多架无人机时变目标定位方法的比较研究:卡尔曼估计与三角测量技术

G. York, D. Pack
{"title":"多架无人机时变目标定位方法的比较研究:卡尔曼估计与三角测量技术","authors":"G. York, D. Pack","doi":"10.1109/ICNSC.2005.1461206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate two different methods to search, detect, and locate mobile radio frequency (RF) targets using multiple cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles (VAVs). The primary difference between the two methods is the target localization technique used: the Kalman estimation technique and the triangulation technique. We compare the two methods on the basis of the total task completion time and the total average target location accuracy. The qualitative results generated by a graphical simulator are presented as a part of our comparison study.","PeriodicalId":313251,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Networking, Sensing and Control, 2005.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study on time-varying target localization methods using multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: Kalman estimation and triangulation techniques\",\"authors\":\"G. York, D. Pack\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNSC.2005.1461206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we evaluate two different methods to search, detect, and locate mobile radio frequency (RF) targets using multiple cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles (VAVs). The primary difference between the two methods is the target localization technique used: the Kalman estimation technique and the triangulation technique. We compare the two methods on the basis of the total task completion time and the total average target location accuracy. The qualitative results generated by a graphical simulator are presented as a part of our comparison study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Networking, Sensing and Control, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Networking, Sensing and Control, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2005.1461206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Networking, Sensing and Control, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC.2005.1461206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

在本文中,我们评估了两种不同的方法来搜索,探测和定位移动射频(RF)目标使用多个协作无人机(vav)。两种方法的主要区别在于所使用的目标定位技术:卡尔曼估计技术和三角测量技术。我们根据总任务完成时间和总平均目标定位精度对两种方法进行比较。图形模拟器产生的定性结果是我们比较研究的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study on time-varying target localization methods using multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: Kalman estimation and triangulation techniques
In this paper, we evaluate two different methods to search, detect, and locate mobile radio frequency (RF) targets using multiple cooperative unmanned aerial vehicles (VAVs). The primary difference between the two methods is the target localization technique used: the Kalman estimation technique and the triangulation technique. We compare the two methods on the basis of the total task completion time and the total average target location accuracy. The qualitative results generated by a graphical simulator are presented as a part of our comparison study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stochastic robust stability analysis for Markovian jumping neural networks with time delays Modeling and performance evaluation of collision resolution algorithms for LonWorks control networks The organization model research of SM crowd Forced and constrained consensus among cooperating agents Routing in stochastic networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1