对神经外科错误问题的探讨。文献综述

P. Shnyakin, P. G. Rudenko, A. Botov, A. S. Loseva
{"title":"对神经外科错误问题的探讨。文献综述","authors":"P. Shnyakin, P. G. Rudenko, A. Botov, A. S. Loseva","doi":"10.33920/med-01-2302-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among all adverse perioperative events, medical error is one of the most serious, associated with possible complications for the patient, severe psychological trauma for the surgeon, and often with the involvement of the Investigative Committee in assessing the results of treatment. At the same time, among the researchers of this issue there is still no consensus on what exactly is meant by «medical error». In modern legal scientific publications, they often call for abandoning this term and using the concept of «negligence» for lawyers. It is all the more important in the professional community to define the concept of «medical error» and distinguish it from other undesirable events associated with the treatment of the patient. This review presents different approaches to the definition of the concepts of «medical error» and «surgical error», what is their main difference from iatrogenic, medical negligence, complications of surgery. Some classifications of errors in surgery are presented. The most common factors of surgical errors are identified, such as lack of competence and experience of the doctor, impaired interaction and communication of staff, excessive workload and fatigue, emergency operations, unusual patient anatomy, lack of necessary equipment and instruments. Using the example of neurosurgical practice, such errors as performing a craniotomy on the wrong side, surgery on the spine at the wrong level, leaving foreign bodies in the wound, and others are considered. In conclusion, the main measures for the prevention of errors in surgery in general and in neurosurgery in particular are described.","PeriodicalId":447580,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To the discussion of the problem of errors in neurosurgery. Literature review\",\"authors\":\"P. Shnyakin, P. G. Rudenko, A. Botov, A. S. Loseva\",\"doi\":\"10.33920/med-01-2302-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among all adverse perioperative events, medical error is one of the most serious, associated with possible complications for the patient, severe psychological trauma for the surgeon, and often with the involvement of the Investigative Committee in assessing the results of treatment. At the same time, among the researchers of this issue there is still no consensus on what exactly is meant by «medical error». In modern legal scientific publications, they often call for abandoning this term and using the concept of «negligence» for lawyers. It is all the more important in the professional community to define the concept of «medical error» and distinguish it from other undesirable events associated with the treatment of the patient. This review presents different approaches to the definition of the concepts of «medical error» and «surgical error», what is their main difference from iatrogenic, medical negligence, complications of surgery. Some classifications of errors in surgery are presented. The most common factors of surgical errors are identified, such as lack of competence and experience of the doctor, impaired interaction and communication of staff, excessive workload and fatigue, emergency operations, unusual patient anatomy, lack of necessary equipment and instruments. Using the example of neurosurgical practice, such errors as performing a craniotomy on the wrong side, surgery on the spine at the wrong level, leaving foreign bodies in the wound, and others are considered. In conclusion, the main measures for the prevention of errors in surgery in general and in neurosurgery in particular are described.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2302-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2302-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在所有围手术期不良事件中,医疗差错是最严重的事件之一,它与患者可能出现的并发症、外科医生严重的心理创伤以及调查委员会对治疗结果的评估有关。与此同时,在这个问题的研究人员中,对于“医疗差错”的确切含义仍然没有达成共识。在现代法律科学出版物中,他们经常呼吁放弃这一术语,并对律师使用“疏忽”的概念。在专业社区中,定义“医疗错误”的概念并将其与其他与患者治疗相关的不良事件区分开来尤为重要。这篇综述提出了对“医疗错误”和“手术错误”概念定义的不同方法,它们与医源性、医疗疏忽、手术并发症的主要区别是什么。介绍了手术错误的几种分类。确定了造成手术错误的最常见因素,如医生缺乏能力和经验、工作人员的互动和沟通受损、工作量过大和疲劳、紧急手术、病人解剖异常、缺乏必要的设备和仪器。以神经外科实践为例,在错误的一侧进行开颅手术,在错误的水平上对脊柱进行手术,在伤口中留下异物等错误都被考虑在内。最后,总结了预防外科手术失误的主要措施,特别是神经外科手术失误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To the discussion of the problem of errors in neurosurgery. Literature review
Among all adverse perioperative events, medical error is one of the most serious, associated with possible complications for the patient, severe psychological trauma for the surgeon, and often with the involvement of the Investigative Committee in assessing the results of treatment. At the same time, among the researchers of this issue there is still no consensus on what exactly is meant by «medical error». In modern legal scientific publications, they often call for abandoning this term and using the concept of «negligence» for lawyers. It is all the more important in the professional community to define the concept of «medical error» and distinguish it from other undesirable events associated with the treatment of the patient. This review presents different approaches to the definition of the concepts of «medical error» and «surgical error», what is their main difference from iatrogenic, medical negligence, complications of surgery. Some classifications of errors in surgery are presented. The most common factors of surgical errors are identified, such as lack of competence and experience of the doctor, impaired interaction and communication of staff, excessive workload and fatigue, emergency operations, unusual patient anatomy, lack of necessary equipment and instruments. Using the example of neurosurgical practice, such errors as performing a craniotomy on the wrong side, surgery on the spine at the wrong level, leaving foreign bodies in the wound, and others are considered. In conclusion, the main measures for the prevention of errors in surgery in general and in neurosurgery in particular are described.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etiology and pathogenesis of mental disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis: anxiety, psychotic, and personality disorders, chemical addictions, pathological affect Neurosurgical approach to the treatment of otorhinogenic brain abscess (a clinical case) Role of neurotrophic growth factors in vincristine polyneuropathy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Ultrasound assessment of blood flow in the median nerve in normal conditions and in carpal tunnel syndrome A correlation between anxiety-depressive symptoms and immune-metabolic parameters in patients with mixed anxiety and depressive disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1