新制度经济学视角下的资本市场信息(去)管制

H. Dietl, A. Picot
{"title":"新制度经济学视角下的资本市场信息(去)管制","authors":"H. Dietl, A. Picot","doi":"10.15057/5543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laws against insider trading, disclosure requirements, and auditing rules form the basis for information regulation of capital markets. Although the economic effects of insider dealing are mixed, institutional economics favors a prohibition of insider trading to minimize the negative effects. Private regulation of insider trading will fail because of weak disciplinary mechanisms. To prevent overregulation, however, corporations should have the right to opt out of the general ban on insider trading. The impairment of information efficiency by laws against insider trading must not automatically be countered by public disclosure and auditing rules. It is efficient to install competition among public and private disclosure and auditing standards.","PeriodicalId":154016,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information(De-)Regulation of Capital Markets from the Viewpoint of New Institutional Economics\",\"authors\":\"H. Dietl, A. Picot\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/5543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Laws against insider trading, disclosure requirements, and auditing rules form the basis for information regulation of capital markets. Although the economic effects of insider dealing are mixed, institutional economics favors a prohibition of insider trading to minimize the negative effects. Private regulation of insider trading will fail because of weak disciplinary mechanisms. To prevent overregulation, however, corporations should have the right to opt out of the general ban on insider trading. The impairment of information efficiency by laws against insider trading must not automatically be countered by public disclosure and auditing rules. It is efficient to install competition among public and private disclosure and auditing standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/5543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/5543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

反对内幕交易的法律、披露要求和审计规则构成了资本市场信息监管的基础。虽然内幕交易的经济影响是复杂的,但制度经济学倾向于禁止内幕交易,以尽量减少负面影响。由于惩戒机制薄弱,对内幕交易的私人监管将会失败。然而,为了防止过度监管,企业应该有权选择不参与对内幕交易的全面禁令。禁止内幕交易的法律对信息效率的损害不应自动被公开披露和审计规则所抵消。在公共和私人披露和审计标准之间建立竞争是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information(De-)Regulation of Capital Markets from the Viewpoint of New Institutional Economics
Laws against insider trading, disclosure requirements, and auditing rules form the basis for information regulation of capital markets. Although the economic effects of insider dealing are mixed, institutional economics favors a prohibition of insider trading to minimize the negative effects. Private regulation of insider trading will fail because of weak disciplinary mechanisms. To prevent overregulation, however, corporations should have the right to opt out of the general ban on insider trading. The impairment of information efficiency by laws against insider trading must not automatically be countered by public disclosure and auditing rules. It is efficient to install competition among public and private disclosure and auditing standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Approach to Modeling on Financial Time Series Data with Regime Shifts Prioritizing Public Interest: The Essence of Shibusawa's Doctrine and Its Implications for the Re-invention of Capitalism The Cyclical Patterns of Capital Buffers: Evidence from Japanese Banks Produktions- und kostentheoretische Fundierung der Kostenrechnung der Servicefunktionen The Luxury Watches as Double-Storied Symbol System: Brand Historicity in Ahistorical China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1