{"title":"符号学作为分析工具:屠格涅夫的短篇小说《木木》。","authors":"S. Savinkov","doi":"10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-164-169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article should be considered in connection with the materials proposed for publication in the 1st (28) issue of this publication for 2017 and in the 2 nd (39) for 2019: «Semiotics as a tool for analyzing a literary text: experience of practical application» and «Semiotics as a tool for analysis: «Light breathing» by I. A. Bunin», respectively. This time, the author chose the textbook work of I. S. Turgenev, the story «Mumu», as the subject of the analysis. The difficulty in solving this problem, on the one hand, lies in the need to overcome the established stereotypes in relation to this work, and on the other, in the need to take into account the intertextual connections and relations within the writer’s work and the idea of the uniqueness of his philosophy of nature.","PeriodicalId":187515,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Text","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEMIOTICS AS A TOOL OF ANALYSIS: I. S. TURGENEV’S SHORT STORY “MUMU”.\",\"authors\":\"S. Savinkov\",\"doi\":\"10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-164-169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article should be considered in connection with the materials proposed for publication in the 1st (28) issue of this publication for 2017 and in the 2 nd (39) for 2019: «Semiotics as a tool for analyzing a literary text: experience of practical application» and «Semiotics as a tool for analysis: «Light breathing» by I. A. Bunin», respectively. This time, the author chose the textbook work of I. S. Turgenev, the story «Mumu», as the subject of the analysis. The difficulty in solving this problem, on the one hand, lies in the need to overcome the established stereotypes in relation to this work, and on the other, in the need to take into account the intertextual connections and relations within the writer’s work and the idea of the uniqueness of his philosophy of nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture and Text\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture and Text\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-164-169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Text","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37386/2305-4077-2021-2-164-169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文应与本出版物2017年第1期(28)和2019年第2期(39)拟出版的材料一起考虑:“符号学作为分析文学文本的工具:实际应用的经验”和“符号学作为分析工具:I. a . Bunin的“轻呼吸””。这一次,笔者选择屠格涅夫的教科书作品《木木》作为分析对象。解决这个问题的困难,一方面在于需要克服与这部作品有关的既定刻板印象,另一方面,需要考虑到作家作品中的互文联系和关系,以及他的自然哲学的独特性。
SEMIOTICS AS A TOOL OF ANALYSIS: I. S. TURGENEV’S SHORT STORY “MUMU”.
This article should be considered in connection with the materials proposed for publication in the 1st (28) issue of this publication for 2017 and in the 2 nd (39) for 2019: «Semiotics as a tool for analyzing a literary text: experience of practical application» and «Semiotics as a tool for analysis: «Light breathing» by I. A. Bunin», respectively. This time, the author chose the textbook work of I. S. Turgenev, the story «Mumu», as the subject of the analysis. The difficulty in solving this problem, on the one hand, lies in the need to overcome the established stereotypes in relation to this work, and on the other, in the need to take into account the intertextual connections and relations within the writer’s work and the idea of the uniqueness of his philosophy of nature.