谨慎处理:利用公司层面的排放数据评估气候变化带来的金融风险的挑战与机遇

A. Bajić, Ruediger Kiesel, M. Hellmich
{"title":"谨慎处理:利用公司层面的排放数据评估气候变化带来的金融风险的挑战与机遇","authors":"A. Bajić, Ruediger Kiesel, M. Hellmich","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3789928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By now climate change has a substantial impact on financial markets and risks related to it have to be analysed. Besides the physical risk imposed by extreme weather conditions, companies face transition risks as economies are rebuilding on a low-carbon basis. To assess the impact on individual companies reliable data are necessary. Currently, by far most-used data relate to the carbon emissions of firms. By analysing a large data set on company-level carbon emissions we identify several sources of data fault which have to be considered in any data-intensive analysis. We show that year-by-year analysis of company emission consistency is best to find data flaws. Also, we find that economic and carbon data are not perfectly synchronized. Our analysis indicates that the widespread use of winsorizing is not enough to remove data flaws. Also, alternative emission measures do not provide robustness of results as they tend to suffer from the same flaws. As providers update carbon data on an ad-hoc basis, the previous analysis may not be repeated unless the data set on which it was based is saved. Our findings serve as a warning for the reliability of (academic) analysis and highlight the possible impact of bad data quality on algorithmic approaches to company-level emission data.","PeriodicalId":251522,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handle with Care: Challenges and Opportunities of using Company-Level Emissions Data for Assessing Financial Risks from Climate Change\",\"authors\":\"A. Bajić, Ruediger Kiesel, M. Hellmich\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3789928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By now climate change has a substantial impact on financial markets and risks related to it have to be analysed. Besides the physical risk imposed by extreme weather conditions, companies face transition risks as economies are rebuilding on a low-carbon basis. To assess the impact on individual companies reliable data are necessary. Currently, by far most-used data relate to the carbon emissions of firms. By analysing a large data set on company-level carbon emissions we identify several sources of data fault which have to be considered in any data-intensive analysis. We show that year-by-year analysis of company emission consistency is best to find data flaws. Also, we find that economic and carbon data are not perfectly synchronized. Our analysis indicates that the widespread use of winsorizing is not enough to remove data flaws. Also, alternative emission measures do not provide robustness of results as they tend to suffer from the same flaws. As providers update carbon data on an ad-hoc basis, the previous analysis may not be repeated unless the data set on which it was based is saved. Our findings serve as a warning for the reliability of (academic) analysis and highlight the possible impact of bad data quality on algorithmic approaches to company-level emission data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

到目前为止,气候变化对金融市场产生了重大影响,必须对与之相关的风险进行分析。除了极端天气条件带来的物理风险外,随着经济在低碳基础上重建,企业还面临转型风险。要评估对个别公司的影响,可靠的数据是必要的。目前,最常用的数据与企业的碳排放有关。通过分析公司层面碳排放的大型数据集,我们确定了在任何数据密集型分析中必须考虑的数据错误的几个来源。我们发现,对公司排放一致性的逐年分析最能发现数据缺陷。此外,我们发现经济和碳数据并不完全同步。我们的分析表明,winsorization的广泛使用不足以消除数据缺陷。此外,替代排放措施也不能提供结果的稳健性,因为它们往往存在同样的缺陷。由于供应商会在特定的基础上更新碳数据,除非保存了其所依据的数据集,否则之前的分析可能不会重复。我们的研究结果对(学术)分析的可靠性提出了警告,并强调了不良数据质量对公司层面排放数据算法方法的可能影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Handle with Care: Challenges and Opportunities of using Company-Level Emissions Data for Assessing Financial Risks from Climate Change
By now climate change has a substantial impact on financial markets and risks related to it have to be analysed. Besides the physical risk imposed by extreme weather conditions, companies face transition risks as economies are rebuilding on a low-carbon basis. To assess the impact on individual companies reliable data are necessary. Currently, by far most-used data relate to the carbon emissions of firms. By analysing a large data set on company-level carbon emissions we identify several sources of data fault which have to be considered in any data-intensive analysis. We show that year-by-year analysis of company emission consistency is best to find data flaws. Also, we find that economic and carbon data are not perfectly synchronized. Our analysis indicates that the widespread use of winsorizing is not enough to remove data flaws. Also, alternative emission measures do not provide robustness of results as they tend to suffer from the same flaws. As providers update carbon data on an ad-hoc basis, the previous analysis may not be repeated unless the data set on which it was based is saved. Our findings serve as a warning for the reliability of (academic) analysis and highlight the possible impact of bad data quality on algorithmic approaches to company-level emission data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
XVA Estimates with Empirical Martingale Simulation Marginals Versus Copulas: Which Account For More Model Risk In Multivariate Risk Forecasting? Sensitivities-Based Method and Expected Shortfall for Market Risk Under FRTB and Its Impact on Options Risk Capital A 2-Factor model for inclusion of Voluntary Termination Risk in Automotive Retail Loan Portfolios Lessons from Estimating the Average Option-implied Volatility Term Structure for the Spanish Banking Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1