i .导言ii。国立5·18民主墓地的圣域化,骨灰和文化表现出了对公园化的讨论。iii。作为2022年统合管理运营政策和民主墓地개별성之间通过和谐的未来型iv .发展规划前景结论

Ik-Soon Cho
{"title":"i .导言ii。国立5·18民主墓地的圣域化,骨灰和文化表现出了对公园化的讨论。iii。作为2022年统合管理运营政策和民主墓地개별성之间通过和谐的未来型iv .发展规划前景结论","authors":"Ik-Soon Cho","doi":"10.55082/jdp.2022.5.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The May 18 National Democratic Cemetery, after being raised in the status of national cemetery, has been at the center of discourse on the management and operation of the democratic cemetery for about 20 years until 2022 just as providing power to the democratization movement by going through with commemorating the victims of the May 18 uprising in the mid-1980s. This paper presents a future-oriented direction by deriving policy implications by examining the trend of discourse over the past 20 years on the management and operation of this place based on the historical symbolism of the May 18 cemetery as a democratic holy place. \nTo this end, the reports of the Korea Economic Research Institute (2005) and the Korea Modern and Social Research Institute (2006) are first examined and compared with the latest reports produced in 2021. As a result, it is found that the management and operation of the May 18 cemetery has a history of not fully demonstrating the memorial and educational functions, including the enactment of the National Cemetery Act in 2005 and the government's integrated management and operation policy in 2022. Accordingly, it is argued that a new development plan considering the convenience of visitors is needed to introduce new burial methods such as charnel and natural burial after 2022 and to devise an effective cultural park. In addition to the Memorial Hall, this study expects timely value in suggesting the history of the May 18 cemetery, the geological environment, and the direction of specific education and tourism discussions.","PeriodicalId":263375,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Peace Institute, Chosun University","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 국립5‧18민주묘지의 성역화와 납골 및 문화적 공원화에 대한 담론 양상 Ⅲ. 2022년 통합관리운영 정책과 민주묘지로서의 개별성 간 조화를 통한 미래형 발전계획 전망 Ⅳ. 결론\",\"authors\":\"Ik-Soon Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.55082/jdp.2022.5.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The May 18 National Democratic Cemetery, after being raised in the status of national cemetery, has been at the center of discourse on the management and operation of the democratic cemetery for about 20 years until 2022 just as providing power to the democratization movement by going through with commemorating the victims of the May 18 uprising in the mid-1980s. This paper presents a future-oriented direction by deriving policy implications by examining the trend of discourse over the past 20 years on the management and operation of this place based on the historical symbolism of the May 18 cemetery as a democratic holy place. \\nTo this end, the reports of the Korea Economic Research Institute (2005) and the Korea Modern and Social Research Institute (2006) are first examined and compared with the latest reports produced in 2021. As a result, it is found that the management and operation of the May 18 cemetery has a history of not fully demonstrating the memorial and educational functions, including the enactment of the National Cemetery Act in 2005 and the government's integrated management and operation policy in 2022. Accordingly, it is argued that a new development plan considering the convenience of visitors is needed to introduce new burial methods such as charnel and natural burial after 2022 and to devise an effective cultural park. In addition to the Memorial Hall, this study expects timely value in suggesting the history of the May 18 cemetery, the geological environment, and the direction of specific education and tourism discussions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Democracy and Peace Institute, Chosun University\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Democracy and Peace Institute, Chosun University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55082/jdp.2022.5.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democracy and Peace Institute, Chosun University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55082/jdp.2022.5.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

5·18国立民主墓地在被提升为国立墓地之后,在20年左右的时间里一直是民主墓地管理和运营的焦点,因为它通过纪念20世纪80年代中期的5·18死难者,为民主化运动提供了动力。本文以5·18墓地作为民主圣地的历史象征意义为基础,通过分析20年来有关5·18墓地管理和运营的话语走向,得出政策启示,提出了面向未来的方向。为此,首先将韩国经济研究院(2005年)和韩国现代社会研究院(2006年)的报告书与2021年的最新报告书进行比较。结果发现,包括2005年国立墓地法的制定和2022年政府的综合管理运营政策在内,5·18墓地的管理运营存在着没有充分体现纪念和教育功能的历史。因此,为了在2022年以后引进槽葬、自然埋葬等新的埋葬方式,并设计出有效的文化公园,有必要制定考虑到游客便利性的新开发计划。除了纪念馆之外,本研究希望在5.18墓地的历史、地质环境以及具体教育和旅游讨论的方向上提出及时的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 국립5‧18민주묘지의 성역화와 납골 및 문화적 공원화에 대한 담론 양상 Ⅲ. 2022년 통합관리운영 정책과 민주묘지로서의 개별성 간 조화를 통한 미래형 발전계획 전망 Ⅳ. 결론
The May 18 National Democratic Cemetery, after being raised in the status of national cemetery, has been at the center of discourse on the management and operation of the democratic cemetery for about 20 years until 2022 just as providing power to the democratization movement by going through with commemorating the victims of the May 18 uprising in the mid-1980s. This paper presents a future-oriented direction by deriving policy implications by examining the trend of discourse over the past 20 years on the management and operation of this place based on the historical symbolism of the May 18 cemetery as a democratic holy place. To this end, the reports of the Korea Economic Research Institute (2005) and the Korea Modern and Social Research Institute (2006) are first examined and compared with the latest reports produced in 2021. As a result, it is found that the management and operation of the May 18 cemetery has a history of not fully demonstrating the memorial and educational functions, including the enactment of the National Cemetery Act in 2005 and the government's integrated management and operation policy in 2022. Accordingly, it is argued that a new development plan considering the convenience of visitors is needed to introduce new burial methods such as charnel and natural burial after 2022 and to devise an effective cultural park. In addition to the Memorial Hall, this study expects timely value in suggesting the history of the May 18 cemetery, the geological environment, and the direction of specific education and tourism discussions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Activity and Damage of Commissioner Ahn Byungha and the Police of Jeonnam Province during the 5·18 Period A Study of Legal Philosophy on the 5·18 Civilian Militia's Activities: Centered on the Relationship between Governmental Authority and Vigilantism A Study of Aesthetic Politics on the Well-Timed Value of May 18 Dance Problems after the Introduction of the Local Community Policing System and Civil-Police Cooperation as its Alternative Awakening of Wartime Sexual Assault in Paco's Story by Larry Heinemann
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1