亚里士多德对《奥德赛》的自然主义解读

R. Mayhew
{"title":"亚里士多德对《奥德赛》的自然主义解读","authors":"R. Mayhew","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198834564.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This final chapter considers the textual evidence for Aristotle’s (possible or probable) discussions of three episodes in Odyssey 12, namely, concerning the Sirens, the ambrosia-bearing doves, and the Cattle of the Sun. All three have historically been treated allegorically. Further, as some contemporary scholars take the fragments on these doves and cattle to be evidence for Aristotle interpreting Homer allegorically, this is an appropriate place to return to the issue of whether Aristotle ever employs allegorical interpretation, and as such it serves as an appropriate conclusion to the volume. The essential nature of what Aristotle is doing in his Homeric Problems is to defend Homer (where possible) according to rational principles of literary criticism, but without relying on allegorical interpretation.","PeriodicalId":369038,"journal":{"name":"Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aristotle’s Naturalistic Interpretation of Odyssey 12\",\"authors\":\"R. Mayhew\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198834564.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This final chapter considers the textual evidence for Aristotle’s (possible or probable) discussions of three episodes in Odyssey 12, namely, concerning the Sirens, the ambrosia-bearing doves, and the Cattle of the Sun. All three have historically been treated allegorically. Further, as some contemporary scholars take the fragments on these doves and cattle to be evidence for Aristotle interpreting Homer allegorically, this is an appropriate place to return to the issue of whether Aristotle ever employs allegorical interpretation, and as such it serves as an appropriate conclusion to the volume. The essential nature of what Aristotle is doing in his Homeric Problems is to defend Homer (where possible) according to rational principles of literary criticism, but without relying on allegorical interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198834564.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198834564.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这最后一章考虑了亚里士多德(可能或可能)讨论《奥德赛》第12章中三个章节的文本证据,即关于塞壬,带着安布罗陀的鸽子和太阳的牛。这三者在历史上都被讽喻地对待。此外,一些当代学者把鸽子和牛身上的碎片作为亚里士多德用寓言解释荷马的证据,这是一个合适的地方,可以回到亚里士多德是否使用寓言解释的问题,因此,它可以作为本卷的适当结论。亚里士多德在他的《荷马问题》中所做的事情的本质是(在可能的情况下)根据文学批评的理性原则来捍卫荷马,但不依赖于寓言的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aristotle’s Naturalistic Interpretation of Odyssey 12
This final chapter considers the textual evidence for Aristotle’s (possible or probable) discussions of three episodes in Odyssey 12, namely, concerning the Sirens, the ambrosia-bearing doves, and the Cattle of the Sun. All three have historically been treated allegorically. Further, as some contemporary scholars take the fragments on these doves and cattle to be evidence for Aristotle interpreting Homer allegorically, this is an appropriate place to return to the issue of whether Aristotle ever employs allegorical interpretation, and as such it serves as an appropriate conclusion to the volume. The essential nature of what Aristotle is doing in his Homeric Problems is to defend Homer (where possible) according to rational principles of literary criticism, but without relying on allegorical interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pre-Aristotelian Homeric Scholarship and Aristotle’s Poetics 25 The Evidence from Poetics 21 Aristotle and Aristarchus on the Meaning of κέρας‎ in the Iliad The Titles (and Subtitles) of Aristotle’s Lost Work on Homer The Evidence from the History of Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1