{"title":"1. 不可思议的肉体,不可能的雕像","authors":"Filippo Fimiani","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvn4.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to phenomenology, existence is an incarnate subjectivation\n which frees, by perceiving and imagining, the ‘Self’ from its petrification.\n Autobiography is a fiction pretending to repair this vitality, to represent\n the irrevocable future instant of death by images and words and to record\n the past as an irremediable destiny. To write the singular own existence\n is thus to make up a monumentalisation of the living being, fixed as a\n statue and fascinating as an idol, a death mask or a mummy. In the 1940s,\n Sartre, Lévinas, Blanchot and Bataille discussed Baudelaire, Proust and\n Leiris to challenge Heidegger’s existentialism and ontology of art. The\n essay examines this crucial debate—interdisciplinary, intertextual and\n intermedial—about literature and philosophy, picture, magic and death.","PeriodicalId":220682,"journal":{"name":"Bodies of Stone in the Media, Visual Culture and the Arts","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1. The Impassibly Fleshly, the Statue of the Impossible\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Fimiani\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvn4.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to phenomenology, existence is an incarnate subjectivation\\n which frees, by perceiving and imagining, the ‘Self’ from its petrification.\\n Autobiography is a fiction pretending to repair this vitality, to represent\\n the irrevocable future instant of death by images and words and to record\\n the past as an irremediable destiny. To write the singular own existence\\n is thus to make up a monumentalisation of the living being, fixed as a\\n statue and fascinating as an idol, a death mask or a mummy. In the 1940s,\\n Sartre, Lévinas, Blanchot and Bataille discussed Baudelaire, Proust and\\n Leiris to challenge Heidegger’s existentialism and ontology of art. The\\n essay examines this crucial debate—interdisciplinary, intertextual and\\n intermedial—about literature and philosophy, picture, magic and death.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bodies of Stone in the Media, Visual Culture and the Arts\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bodies of Stone in the Media, Visual Culture and the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvn4.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bodies of Stone in the Media, Visual Culture and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvn4.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
1. The Impassibly Fleshly, the Statue of the Impossible
According to phenomenology, existence is an incarnate subjectivation
which frees, by perceiving and imagining, the ‘Self’ from its petrification.
Autobiography is a fiction pretending to repair this vitality, to represent
the irrevocable future instant of death by images and words and to record
the past as an irremediable destiny. To write the singular own existence
is thus to make up a monumentalisation of the living being, fixed as a
statue and fascinating as an idol, a death mask or a mummy. In the 1940s,
Sartre, Lévinas, Blanchot and Bataille discussed Baudelaire, Proust and
Leiris to challenge Heidegger’s existentialism and ontology of art. The
essay examines this crucial debate—interdisciplinary, intertextual and
intermedial—about literature and philosophy, picture, magic and death.