消费者对社交媒体负面帖子的信任与受欢迎程度——基于B2C与C2C商业模式融合的案例研究

Sinan S. AlSheikh, K. Shaalan, F. Meziane
{"title":"消费者对社交媒体负面帖子的信任与受欢迎程度——基于B2C与C2C商业模式融合的案例研究","authors":"Sinan S. AlSheikh, K. Shaalan, F. Meziane","doi":"10.1109/BESC.2017.8256364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust can be defined as the vulnerability of trustor towards trustee to meet certain expectations. This paper extends the definition of trust to cover digital world and illustrate the trust model used by most of nowadays online stores. The social media sentiment analysis revealed the sentiments of customers towards traditional Business-to-Consumer (B2C) stores vs modern Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C) market places. Sentiment analysis was performed across multiple industry's like Taxi, hospitality, and online retail industry. The popularity of Negative sentiments was higher towards most of modern C2C market places compared to traditional B2C stores. The popularity of negative posts was linked with the consumers' trust towards the C2C market place offering. However, few C2C companies managed to maintain a high positive posts ration and sometimes they were better than traditional B2C business. Uber and AirBnB surprisingly were not on the top.","PeriodicalId":142098,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers' trust and popularity of negative posts in social media: A case study on the integration between B2C and C2C business models\",\"authors\":\"Sinan S. AlSheikh, K. Shaalan, F. Meziane\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BESC.2017.8256364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trust can be defined as the vulnerability of trustor towards trustee to meet certain expectations. This paper extends the definition of trust to cover digital world and illustrate the trust model used by most of nowadays online stores. The social media sentiment analysis revealed the sentiments of customers towards traditional Business-to-Consumer (B2C) stores vs modern Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C) market places. Sentiment analysis was performed across multiple industry's like Taxi, hospitality, and online retail industry. The popularity of Negative sentiments was higher towards most of modern C2C market places compared to traditional B2C stores. The popularity of negative posts was linked with the consumers' trust towards the C2C market place offering. However, few C2C companies managed to maintain a high positive posts ration and sometimes they were better than traditional B2C business. Uber and AirBnB surprisingly were not on the top.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BESC.2017.8256364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BESC.2017.8256364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

信任可以定义为委托人为了满足某种期望而对被委托人的脆弱性。本文将信任的定义扩展到数字世界,并举例说明了目前大多数在线商店使用的信任模型。社交媒体情绪分析揭示了顾客对传统B2C商店和现代C2C市场的看法。情绪分析是在多个行业进行的,如出租车、酒店和在线零售行业。与传统的B2C商店相比,对大多数现代C2C市场的负面情绪的普及程度更高。负面帖子的受欢迎程度与消费者对C2C市场提供的信任有关。然而,很少有C2C公司能够保持较高的正面职位比率,有时他们比传统的B2C业务更好。令人惊讶的是,优步和爱彼迎并未名列前茅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumers' trust and popularity of negative posts in social media: A case study on the integration between B2C and C2C business models
Trust can be defined as the vulnerability of trustor towards trustee to meet certain expectations. This paper extends the definition of trust to cover digital world and illustrate the trust model used by most of nowadays online stores. The social media sentiment analysis revealed the sentiments of customers towards traditional Business-to-Consumer (B2C) stores vs modern Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C) market places. Sentiment analysis was performed across multiple industry's like Taxi, hospitality, and online retail industry. The popularity of Negative sentiments was higher towards most of modern C2C market places compared to traditional B2C stores. The popularity of negative posts was linked with the consumers' trust towards the C2C market place offering. However, few C2C companies managed to maintain a high positive posts ration and sometimes they were better than traditional B2C business. Uber and AirBnB surprisingly were not on the top.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IBM data governance solutions Causalities among momentum, transparency and media in China Can Bayesian poisson tensor factorization automatically extract interesting events from massive media reports? The influence of big data and informatization on tourism industry Discover social relations and activities from ancient Chinese history book Zuo Zhuan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1