{"title":"使用有限元分析预测故障时间","authors":"G. A. Bivens","doi":"10.1109/ARMS.1990.67976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed on three different surface mounted designs: a leadless chip carrier, gull-wing chip carrier, and compliant S-lead leadless chip carrier. The output of the FEA was input into the Coffin-Manson model, and the number of thermal cycles to failure was estimated. The results indicated that the gull-wing and S-leads chip carriers would be reliable when placed in this temperature environment but the leadless chip carriers would have reliability problems after a short period of time.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":383597,"journal":{"name":"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting time-to-failure using finite element analysis\",\"authors\":\"G. A. Bivens\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARMS.1990.67976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed on three different surface mounted designs: a leadless chip carrier, gull-wing chip carrier, and compliant S-lead leadless chip carrier. The output of the FEA was input into the Coffin-Manson model, and the number of thermal cycles to failure was estimated. The results indicated that the gull-wing and S-leads chip carriers would be reliable when placed in this temperature environment but the leadless chip carriers would have reliability problems after a short period of time.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":383597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1990.67976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Proceedings on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1990.67976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting time-to-failure using finite element analysis
Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed on three different surface mounted designs: a leadless chip carrier, gull-wing chip carrier, and compliant S-lead leadless chip carrier. The output of the FEA was input into the Coffin-Manson model, and the number of thermal cycles to failure was estimated. The results indicated that the gull-wing and S-leads chip carriers would be reliable when placed in this temperature environment but the leadless chip carriers would have reliability problems after a short period of time.<>