OpenFOAM环境下数值波槽实验的叠置网格法性能评价

C. Windt, J. Davidson, Benazzou Akram, J. Ringwood
{"title":"OpenFOAM环境下数值波槽实验的叠置网格法性能评价","authors":"C. Windt, J. Davidson, Benazzou Akram, J. Ringwood","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2018-77564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To maximise the energy output of wave energy converters (WECs), large structural motions are desired. When simulating WEC performance in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based numerical wave tanks, these motions must be explicitly accommodated in the computational domain. Using well established mesh morphing (MM) methods, this explicit accommodation results in deformation of control volumes (CVs)/mesh. Thus, large amplitude WEC oscillations may lead to highly distorted CVs and push MM models beyond the limits of numerical stability. While advanced numerical mesh motion methods, such as overset grids, have been developed in commercial CFD codes to overcome these issues, little use of these methods can be found in WEC analysis. However, recently the overset grid method (OSG) has been made available to a wider user community through its release in the open source CFD environment OpenFOAM [1,2]. To evaluate the performance of the OSG, this paper will compare the classical MM method and the OSG against experimental tank test data of the WaveStar device [3].","PeriodicalId":306681,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Assessment of the Overset Grid Method for Numerical Wave Tank Experiments in the OpenFOAM Environment\",\"authors\":\"C. Windt, J. Davidson, Benazzou Akram, J. Ringwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/OMAE2018-77564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To maximise the energy output of wave energy converters (WECs), large structural motions are desired. When simulating WEC performance in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based numerical wave tanks, these motions must be explicitly accommodated in the computational domain. Using well established mesh morphing (MM) methods, this explicit accommodation results in deformation of control volumes (CVs)/mesh. Thus, large amplitude WEC oscillations may lead to highly distorted CVs and push MM models beyond the limits of numerical stability. While advanced numerical mesh motion methods, such as overset grids, have been developed in commercial CFD codes to overcome these issues, little use of these methods can be found in WEC analysis. However, recently the overset grid method (OSG) has been made available to a wider user community through its release in the open source CFD environment OpenFOAM [1,2]. To evaluate the performance of the OSG, this paper will compare the classical MM method and the OSG against experimental tank test data of the WaveStar device [3].\",\"PeriodicalId\":306681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

为了最大限度地提高波浪能转换器(WECs)的能量输出,需要大的结构运动。在基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的数值波槽中模拟WEC性能时,必须明确地将这些运动纳入计算域。使用完善的网格变形(MM)方法,这种明确的调节导致控制体积(cv)/网格的变形。因此,大振幅WEC振荡可能导致高度扭曲的cv,并使MM模型超出数值稳定性的极限。虽然先进的数值网格运动方法,如覆盖网格,已经在商业CFD代码中开发,以克服这些问题,但这些方法在WEC分析中很少使用。然而,最近,偏移网格方法(OSG)通过其在开源CFD环境OpenFOAM中的发布已经提供给更广泛的用户社区[1,2]。为了评估OSG的性能,本文将对比经典MM法和OSG与WaveStar装置的实验槽试验数据[3]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Assessment of the Overset Grid Method for Numerical Wave Tank Experiments in the OpenFOAM Environment
To maximise the energy output of wave energy converters (WECs), large structural motions are desired. When simulating WEC performance in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based numerical wave tanks, these motions must be explicitly accommodated in the computational domain. Using well established mesh morphing (MM) methods, this explicit accommodation results in deformation of control volumes (CVs)/mesh. Thus, large amplitude WEC oscillations may lead to highly distorted CVs and push MM models beyond the limits of numerical stability. While advanced numerical mesh motion methods, such as overset grids, have been developed in commercial CFD codes to overcome these issues, little use of these methods can be found in WEC analysis. However, recently the overset grid method (OSG) has been made available to a wider user community through its release in the open source CFD environment OpenFOAM [1,2]. To evaluate the performance of the OSG, this paper will compare the classical MM method and the OSG against experimental tank test data of the WaveStar device [3].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FIV Energy Harvesting From Sharp-Edge Oscillators On Design and Analysis of a Drivetrain Test Rig for Wind Turbine Health Monitoring The Influence of Tidal Unsteadiness on a Tidal Turbine Blade Flow-Induced Vibration Learning a Predictionless Resonating Controller for Wave Energy Converters Performance of a Passive Tuned Liquid Column Damper for Floating Wind Turbines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1