{"title":"低功率缓存的解析能量耗散模型","authors":"M. Kamble, K. Ghose","doi":"10.1109/LPE.1997.621264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present detailed analytical models for estimating the energy dissipation in conventional caches as well as low energy cache architectures. The analytical models use the run time statistics such as hit/miss counts, fraction of read/write requests and assume stochastical distributions for signal values. These models are validated by comparing the power estimated using these models against the power estimated using a detailed simulator called CAPE (CAache Power Estimator). The analytical models for conventional caches are found to be accurate to within 2% error. However, these analytical models over-predict the dissipations of low-power caches by as much as 30%. The inaccuracies can be attributed to correlated signal values and locality of reference, both of which are exploited in making some cache organizations energy efficient.","PeriodicalId":334688,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"111","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical energy dissipation models for low power caches\",\"authors\":\"M. Kamble, K. Ghose\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LPE.1997.621264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present detailed analytical models for estimating the energy dissipation in conventional caches as well as low energy cache architectures. The analytical models use the run time statistics such as hit/miss counts, fraction of read/write requests and assume stochastical distributions for signal values. These models are validated by comparing the power estimated using these models against the power estimated using a detailed simulator called CAPE (CAache Power Estimator). The analytical models for conventional caches are found to be accurate to within 2% error. However, these analytical models over-predict the dissipations of low-power caches by as much as 30%. The inaccuracies can be attributed to correlated signal values and locality of reference, both of which are exploited in making some cache organizations energy efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design\",\"volume\":\"20 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"111\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LPE.1997.621264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1997 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LPE.1997.621264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 111
摘要
我们提出了详细的分析模型来估计传统缓存和低能量缓存架构的能量耗散。分析模型使用运行时统计数据,如命中/未命中计数、读/写请求的比例,并假设信号值的随机分布。通过比较使用这些模型估计的功率与使用称为CAPE (CAache power Estimator)的详细模拟器估计的功率来验证这些模型。结果表明,常规贮藏物的分析模型误差在2%以内。然而,这些分析模型高估了低功耗缓存的耗散高达30%。不准确性可归因于相关信号值和参考的局部性,这两者都被用于使一些缓存组织节能。
Analytical energy dissipation models for low power caches
We present detailed analytical models for estimating the energy dissipation in conventional caches as well as low energy cache architectures. The analytical models use the run time statistics such as hit/miss counts, fraction of read/write requests and assume stochastical distributions for signal values. These models are validated by comparing the power estimated using these models against the power estimated using a detailed simulator called CAPE (CAache Power Estimator). The analytical models for conventional caches are found to be accurate to within 2% error. However, these analytical models over-predict the dissipations of low-power caches by as much as 30%. The inaccuracies can be attributed to correlated signal values and locality of reference, both of which are exploited in making some cache organizations energy efficient.