循环生产模式在农业中的应用评估:卢旺达尼安萨地区的案例研究

S. Sangwa, Larissa Diane Keza, Delphine Uwumuremyi, Elke Nijman-Ross
{"title":"循环生产模式在农业中的应用评估:卢旺达尼安萨地区的案例研究","authors":"S. Sangwa, Larissa Diane Keza, Delphine Uwumuremyi, Elke Nijman-Ross","doi":"10.3389/frsus.2023.1167779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This research explored the status of the application of circular economy (CE) principles in the agricultural sector in the Nyanza district of Rwanda. Methods A multi-methodological approach was used to collect mixed data from farmers and key stakeholders operating in two selected sectors of Muyira and Busasamana to evaluate the solid waste management value chain, assess the adoption of ecological latrines and explore farmers' perception on human waste fertilizers as a CE principle. Quantitative data was collected through interviews with a sample of 1244 farmers randomly selected from Busasamana (n = 598) and Muyira (n = 646). The data were interpreted according to the research questions and analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings The results indicated that waste management is still at a rudimentary stage in the localities studied, with a waste sorting rate of 2.2% and 1.1% but with a willingness of 96.9% in Busasamana and 99.5% in Muyira sector to sort waste from organic to non-organic at source. The majority of participants, represented by 80.3% of the surveyed farming households in Busasamana and 97.5% of their counterparts in Muyira generate between 1-2 sacks of household waste per week. Food-related waste was the most predominant in Busasamana households, accounting for 99.5% while Muyira farmer households generate both food and yard wastes in proportions of 58% and 41.6% respectively. It's worth knowing that waste is dumped in the domestic rubbish pits in the two sectors, with 88% and 77.9% in Busasamana and Muyira sectors. Furthermore, the research revealed the absence of a waste collection and transport provider and a landfill in the Muyira sector, while waste collection facilities are available in Busasamana. Low adoption rates of eco-friendly latrines were observed, as farmers trick to the use of traditional pit latrines at 98.2% of the households in Busasamana and 100% in Muyira sector. Muyira being far ahead of its Busasamana counterparts in toilet dislodging (67% vs. 33%). Conclusion and recommendations Greater involvement of all actors in the system to ensure the success of the application of CE practices and initiatives was recommended as well as awareness raising and capacity building on the use of ecological latrines.","PeriodicalId":253319,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainability","volume":"1997 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the application of the circular production model in agriculture: case study of Nyanza district, Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"S. Sangwa, Larissa Diane Keza, Delphine Uwumuremyi, Elke Nijman-Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frsus.2023.1167779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction This research explored the status of the application of circular economy (CE) principles in the agricultural sector in the Nyanza district of Rwanda. Methods A multi-methodological approach was used to collect mixed data from farmers and key stakeholders operating in two selected sectors of Muyira and Busasamana to evaluate the solid waste management value chain, assess the adoption of ecological latrines and explore farmers' perception on human waste fertilizers as a CE principle. Quantitative data was collected through interviews with a sample of 1244 farmers randomly selected from Busasamana (n = 598) and Muyira (n = 646). The data were interpreted according to the research questions and analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings The results indicated that waste management is still at a rudimentary stage in the localities studied, with a waste sorting rate of 2.2% and 1.1% but with a willingness of 96.9% in Busasamana and 99.5% in Muyira sector to sort waste from organic to non-organic at source. The majority of participants, represented by 80.3% of the surveyed farming households in Busasamana and 97.5% of their counterparts in Muyira generate between 1-2 sacks of household waste per week. Food-related waste was the most predominant in Busasamana households, accounting for 99.5% while Muyira farmer households generate both food and yard wastes in proportions of 58% and 41.6% respectively. It's worth knowing that waste is dumped in the domestic rubbish pits in the two sectors, with 88% and 77.9% in Busasamana and Muyira sectors. Furthermore, the research revealed the absence of a waste