相声的保守代理模型及其在不确定性量化中的应用

P. Manfredi
{"title":"相声的保守代理模型及其在不确定性量化中的应用","authors":"P. Manfredi","doi":"10.1109/SPI57109.2023.10145575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning methods are attracting a great interest as surrogate modeling tools for signal and power integrity problems. However, an open issue is that it is often difficult to assess the model trustworthiness in generalizing beyond the training data. In this regard, Gaussian process (GP) models notably provide an indication of the prediction confidence due to the limited amount of training samples. They are wildly used as surrogates in design exploration, optimization, and uncertainty quantification tasks. Nevertheless, their prediction confidence does not account for the uncertainty introduced by the estimation of the GP parameters, which is also part of the training process. In this paper, we discuss two improved GP formulations that take into account the additional uncertainty related to the estimation of (some) GP parameters, thereby leading to more reliable and conservative confidence levels. The proposed framework is applied to the uncertainty quantification of the maximum transient crosstalk in a microstrip interconnect.","PeriodicalId":281134,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 27th Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative Surrogate Modeling of Crosstalk with Application to Uncertainty Quantification\",\"authors\":\"P. Manfredi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPI57109.2023.10145575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Machine learning methods are attracting a great interest as surrogate modeling tools for signal and power integrity problems. However, an open issue is that it is often difficult to assess the model trustworthiness in generalizing beyond the training data. In this regard, Gaussian process (GP) models notably provide an indication of the prediction confidence due to the limited amount of training samples. They are wildly used as surrogates in design exploration, optimization, and uncertainty quantification tasks. Nevertheless, their prediction confidence does not account for the uncertainty introduced by the estimation of the GP parameters, which is also part of the training process. In this paper, we discuss two improved GP formulations that take into account the additional uncertainty related to the estimation of (some) GP parameters, thereby leading to more reliable and conservative confidence levels. The proposed framework is applied to the uncertainty quantification of the maximum transient crosstalk in a microstrip interconnect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 27th Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 27th Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPI57109.2023.10145575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 27th Workshop on Signal and Power Integrity (SPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPI57109.2023.10145575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习方法作为信号和电源完整性问题的替代建模工具引起了人们的极大兴趣。然而,一个悬而未决的问题是,在泛化训练数据之外,通常很难评估模型的可信度。在这方面,由于训练样本数量有限,高斯过程(GP)模型显著地提供了预测置信度的指示。它们被广泛地用作设计探索、优化和不确定性量化任务的替代品。然而,他们的预测置信度并没有考虑到GP参数估计所带来的不确定性,这也是训练过程的一部分。在本文中,我们讨论了两种改进的GP公式,它们考虑了与(某些)GP参数估计相关的额外不确定性,从而导致更可靠和保守的置信水平。将该框架应用于微带互连中最大瞬态串扰的不确定性量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservative Surrogate Modeling of Crosstalk with Application to Uncertainty Quantification
Machine learning methods are attracting a great interest as surrogate modeling tools for signal and power integrity problems. However, an open issue is that it is often difficult to assess the model trustworthiness in generalizing beyond the training data. In this regard, Gaussian process (GP) models notably provide an indication of the prediction confidence due to the limited amount of training samples. They are wildly used as surrogates in design exploration, optimization, and uncertainty quantification tasks. Nevertheless, their prediction confidence does not account for the uncertainty introduced by the estimation of the GP parameters, which is also part of the training process. In this paper, we discuss two improved GP formulations that take into account the additional uncertainty related to the estimation of (some) GP parameters, thereby leading to more reliable and conservative confidence levels. The proposed framework is applied to the uncertainty quantification of the maximum transient crosstalk in a microstrip interconnect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bandwidth Limits of Connector Wipe Stub for Reliable 224 Gbps Signaling Variability-Aware Modeling of Supply Induced Jitter in CMOS Inverters A Structured Krylov Subspace Projection Framework for Fast Power Integrity Verification Signal Integrity Analysis of Coupled Thin-Film Microstrip Lines (TFMSLs) Routing Length Impact on Differential Via Crosstalk Cancellation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1