{"title":"各种轮循调度算法的比较","authors":"Ankush Joshi, S. Goyal","doi":"10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In last ten to fifteen years lots of improved and transformed forms of RR Scheduling have been created to overcome some of issues which were available in the standard RR Scheduling. When these transformed versions were given by various scientists and researchers, these algorithms were always compared with the standard Round Robin Algorithm to make sure that the improved version is better than the standard algorithm. In this research paper we tried to draw comparison between various improved versions of round robin algorithm and analyze their average waiting time, average turnaround times and context switches, to check which one improved version would be able to suggest a fruitful modification over the original one.","PeriodicalId":328124,"journal":{"name":"2019 8th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)","volume":"233 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Various Round Robin Scheduling Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Ankush Joshi, S. Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In last ten to fifteen years lots of improved and transformed forms of RR Scheduling have been created to overcome some of issues which were available in the standard RR Scheduling. When these transformed versions were given by various scientists and researchers, these algorithms were always compared with the standard Round Robin Algorithm to make sure that the improved version is better than the standard algorithm. In this research paper we tried to draw comparison between various improved versions of round robin algorithm and analyze their average waiting time, average turnaround times and context switches, to check which one improved version would be able to suggest a fruitful modification over the original one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 8th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)\",\"volume\":\"233 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 8th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 8th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART46866.2019.9117345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十到十五年中,为了克服标准调度中存在的一些问题,已经创建了许多改进和转换的调度形式。当各种科学家和研究人员给出这些改进版本时,这些算法总是与标准轮询算法进行比较,以确保改进版本比标准算法更好。在这篇研究论文中,我们试图对各种改进版本的轮循算法进行比较,并分析它们的平均等待时间、平均周转时间和上下文切换,以检查哪一个改进版本能够提出比原始版本更有效的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Various Round Robin Scheduling Algorithms
In last ten to fifteen years lots of improved and transformed forms of RR Scheduling have been created to overcome some of issues which were available in the standard RR Scheduling. When these transformed versions were given by various scientists and researchers, these algorithms were always compared with the standard Round Robin Algorithm to make sure that the improved version is better than the standard algorithm. In this research paper we tried to draw comparison between various improved versions of round robin algorithm and analyze their average waiting time, average turnaround times and context switches, to check which one improved version would be able to suggest a fruitful modification over the original one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Link Converter based Scheme of Harmonic Filtration for Non-Linear Load A Conceptual Design to Encourage Sustainable Grocery Shopping: A Perspective in Bangladesh Plant Diseases Recognition Using Machine Learning Implementation of Machine Learning to Detect Hate Speech in Bangla Language Role of Internet of Things in Shaping Cities of Rajasthan as Smart Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1