Sylvia Szabo, Thilini Navaratne, Seree Park, I. Pal, Gregory S. Cooper
{"title":"三角洲与沿海地区粮食安全指标研究综述","authors":"Sylvia Szabo, Thilini Navaratne, Seree Park, I. Pal, Gregory S. Cooper","doi":"10.1079/cabireviews202217035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Delta regions occupy a small proportion of the earth’s surface area, yet they are home to more than 500 million people. While numerous regional studies have examined the prevalence and the determinants of food security in specific delta and coastal regions, there is still a paucity of systematic analysis on the food security indicators commonly used by scientists and policymakers. To fill this gap, we carried out a systematic review using Covidence, a Cochrane-adopted systematic review processing software. Only scientific papers were considered for review, and the search was conducted in the following databases: SCOPUS, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Following screening for duplicates, relevance, and full-text eligibility, 80 articles were retained for review. In total, 143 different food security indicators were identified (excluding duplicates), with measures of food availability featuring in 27% of reviewed papers. In contrast, indicators capturing the stability of food security were the least commonly applied (8% of reviewed papers). Furthermore, we find a weak level of alignment between deltaic food security indicators and the SDG 2 indicators, only two targets and their indicators were directly aligned in the papers reviewed. Therefore, in order to achieve the aspirational goal of zero hunger in delta regions and worldwide, we suggest researchers and policymakers directly align their choice of food security indicators with those of SDG 2, whilst simultaneously increasing the diversity of indicators to better capture the utilization and stability of food security in an ever-changing and more chaotic climate.","PeriodicalId":399225,"journal":{"name":"CABI Reviews","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food security indicators in deltaic and coastal research: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Szabo, Thilini Navaratne, Seree Park, I. Pal, Gregory S. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1079/cabireviews202217035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Delta regions occupy a small proportion of the earth’s surface area, yet they are home to more than 500 million people. While numerous regional studies have examined the prevalence and the determinants of food security in specific delta and coastal regions, there is still a paucity of systematic analysis on the food security indicators commonly used by scientists and policymakers. To fill this gap, we carried out a systematic review using Covidence, a Cochrane-adopted systematic review processing software. Only scientific papers were considered for review, and the search was conducted in the following databases: SCOPUS, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Following screening for duplicates, relevance, and full-text eligibility, 80 articles were retained for review. In total, 143 different food security indicators were identified (excluding duplicates), with measures of food availability featuring in 27% of reviewed papers. In contrast, indicators capturing the stability of food security were the least commonly applied (8% of reviewed papers). Furthermore, we find a weak level of alignment between deltaic food security indicators and the SDG 2 indicators, only two targets and their indicators were directly aligned in the papers reviewed. Therefore, in order to achieve the aspirational goal of zero hunger in delta regions and worldwide, we suggest researchers and policymakers directly align their choice of food security indicators with those of SDG 2, whilst simultaneously increasing the diversity of indicators to better capture the utilization and stability of food security in an ever-changing and more chaotic climate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CABI Reviews\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CABI Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews202217035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CABI Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews202217035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
三角洲地区只占地球表面积的一小部分,却居住着5亿多人口。虽然许多区域研究调查了特定三角洲和沿海地区粮食安全的普遍性和决定因素,但科学家和政策制定者常用的粮食安全指标仍然缺乏系统分析。为了填补这一空白,我们使用cochrane采用的系统评价处理软件covid - ence进行了系统评价。仅考虑科学论文进行审查,并在以下数据库中进行搜索:SCOPUS, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Science Direct, ProQuest和Google Scholar。在对重复、相关性和全文资格进行筛选后,80篇文章被保留以供审查。总共确定了143个不同的粮食安全指标(不包括重复指标),其中27%的被审查论文以粮食可获得性指标为特色。相比之下,反映粮食安全稳定性的指标最不常用(占审评论文的8%)。此外,我们发现三角洲粮食安全指标与可持续发展目标2指标之间的一致性较弱,在所审查的论文中,只有两个目标及其指标直接一致。因此,为了在三角洲地区和全球范围内实现零饥饿的理想目标,我们建议研究人员和政策制定者直接将粮食安全指标的选择与可持续发展目标2保持一致,同时增加指标的多样性,以更好地反映在不断变化和更加混乱的气候下粮食安全的利用和稳定性。
Food security indicators in deltaic and coastal research: a scoping review
Delta regions occupy a small proportion of the earth’s surface area, yet they are home to more than 500 million people. While numerous regional studies have examined the prevalence and the determinants of food security in specific delta and coastal regions, there is still a paucity of systematic analysis on the food security indicators commonly used by scientists and policymakers. To fill this gap, we carried out a systematic review using Covidence, a Cochrane-adopted systematic review processing software. Only scientific papers were considered for review, and the search was conducted in the following databases: SCOPUS, Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Following screening for duplicates, relevance, and full-text eligibility, 80 articles were retained for review. In total, 143 different food security indicators were identified (excluding duplicates), with measures of food availability featuring in 27% of reviewed papers. In contrast, indicators capturing the stability of food security were the least commonly applied (8% of reviewed papers). Furthermore, we find a weak level of alignment between deltaic food security indicators and the SDG 2 indicators, only two targets and their indicators were directly aligned in the papers reviewed. Therefore, in order to achieve the aspirational goal of zero hunger in delta regions and worldwide, we suggest researchers and policymakers directly align their choice of food security indicators with those of SDG 2, whilst simultaneously increasing the diversity of indicators to better capture the utilization and stability of food security in an ever-changing and more chaotic climate.