基于改进自相关估计的血管壁跟踪

S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert
{"title":"基于改进自相关估计的血管壁跟踪","authors":"S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.","PeriodicalId":378705,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vessel wall tracking based on the modified autocorrelation estimator\",\"authors\":\"S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在16名受试者(年龄26-74岁)中,我们使用了一台成像仪(挪威Horten的GE Vingmed超声)记录了颈动脉的射频(RF)数据,并使用WallTrack记录了颈动脉的直径(Pie Medical,荷兰马斯特里赫特)。射频数据以复杂解调射频数据(IQ数据)的形式存储,并传输到PC机中用于估计直径曲线。对于原型系统,采用一种改进的自相关方法推导出直径曲线,而不是采用复互相关方法。对于所有数据集,取2-5次心跳的平均值,以计算具有代表性的单周期曲线。两种系统测得的直径膨胀/spl δ /D在0.27 ~ 0.71 mm范围内,与平均差值-0.03 mm高度相关(r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03),一致性限为-0.15 ~ 0.09 mm(平均差值/spl + usmn/ 2*SD差值)。相对扩张/spl δ /D/D范围为3.5 ~ 11.1%,相关系数r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75)。/spl Delta/D/D的平均差值为-0.4%,一致性限为-2.2 ~ 1.4%。综上所述,本研究表明,采用改进的自相关方法进行血管壁跟踪是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vessel wall tracking based on the modified autocorrelation estimator
In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of transducers arrays from piezoelectric hollow spheres Non-cylindrical transmission focusing for large depth of field Detection and mapping of thermal lesions using dual-mode ultrasound phased arrays Layered manufacturing for prototyping of novel transducers The effect of microbubble concentration on thresholds for tissue damage produced by single bursts of high intensity ultrasound during continuous Optison/spl reg/ infusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1