国和印度人民在南非漫长的20世纪(1860年至今)的同时期迁徙路径和种族化过程。我将亚洲种族化的持久逻辑、形式和邻接性理论化。“邻接”指的是中国人和印度人在档案中并排出现的近似关系,重叠的迁移,以及令人担忧的亲密关系。邻接的特点是他们的分类接近为“亚洲人”,“亚洲人”和“苦力”相对于“黑人”和“白人”,以及差异的不可缩小的差距。本文为在中非、亚非和印度洋研究的间隙定位亚非地层提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Afro-Asian Adjacencies in South Africa's Long Twentieth Century
Abstract:In South Africa and beyond, Chinese and Indian indenture and diasporas have been rarely examined comparatively, and their racialization even less. Drawing from archival research and ethnographic fieldwork in Johannesburg, this essay illuminates the coeval migratory paths and racialization processes of Chinese and Indian peoples over South Africa's long twentieth century (1860 to present). I theorize the enduring logics, forms, and adjacencies of Asian racialization. Adjacency names a proximate relation of Chinese and Indians appearing side by side in archives, overlapping migrations, and fraught intimacies. Adjacency characterizes their categorical proximity as "Asian," "Asiatic," and "Coolie" in relation to "Black" and "white," and the irreducible gap of difference. The essay offers a framework for locating Afro-Asian formations at the interstices of China-Africa, Afro-Asian, and Indian Ocean studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Economies of Brown Salvation: Impoverishment, Assimilationist Imaginaries, and Dominant-Caste Capture The Possibilities and Limits of Brown/ness(es) Indenture, Iteration: Race and the Aesthetics of Contract Labor Making Brown/ness(es): Aesthetics in the Everyday Feeling Brown, Thinking Black: Translating the Black Panther from Lowndes to Bombay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1