马塔兰大学英语教育专业学生《哈姆雷特》剧作中的话语标记分析

Frida Anjani Hidayat, B. Baharuddin, M. Isnaini
{"title":"马塔兰大学英语教育专业学生《哈姆雷特》剧作中的话语标记分析","authors":"Frida Anjani Hidayat, B. Baharuddin, M. Isnaini","doi":"10.29303/j.v1i2.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is targeting at portraying the sorts and the errors of discourse markers made in the articles on Hamlet drama composed by the 6th semester students of English education program at University of Mataram in the academic year 2019/2020. The technique of conducting this investigation is a blended strategy or mix of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The data were gathered from 26 students’ articles. The result of this study showed that all the types in three functional classes of discourse markers by Bruce Fraser (2009) were used by students in their articles. They are Elaborative Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 200 times (43.20%), Contrastive Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 169 times (36.50%), and Inferential Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 94 times (20.30%). The researcher found that Elaborative Discourse Markers are most frequently employed by students to elaborate the ideas. Furthermore, there are some errors in student’s articles related to Kao and Chen's theory (2011) about the six types of misuse patterns. Turns out three of six misuse patterns occur in students’ articles such as distraction, wrong relation, and semantic incompletion. There are no surface logicality, non-equivalent exchange, and overuse occurred in students’ articles.","PeriodicalId":301632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE MARKERS IN THE ARTICLES ON HAMLET DRAMA WRITTEN BY ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF MATARAM\",\"authors\":\"Frida Anjani Hidayat, B. Baharuddin, M. Isnaini\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/j.v1i2.180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is targeting at portraying the sorts and the errors of discourse markers made in the articles on Hamlet drama composed by the 6th semester students of English education program at University of Mataram in the academic year 2019/2020. The technique of conducting this investigation is a blended strategy or mix of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The data were gathered from 26 students’ articles. The result of this study showed that all the types in three functional classes of discourse markers by Bruce Fraser (2009) were used by students in their articles. They are Elaborative Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 200 times (43.20%), Contrastive Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 169 times (36.50%), and Inferential Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 94 times (20.30%). The researcher found that Elaborative Discourse Markers are most frequently employed by students to elaborate the ideas. Furthermore, there are some errors in student’s articles related to Kao and Chen's theory (2011) about the six types of misuse patterns. Turns out three of six misuse patterns occur in students’ articles such as distraction, wrong relation, and semantic incompletion. There are no surface logicality, non-equivalent exchange, and overuse occurred in students’ articles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/j.v1i2.180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/j.v1i2.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在刻画2019/2020学年马塔兰大学英语教育专业第六学期学生撰写的关于哈姆雷特戏剧的文章中话语标记的种类和错误。进行这项调查的技术是一种混合策略或定性和定量技术的混合。数据收集自26名学生的文章。本研究的结果表明,Bruce Fraser(2009)的三种功能类话语标记语的所有类型都被学生在文章中使用。它们分别是精化语篇标记,总出现次数200次(43.20%),对比语篇标记,总出现次数169次(36.50%),推理语篇标记,总出现次数94次(20.30%)。研究人员发现,学生最常使用精化语篇标记来阐述观点。此外,与Kao和Chen(2011)关于六种误用模式的理论相关的学生文章中也存在一些错误。结果表明,在学生的文章中,有六分之三的误用模式出现,如分心、错误关系和语义不完整。学生文章缺乏表面逻辑性,存在非等价交换、过度使用等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AN ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE MARKERS IN THE ARTICLES ON HAMLET DRAMA WRITTEN BY ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF MATARAM
This study is targeting at portraying the sorts and the errors of discourse markers made in the articles on Hamlet drama composed by the 6th semester students of English education program at University of Mataram in the academic year 2019/2020. The technique of conducting this investigation is a blended strategy or mix of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The data were gathered from 26 students’ articles. The result of this study showed that all the types in three functional classes of discourse markers by Bruce Fraser (2009) were used by students in their articles. They are Elaborative Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 200 times (43.20%), Contrastive Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 169 times (36.50%), and Inferential Discourse Markers with total number of occurrences 94 times (20.30%). The researcher found that Elaborative Discourse Markers are most frequently employed by students to elaborate the ideas. Furthermore, there are some errors in student’s articles related to Kao and Chen's theory (2011) about the six types of misuse patterns. Turns out three of six misuse patterns occur in students’ articles such as distraction, wrong relation, and semantic incompletion. There are no surface logicality, non-equivalent exchange, and overuse occurred in students’ articles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Students’ Awareness in Coping with Pronunciation Problems: A Study Among the Second Semester Students of English Department FKIP at University of Mataram Exploring Mr. Keating’s Teaching Style on Students’ Interest in Dead Poets.Society.Film Studying Interaction Design as an English Education Student for the Indonesian International Student Mobility Award (IISMA) in New Zealand: A Case Study in English Speaking Country Enhancing Pronunciation, Grammar & Fluency (PGF) Proficiency Despite Pandemic (EPP) through Flexy Supplementary Teaching and Learning Development Sheets The Use of Local Language Constraint-Based in the Pronunciation of Standard English: A Study at Sasaknese Learners of West Nusa Tenggara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1