S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert
{"title":"基于改进自相关估计的血管壁跟踪","authors":"S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.","PeriodicalId":378705,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vessel wall tracking based on the modified autocorrelation estimator\",\"authors\":\"S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vessel wall tracking based on the modified autocorrelation estimator
In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.