无人机游戏:论现代狩猎运动中欺骗的道德意义

E. von Essen, Michael Allen, L. Tickle
{"title":"无人机游戏:论现代狩猎运动中欺骗的道德意义","authors":"E. von Essen, Michael Allen, L. Tickle","doi":"10.22618/tp.pjcv.20204.2.1763008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seeming absence of mutual consent in interspecies sports makes it difficult to justify non-human animals participating on equal terms with humans in for example sport hunting. Nevertheless, hunted animals might appear to be ‘playing the game’ to the extent they resort to counter-deceptions, which often fool the hunters or their dogs. In this paper, we consider whether counter-deception by hunted animals is evidence that they are not playing the hunter’s game at all, or rather playing a different serious game of survival, one in which they repudiate the role of ‘worthy opponent’ instead by playing the role of trickster-resistors.","PeriodicalId":220201,"journal":{"name":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Game of Drones: On the Moral Significance of Deception in Modern Sport Hunting\",\"authors\":\"E. von Essen, Michael Allen, L. Tickle\",\"doi\":\"10.22618/tp.pjcv.20204.2.1763008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The seeming absence of mutual consent in interspecies sports makes it difficult to justify non-human animals participating on equal terms with humans in for example sport hunting. Nevertheless, hunted animals might appear to be ‘playing the game’ to the extent they resort to counter-deceptions, which often fool the hunters or their dogs. In this paper, we consider whether counter-deception by hunted animals is evidence that they are not playing the hunter’s game at all, or rather playing a different serious game of survival, one in which they repudiate the role of ‘worthy opponent’ instead by playing the role of trickster-resistors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20204.2.1763008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22618/tp.pjcv.20204.2.1763008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在物种间的运动中似乎缺乏相互同意,这使得很难证明非人类动物与人类平等参与例如狩猎运动。然而,被捕猎的动物可能会在某种程度上表现出“玩游戏”的样子,它们会采取反欺骗手段,这通常会欺骗猎人或他们的狗。在本文中,我们考虑被捕猎动物的反欺骗行为是否证明它们根本没有在玩猎人的游戏,或者更确切地说,它们在玩一种不同的严肃的生存游戏,在这种游戏中,它们拒绝扮演“有价值的对手”的角色,而是扮演骗子-抵抗者的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Game of Drones: On the Moral Significance of Deception in Modern Sport Hunting
The seeming absence of mutual consent in interspecies sports makes it difficult to justify non-human animals participating on equal terms with humans in for example sport hunting. Nevertheless, hunted animals might appear to be ‘playing the game’ to the extent they resort to counter-deceptions, which often fool the hunters or their dogs. In this paper, we consider whether counter-deception by hunted animals is evidence that they are not playing the hunter’s game at all, or rather playing a different serious game of survival, one in which they repudiate the role of ‘worthy opponent’ instead by playing the role of trickster-resistors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haneke, Moral Violence and Morbid Curiosity Accounting for Alliances in Clausewitz’s Theory of War Three Platonic Themes in Clausewitz: A Forgotten Legacy The Conception of stasis and pleonexia in Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings: Platonic Influences and Bricolages ‘They’re Saved from the Blessings of Civilization’: Violence, Law, and Progress in the Westerns of John Ford
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1