{"title":"拒绝访问","authors":"Diana Madril","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric technology, some would argue as innovative and responsible, yet over time other researchers have seen the less inclusive environment these technologies create. Additionally, the gaps in these predictive technology systems may deny access to some individuals and, in some cases, deem the technology as a truth-telling mechanism even when proper identification is presented. This paper highlights a literature review and discussion around the ways we may responsibly innovate. Responsible innovation, anticipatory governance, and policy decision making can shape innovative practices' fabrication molded for an inclusive environment. The paper also bridges a collective discussion of researchers who argue the harmful impacts within these innovative technology systems that guide our social environments. Oftentimes, we assume the systems innovated, such as AI and biometric technology, provide a path for control and safety. Yet, we need to reconsider the undesirable impact and discover new ways to create inclusive technology that does not wrongfully deny access to some citizens. The governance of technology may be a path for responsibly structuring for the public's interest. These innovative systems are theoretically set for shaping our future, yet some researchers argue these technology systems contain archaic social system practices.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access Denied\",\"authors\":\"Diana Madril\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric technology, some would argue as innovative and responsible, yet over time other researchers have seen the less inclusive environment these technologies create. Additionally, the gaps in these predictive technology systems may deny access to some individuals and, in some cases, deem the technology as a truth-telling mechanism even when proper identification is presented. This paper highlights a literature review and discussion around the ways we may responsibly innovate. Responsible innovation, anticipatory governance, and policy decision making can shape innovative practices' fabrication molded for an inclusive environment. The paper also bridges a collective discussion of researchers who argue the harmful impacts within these innovative technology systems that guide our social environments. Oftentimes, we assume the systems innovated, such as AI and biometric technology, provide a path for control and safety. Yet, we need to reconsider the undesirable impact and discover new ways to create inclusive technology that does not wrongfully deny access to some citizens. The governance of technology may be a path for responsibly structuring for the public's interest. These innovative systems are theoretically set for shaping our future, yet some researchers argue these technology systems contain archaic social system practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric technology, some would argue as innovative and responsible, yet over time other researchers have seen the less inclusive environment these technologies create. Additionally, the gaps in these predictive technology systems may deny access to some individuals and, in some cases, deem the technology as a truth-telling mechanism even when proper identification is presented. This paper highlights a literature review and discussion around the ways we may responsibly innovate. Responsible innovation, anticipatory governance, and policy decision making can shape innovative practices' fabrication molded for an inclusive environment. The paper also bridges a collective discussion of researchers who argue the harmful impacts within these innovative technology systems that guide our social environments. Oftentimes, we assume the systems innovated, such as AI and biometric technology, provide a path for control and safety. Yet, we need to reconsider the undesirable impact and discover new ways to create inclusive technology that does not wrongfully deny access to some citizens. The governance of technology may be a path for responsibly structuring for the public's interest. These innovative systems are theoretically set for shaping our future, yet some researchers argue these technology systems contain archaic social system practices.