Martianus Capella解说员的词汇。一些观察

M. Teeuwen
{"title":"Martianus Capella解说员的词汇。一些观察","authors":"M. Teeuwen","doi":"10.3406/alma.2005.887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The oldest commentary traditions on Martianus Capella are not a rich source for neologisms in the strict sense of the word. Newly formed words, arisen from contact with, for example, vernacular languages, are hardly used in these texts. And yet, they are highly interesting sources when one is interested in lexicog­ raphy. They are full of Latinized forms of Greek terminology, and of old words with new meanings, particulary in the area of the technical vocabulary of the seven liberal arts. They have, as will be illustrated in this paper, new forms caused by a faulty transmission of the text. What do we consider these ? Are they new words ? Are they plain errors ? They are, in most cases, edited as errors, or rather dismissed as errors and emended out of existence in scholarly editions, which, consequently, makes it hard to trace them. The focus of this paper will be on this kind of vocabulary ; not so much the phenomenon of the new formation of words, but rather the sheer interest in vocabulary, and especially the technical vocabulary to which the ninth-century commentaries on Martianus Capella testify.","PeriodicalId":309817,"journal":{"name":"Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The vocabulary of Martianus Capella commentators. Some observations\",\"authors\":\"M. Teeuwen\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/alma.2005.887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The oldest commentary traditions on Martianus Capella are not a rich source for neologisms in the strict sense of the word. Newly formed words, arisen from contact with, for example, vernacular languages, are hardly used in these texts. And yet, they are highly interesting sources when one is interested in lexicog­ raphy. They are full of Latinized forms of Greek terminology, and of old words with new meanings, particulary in the area of the technical vocabulary of the seven liberal arts. They have, as will be illustrated in this paper, new forms caused by a faulty transmission of the text. What do we consider these ? Are they new words ? Are they plain errors ? They are, in most cases, edited as errors, or rather dismissed as errors and emended out of existence in scholarly editions, which, consequently, makes it hard to trace them. The focus of this paper will be on this kind of vocabulary ; not so much the phenomenon of the new formation of words, but rather the sheer interest in vocabulary, and especially the technical vocabulary to which the ninth-century commentaries on Martianus Capella testify.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/alma.2005.887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/alma.2005.887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从严格意义上讲,最古老的关于马提亚努斯·卡佩拉的评论传统并不是新词的丰富来源。新形成的词,从接触,例如,当地语言,很少在这些文本中使用。然而,当一个人对词典编纂感兴趣时,它们是非常有趣的来源。它们充满了拉丁化形式的希腊术语,以及具有新含义的旧单词,特别是在七门文科的技术词汇领域。正如本文将要说明的那样,它们具有由于文本传输错误而引起的新形式。我们怎么看待这些呢?它们是新单词吗?它们是明显的错误吗?在大多数情况下,它们被编辑为错误,或者更确切地说,被当作错误而忽略,在学术版本中被修改得不存在,因此,很难追踪它们。本文的重点将放在这类词汇上;与其说是词汇新形成的现象,不如说是对词汇的纯粹兴趣,尤其是对技术词汇的兴趣,9世纪对马提亚努斯·卡佩拉的评论证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The vocabulary of Martianus Capella commentators. Some observations
The oldest commentary traditions on Martianus Capella are not a rich source for neologisms in the strict sense of the word. Newly formed words, arisen from contact with, for example, vernacular languages, are hardly used in these texts. And yet, they are highly interesting sources when one is interested in lexicog­ raphy. They are full of Latinized forms of Greek terminology, and of old words with new meanings, particulary in the area of the technical vocabulary of the seven liberal arts. They have, as will be illustrated in this paper, new forms caused by a faulty transmission of the text. What do we consider these ? Are they new words ? Are they plain errors ? They are, in most cases, edited as errors, or rather dismissed as errors and emended out of existence in scholarly editions, which, consequently, makes it hard to trace them. The focus of this paper will be on this kind of vocabulary ; not so much the phenomenon of the new formation of words, but rather the sheer interest in vocabulary, and especially the technical vocabulary to which the ninth-century commentaries on Martianus Capella testify.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Le vocabulaire technique en latin médiéval, entre mythe et réalité Bannus. Zur Geschichte einer mittellateinischen Wortgruppe im europäischen Bezug Hic Hugucio, quantumcumque bonus, videtur aliquantulum dormitasse – der Meister im Urteil von Kollegen Translations from Arabic (Astronomy/Astrology) : The Formation of Terminology Incendula or monedula ? An Enigmatic Bird Name in Medieval Latin-Written Sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1