VR中光标偏移量在三维选择中的评价

Jialei Li, Isaac Cho, Z. Wartell
{"title":"VR中光标偏移量在三维选择中的评价","authors":"Jialei Li, Isaac Cho, Z. Wartell","doi":"10.1145/3267782.3267797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object selection in a head-mounted display system has been studied extensively. Although most previous work indicates that users perform better when selecting with minimum offset added to the cursor, it is often not possible to directly select objects that are out of arm's reach. Thus, it is not clear whether offset-based techniques will result in improved overall performance. Moreover, due to the difference in muscle requirements of arm and shoulder between a hand-held device and a motion capture device, selection performance may be affected by factors related to ergonomics of the input device. In order to explore these uncertainties, we conduct a user study to evaluate the effects of four virtual cursor offset techniques on 3D object selection performance using Fitts' model and ISO 9241-9 standard while comparing two input devices in a head-mounted display. The results show that selection with No Offset is most efficient when the target is within reach. When the target is out of reach, Linear Offset outperforms Fixed-Length Offset and Go-Go Offset on movement time, error rate and effective throughput, as well as subjective preference evaluation. Overall, the Razer Hydra controller provides better and more stable selection performance than Leap Motion.","PeriodicalId":126671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Cursor Offset on 3D Selection in VR\",\"authors\":\"Jialei Li, Isaac Cho, Z. Wartell\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3267782.3267797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Object selection in a head-mounted display system has been studied extensively. Although most previous work indicates that users perform better when selecting with minimum offset added to the cursor, it is often not possible to directly select objects that are out of arm's reach. Thus, it is not clear whether offset-based techniques will result in improved overall performance. Moreover, due to the difference in muscle requirements of arm and shoulder between a hand-held device and a motion capture device, selection performance may be affected by factors related to ergonomics of the input device. In order to explore these uncertainties, we conduct a user study to evaluate the effects of four virtual cursor offset techniques on 3D object selection performance using Fitts' model and ISO 9241-9 standard while comparing two input devices in a head-mounted display. The results show that selection with No Offset is most efficient when the target is within reach. When the target is out of reach, Linear Offset outperforms Fixed-Length Offset and Go-Go Offset on movement time, error rate and effective throughput, as well as subjective preference evaluation. Overall, the Razer Hydra controller provides better and more stable selection performance than Leap Motion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3267782.3267797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3267782.3267797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

头戴式显示系统中的对象选择问题已经得到了广泛的研究。虽然大多数先前的工作表明,用户在选择光标时添加最小偏移量时表现更好,但通常不可能直接选择手臂够不到的对象。因此,目前尚不清楚基于偏移的技术是否会导致整体性能的提高。此外,由于手持设备和动作捕捉设备对手臂和肩部肌肉的需求不同,选择性能可能会受到输入设备的人体工程学相关因素的影响。为了探索这些不确定性,我们进行了一项用户研究,使用Fitts模型和ISO 9241-9标准来评估四种虚拟光标偏移技术对3D对象选择性能的影响,同时比较了头戴式显示器中的两种输入设备。结果表明,当目标在可及范围内时,无偏移选择是最有效的。当目标遥不可及时,线性偏移在移动时间、错误率和有效吞吐量以及主观偏好评价方面都优于定长偏移和Go-Go偏移。总体而言,雷蛇Hydra控制器提供了比Leap Motion更好和更稳定的选择性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Cursor Offset on 3D Selection in VR
Object selection in a head-mounted display system has been studied extensively. Although most previous work indicates that users perform better when selecting with minimum offset added to the cursor, it is often not possible to directly select objects that are out of arm's reach. Thus, it is not clear whether offset-based techniques will result in improved overall performance. Moreover, due to the difference in muscle requirements of arm and shoulder between a hand-held device and a motion capture device, selection performance may be affected by factors related to ergonomics of the input device. In order to explore these uncertainties, we conduct a user study to evaluate the effects of four virtual cursor offset techniques on 3D object selection performance using Fitts' model and ISO 9241-9 standard while comparing two input devices in a head-mounted display. The results show that selection with No Offset is most efficient when the target is within reach. When the target is out of reach, Linear Offset outperforms Fixed-Length Offset and Go-Go Offset on movement time, error rate and effective throughput, as well as subjective preference evaluation. Overall, the Razer Hydra controller provides better and more stable selection performance than Leap Motion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Potential and Challenges of VR Prototyping in Fashion Design Air Maestros: A Multi-User Audiovisual Experience Using MR An Emotional Spatial Handwriting System Haptopus: Transferring the Touch Sense of the Hand to the Face Using Suction Mechanism Embedded in HMD Virtual Campus: Infrastructure and spatiality management tools based on 3D environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1