Szymon Wit, Paweł Więch, Marta Kłęk, Marek Muster, Grzegorz Kucaba
{"title":"护理人员声门上气道管理的有效性","authors":"Szymon Wit, Paweł Więch, Marta Kłęk, Marek Muster, Grzegorz Kucaba","doi":"10.36740/emems202103105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supraglottic airways management by paramedics using selected methods in simulated conditions.\nMaterial and methods: The study included a group of 115 professionally active paramedics working in various health care facilities in the Podkarpackie Province. Each subject was asked to open the airways using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and a disposable laryngeal tube (LT-D) in simulated conditions. The study assessed the effectiveness of the airway opening taking into account: average tidal volume of a single breath in ml, average minute tidal volume in ml, time of insertion in seconds, the need for a second attempt, pressure on incisors in N. The obtained results were statistically analysed, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The calculations were performed with the SPSS 20 software.\nresults: The study showed that the time of inserting of LT-D is the same as the time of LMA (LT-D: 25.95s ± 7.89s vs. LMA: 24.78s ± 8.32s; p>0.05). The mean tidal volume of a single breath was significantly higher with the LMA com-pared to LT-D (LMA 633.24 ml vs. LT-D 579.68 ml, p<0.05). During LMA insertion, the pressure on incisors of 11.41N ± 6.22N was used, while in case of LT-D this pressure amounted to 13.15N ± 3.68N. Every fourth examined paramedic had problems with correct insertion of LT-D tube in accordance with the adopted algorithm.\nConclusions: The supralottic LMA and LT-D tools seem to be an effective and safe alternative of the airway management in case of life emergency","PeriodicalId":433523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medical Service","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Supraglottic Airways Management Among Paramedics\",\"authors\":\"Szymon Wit, Paweł Więch, Marta Kłęk, Marek Muster, Grzegorz Kucaba\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/emems202103105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supraglottic airways management by paramedics using selected methods in simulated conditions.\\nMaterial and methods: The study included a group of 115 professionally active paramedics working in various health care facilities in the Podkarpackie Province. Each subject was asked to open the airways using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and a disposable laryngeal tube (LT-D) in simulated conditions. The study assessed the effectiveness of the airway opening taking into account: average tidal volume of a single breath in ml, average minute tidal volume in ml, time of insertion in seconds, the need for a second attempt, pressure on incisors in N. The obtained results were statistically analysed, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The calculations were performed with the SPSS 20 software.\\nresults: The study showed that the time of inserting of LT-D is the same as the time of LMA (LT-D: 25.95s ± 7.89s vs. LMA: 24.78s ± 8.32s; p>0.05). The mean tidal volume of a single breath was significantly higher with the LMA com-pared to LT-D (LMA 633.24 ml vs. LT-D 579.68 ml, p<0.05). During LMA insertion, the pressure on incisors of 11.41N ± 6.22N was used, while in case of LT-D this pressure amounted to 13.15N ± 3.68N. Every fourth examined paramedic had problems with correct insertion of LT-D tube in accordance with the adopted algorithm.\\nConclusions: The supralottic LMA and LT-D tools seem to be an effective and safe alternative of the airway management in case of life emergency\",\"PeriodicalId\":433523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202103105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medical Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202103105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是评估在模拟条件下护理人员使用选定方法对声门上气道管理的有效性。材料和方法:该研究包括在Podkarpackie省各卫生保健机构工作的115名专业活跃护理人员。每个受试者被要求在模拟条件下使用喉罩气道(LMA)和一次性喉管(LT-D)打开气道。本研究评估气道开放的有效性,考虑单次呼吸平均潮气量(ml)、平均分钟潮气量(ml)、插入时间(秒)、第二次尝试的需要(秒)、门牙压力(n)。所得结果进行统计学分析,p0.05)。LMA组的平均单次潮气量明显高于LT-D组(LMA 633.24 ml vs LT-D 579.68 ml, p<0.05)。LMA置入时门牙压力为11.41N±6.22N, LT-D置入时门牙压力为13.15N±3.68N。每四分之一接受检查的医护人员在按照采用的算法正确插入LT-D管方面存在问题。结论:声压过高LMA和LT-D工具似乎是生命紧急情况下气道管理的有效和安全的选择
Effectiveness of Supraglottic Airways Management Among Paramedics
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supraglottic airways management by paramedics using selected methods in simulated conditions.
Material and methods: The study included a group of 115 professionally active paramedics working in various health care facilities in the Podkarpackie Province. Each subject was asked to open the airways using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and a disposable laryngeal tube (LT-D) in simulated conditions. The study assessed the effectiveness of the airway opening taking into account: average tidal volume of a single breath in ml, average minute tidal volume in ml, time of insertion in seconds, the need for a second attempt, pressure on incisors in N. The obtained results were statistically analysed, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The calculations were performed with the SPSS 20 software.
results: The study showed that the time of inserting of LT-D is the same as the time of LMA (LT-D: 25.95s ± 7.89s vs. LMA: 24.78s ± 8.32s; p>0.05). The mean tidal volume of a single breath was significantly higher with the LMA com-pared to LT-D (LMA 633.24 ml vs. LT-D 579.68 ml, p<0.05). During LMA insertion, the pressure on incisors of 11.41N ± 6.22N was used, while in case of LT-D this pressure amounted to 13.15N ± 3.68N. Every fourth examined paramedic had problems with correct insertion of LT-D tube in accordance with the adopted algorithm.
Conclusions: The supralottic LMA and LT-D tools seem to be an effective and safe alternative of the airway management in case of life emergency