在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间为核心外科学员提供社交距离训练营:我们是如何做到的

C. Blane, L. Merker, J. Mutimer, James James, R. Bamford
{"title":"在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间为核心外科学员提供社交距离训练营:我们是如何做到的","authors":"C. Blane, L. Merker, J. Mutimer, James James, R. Bamford","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Boot camps are an important way to ensure trainees have the necessary skills and confidence as they commence a new stage of training. They are an established part of many post-graduate training programmes. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant disruption in post-graduate training, making boot camps an even more important intervention. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used anonymous feedback surveys to evaluate the acceptability of a new blended, socially distanced format of boot camp to trainees starting core surgical training in August 2020. Formal ethical approval was not required for this study. Results: All 27 new trainees in HEESW Severn School of Surgery attended the boot camp; over 80% participated in all three feedback surveys (22 [81%] completed the feedback for day 1, 23 [85%] for day 2 and 26 [96%] for day 3). Overall feedback was positive; compared with 2019, there was no significant difference in reported readiness to perform as a core trainee, understanding of the role or the benefit gained from meeting other trainees. When asked which boot camp format the trainees preferred, they favoured all attending in one location (4.65) over the current “hub” format (3.74), which was in turn preferable to attending virtually from home (2.39). (P50.05). Conclusion: Although trainees expressed a preference for the previous model in which their entire cohort attended the boot camp together, the blended format was acceptable to trainees and allowed us to provide a boot camp while following social distancing requirements.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delivering a socially distanced boot camp for core surgical trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic: how we did it\",\"authors\":\"C. Blane, L. Merker, J. Mutimer, James James, R. Bamford\",\"doi\":\"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Boot camps are an important way to ensure trainees have the necessary skills and confidence as they commence a new stage of training. They are an established part of many post-graduate training programmes. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant disruption in post-graduate training, making boot camps an even more important intervention. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used anonymous feedback surveys to evaluate the acceptability of a new blended, socially distanced format of boot camp to trainees starting core surgical training in August 2020. Formal ethical approval was not required for this study. Results: All 27 new trainees in HEESW Severn School of Surgery attended the boot camp; over 80% participated in all three feedback surveys (22 [81%] completed the feedback for day 1, 23 [85%] for day 2 and 26 [96%] for day 3). Overall feedback was positive; compared with 2019, there was no significant difference in reported readiness to perform as a core trainee, understanding of the role or the benefit gained from meeting other trainees. When asked which boot camp format the trainees preferred, they favoured all attending in one location (4.65) over the current “hub” format (3.74), which was in turn preferable to attending virtually from home (2.39). (P50.05). Conclusion: Although trainees expressed a preference for the previous model in which their entire cohort attended the boot camp together, the blended format was acceptable to trainees and allowed us to provide a boot camp while following social distancing requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新兵训练营是确保受训者在开始新的训练阶段时拥有必要技能和信心的重要途径。它们是许多研究生培训方案的既定组成部分。2019冠状病毒病大流行导致研究生培训严重中断,使新兵训练营成为更重要的干预措施。方法:本回顾性队列研究采用匿名反馈调查来评估2020年8月开始核心外科训练的学员对一种新的混合、社交距离形式的新兵训练营的可接受性。这项研究不需要正式的伦理批准。结果:27名新进学员全部参加新兵训练营;超过80%的人参与了所有三项反馈调查(22人(81%)完成了第1天的反馈,23人(85%)完成了第2天的反馈,26人(96%)完成了第3天的反馈)。总体反馈是积极的;与2019年相比,在作为核心培训生的表现准备程度、对角色的理解或从与其他培训生会面中获得的好处方面,报告没有显著差异。当被问及学员更喜欢哪种新兵训练营形式时,他们更喜欢所有人在一个地方参加(4.65分),而不是目前的“中心”形式(3.74分),后者比在家参加(2.39分)更受欢迎。(P50.05)。结论:尽管受训者表示更喜欢之前的模式,即他们的整个群体一起参加新兵训练营,但混合格式对受训者来说是可以接受的,并且允许我们在遵循社交距离要求的情况下提供新兵训练营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delivering a socially distanced boot camp for core surgical trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic: how we did it
Background: Boot camps are an important way to ensure trainees have the necessary skills and confidence as they commence a new stage of training. They are an established part of many post-graduate training programmes. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant disruption in post-graduate training, making boot camps an even more important intervention. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used anonymous feedback surveys to evaluate the acceptability of a new blended, socially distanced format of boot camp to trainees starting core surgical training in August 2020. Formal ethical approval was not required for this study. Results: All 27 new trainees in HEESW Severn School of Surgery attended the boot camp; over 80% participated in all three feedback surveys (22 [81%] completed the feedback for day 1, 23 [85%] for day 2 and 26 [96%] for day 3). Overall feedback was positive; compared with 2019, there was no significant difference in reported readiness to perform as a core trainee, understanding of the role or the benefit gained from meeting other trainees. When asked which boot camp format the trainees preferred, they favoured all attending in one location (4.65) over the current “hub” format (3.74), which was in turn preferable to attending virtually from home (2.39). (P50.05). Conclusion: Although trainees expressed a preference for the previous model in which their entire cohort attended the boot camp together, the blended format was acceptable to trainees and allowed us to provide a boot camp while following social distancing requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1