独立机构公职人员对非法决定的责任,以捷克电视委员会为例

M. Štefko
{"title":"独立机构公职人员对非法决定的责任,以捷克电视委员会为例","authors":"M. Štefko","doi":"10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/1/50-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to analyse the appropriateness of the legislative regulation of the protection of a member of an independent administrative body exercising public oversight over a certain agenda or institution in the event that it makes an illegal or factually incorrect decision, in terms of the practical problems that this regulation raises. Put simply, it is a question of who is watching the watchdog. If the gatekeeper is complicit in an illegal decision or maladministration, who will drive him or her to seek justice? And is the protection of the holder of a public office sufficient? The research will be conducted on an illegal decision of the Czech Television Council that has been subject to judicial review by the Czech administrative courts.","PeriodicalId":406988,"journal":{"name":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liability of the Holder of a Public Office in an Independent Body for Unlawful Decisions, Using the Example of the Czech Television Council\",\"authors\":\"M. Štefko\",\"doi\":\"10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/1/50-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to analyse the appropriateness of the legislative regulation of the protection of a member of an independent administrative body exercising public oversight over a certain agenda or institution in the event that it makes an illegal or factually incorrect decision, in terms of the practical problems that this regulation raises. Put simply, it is a question of who is watching the watchdog. If the gatekeeper is complicit in an illegal decision or maladministration, who will drive him or her to seek justice? And is the protection of the holder of a public office sufficient? The research will be conducted on an illegal decision of the Czech Television Council that has been subject to judicial review by the Czech administrative courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Societas et Iurisprudentia\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Societas et Iurisprudentia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/1/50-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/1/50-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析在独立行政机构成员对某一议程或机构作出非法或事实上不正确的决定时,对其行使公共监督的立法规定的适当性,根据这一规定提出的实际问题。简而言之,这是一个谁在监视看门狗的问题。如果看门人参与了非法决策或管理不善,谁会驱使他或她寻求正义?对公职人员的保护是否足够?这项研究将针对捷克电视委员会的一项非法决定进行,该决定已受到捷克行政法院的司法审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liability of the Holder of a Public Office in an Independent Body for Unlawful Decisions, Using the Example of the Czech Television Council
The aim of this paper is to analyse the appropriateness of the legislative regulation of the protection of a member of an independent administrative body exercising public oversight over a certain agenda or institution in the event that it makes an illegal or factually incorrect decision, in terms of the practical problems that this regulation raises. Put simply, it is a question of who is watching the watchdog. If the gatekeeper is complicit in an illegal decision or maladministration, who will drive him or her to seek justice? And is the protection of the holder of a public office sufficient? The research will be conducted on an illegal decision of the Czech Television Council that has been subject to judicial review by the Czech administrative courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation of Unfair Contract Terms in Central and Eastern European Countries The Absence of the Employee due to the Medical or Diagnostic Examination of His or Her Child Between Scylla and Charybdis – Lawyers of the High Judge Conference in 1861 Occupational Accident and Occupational Disease as an Obstacle to Work on the Employee’s Side – the Czech Perspective Polish-German Dispute over WWII Reparations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1