collection and transport provider and a landfill in the Muyira sector, while waste collection facilities are available in Busasamana. Low adoption rates of eco-friendly latrines were observed, as farmers trick to the use of traditional pit latrines at 98.2% of the households in Busasamana and 100% in Muyira sector. Muyira being far ahead of its Busasamana counterparts in toilet dislodging (67% vs. 33%). Conclusion and recommendations Greater involvement of all actors in the system to ensure the success of the application of CE practices and initiatives was recommended as well as awareness raising and capacity building on the use of ecological latrines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"1997 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1167779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1167779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 本研究探讨了循环经济(CE)原则在卢旺达尼安萨地区农业部门的应用现状。方法 采用多种方法,从穆依拉和布萨马纳两个选定地区的农民和主要利益相关者那里收集混合数据,以评估固体废物管理价值链,评估生态厕所的采用情况,并探讨农民对作为循环经济原则的人类排泄物肥料的看法。研究人员从布萨马纳(598 人)和穆伊拉(646 人)随机抽取了 1244 名农民进行访谈,收集了定量数据。根据研究问题对数据进行了解释,并使用描述性和推论性统计进行了分析。研究结果 研究结果表明,在所研究的地方,废物管理仍处于初级阶段,废物分类率分别为 2.2% 和 1.1%,但在布萨马纳和穆伊拉地区,分别有 96.9% 和 99.5% 的人愿意在源头对废物进行有机和非有机分类。布萨马纳 80.3% 的受访农户和穆伊拉 97.5% 的受访农户代表了大多数参与者,他们每周产生 1-2 袋生活垃圾。在布萨马纳的农户中,与食物有关的废物最多,占 99.5%;而穆伊拉的农户则同时产生食物废物和庭院废物,比例分别为 58% 和 41.6%。值得注意的是,这两个地区的垃圾都被倾倒在生活垃圾池中,布萨马纳和穆伊拉地区的比例分别为 88% 和 77.9%。此外,研究还发现,穆伊拉区没有垃圾收集和运输提供商,也没有垃圾填埋场,而布萨马纳区则有垃圾收集设施。生态友好型厕所的采用率较低,在布萨马纳有 98.2% 的农户仍在使用传统的坑式厕所,而在穆伊拉区则为 100%。穆伊拉地区在厕所移位方面远远领先于布萨马纳地区(67% 对 33%)。结论与建议 建议系统中的所有参与者更多地参与进来,以确保 CE 实践和倡议的成功应用,并建议开展生态厕所使用方面的提高认识和能力建设活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of the application of the circular production model in agriculture: case study of Nyanza district, Rwanda
Introduction This research explored the status of the application of circular economy (CE) principles in the agricultural sector in the Nyanza district of Rwanda. Methods A multi-methodological approach was used to collect mixed data from farmers and key stakeholders operating in two selected sectors of Muyira and Busasamana to evaluate the solid waste management value chain, assess the adoption of ecological latrines and explore farmers' perception on human waste fertilizers as a CE principle. Quantitative data was collected through interviews with a sample of 1244 farmers randomly selected from Busasamana (n = 598) and Muyira (n = 646). The data were interpreted according to the research questions and analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings The results indicated that waste management is still at a rudimentary stage in the localities studied, with a waste sorting rate of 2.2% and 1.1% but with a willingness of 96.9% in Busasamana and 99.5% in Muyira sector to sort waste from organic to non-organic at source. The majority of participants, represented by 80.3% of the surveyed farming households in Busasamana and 97.5% of their counterparts in Muyira generate between 1-2 sacks of household waste per week. Food-related waste was the most predominant in Busasamana households, accounting for 99.5% while Muyira farmer households generate both food and yard wastes in proportions of 58% and 41.6% respectively. It's worth knowing that waste is dumped in the domestic rubbish pits in the two sectors, with 88% and 77.9% in Busasamana and Muyira sectors. Furthermore, the research revealed the absence of a waste collection and transport provider and a landfill in the Muyira sector, while waste collection facilities are available in Busasamana. Low adoption rates of eco-friendly latrines were observed, as farmers trick to the use of traditional pit latrines at 98.2% of the households in Busasamana and 100% in Muyira sector. Muyira being far ahead of its Busasamana counterparts in toilet dislodging (67% vs. 33%). Conclusion and recommendations Greater involvement of all actors in the system to ensure the success of the application of CE practices and initiatives was recommended as well as awareness raising and capacity building on the use of ecological latrines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Campus sustainability at Rhodes University, South Africa: perceptions, awareness level, and potential interventions PET and polyolefin plastics supply chains in Michigan: present and future systems analysis of environmental and socio-economic impacts COP28 and the global stocktake: a weak attempt to address climate change Strengthening resilience: decentralized decision-making and multi-criteria analysis in the energy-water-food nexus systems Tomato disease detection with lightweight recurrent and convolutional deep learning models for sustainable and smart agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1