一项评估心脏手术后康复团队心脏骤停和胸腔切开模拟训练有效性的前瞻性队列研究

Andrew Keogan, R. Maier, Molly Hagen
{"title":"一项评估心脏手术后康复团队心脏骤停和胸腔切开模拟训练有效性的前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Andrew Keogan, R. Maier, Molly Hagen","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The management of cardiac arrest in after cardiac surgery requires resuscitative efforts that deviate from the established American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines (ACLS) guidelines. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery have established guidelines for managing cardiac arrest and resternotomy in these patients and recommend regular practice by the multidisciplinary recovery team. This study, conducted at a single institution, aimed to identify areas of deficiency in knowledge of STS guidelines and evaluate the effects of simulation on comfort with the procedure and perceived value of training. Methods: A before and after study was performed whereby participants were given hands-on resternotomy training and completed preand post-training surveys that assessed knowledge of the STS protocol, comfort level, and value perception. The training, simulation, and survey were conducted in a clinical simulation laboratory. Study participants included registered nurses, attending physicians, resident physicians, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists. The training consisted of a lecture followed by a high-fidelity simulation of a cardiac arrest leading to bedside surgical exploration utilizing a resternotomy manikin. Results: Participants’ baseline scores of knowledge of STS guidelines averaged 53.3%. This average increased to 81.3% after training, with improvement on four of the six knowledge questions achieving statistical significance (P 5 0.001 in all cases). Participant comfort with the STS protocol and the resternotomy procedure increased significantly (both P 5 0.0001), as well as value perceptions of the simulation training (P 5 0.03) and utilizing a resternotomy capable manikin (P 5 0.02). Conclusions: Participants’ inadequate knowledge of STS guidelines suggests that delivering education to all post-cardiac surgery team members would be beneficial and is desired by clinicians. High-fidelity resternotomy simulation has favorable effects on participant comfort and their perceived value of training and can be made affordable by modifying widely available supplies.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective cohort study evaluating the effectiveness of cardiac arrest and resternotomy simulation training of the post-cardiac surgery recovery team\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Keogan, R. Maier, Molly Hagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The management of cardiac arrest in after cardiac surgery requires resuscitative efforts that deviate from the established American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines (ACLS) guidelines. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery have established guidelines for managing cardiac arrest and resternotomy in these patients and recommend regular practice by the multidisciplinary recovery team. This study, conducted at a single institution, aimed to identify areas of deficiency in knowledge of STS guidelines and evaluate the effects of simulation on comfort with the procedure and perceived value of training. Methods: A before and after study was performed whereby participants were given hands-on resternotomy training and completed preand post-training surveys that assessed knowledge of the STS protocol, comfort level, and value perception. The training, simulation, and survey were conducted in a clinical simulation laboratory. Study participants included registered nurses, attending physicians, resident physicians, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists. The training consisted of a lecture followed by a high-fidelity simulation of a cardiac arrest leading to bedside surgical exploration utilizing a resternotomy manikin. Results: Participants’ baseline scores of knowledge of STS guidelines averaged 53.3%. This average increased to 81.3% after training, with improvement on four of the six knowledge questions achieving statistical significance (P 5 0.001 in all cases). Participant comfort with the STS protocol and the resternotomy procedure increased significantly (both P 5 0.0001), as well as value perceptions of the simulation training (P 5 0.03) and utilizing a resternotomy capable manikin (P 5 0.02). Conclusions: Participants’ inadequate knowledge of STS guidelines suggests that delivering education to all post-cardiac surgery team members would be beneficial and is desired by clinicians. High-fidelity resternotomy simulation has favorable effects on participant comfort and their perceived value of training and can be made affordable by modifying widely available supplies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心脏手术后心脏骤停的处理需要复苏的努力,偏离了既定的美国心脏协会高级心脏生命支持指南(ACLS)指南。胸外科学会(STS)和欧洲心胸外科协会已经制定了处理这些患者的心脏骤停和胸骨切开术的指南,并建议多学科康复团队定期实践。这项研究是在一个单一的机构进行的,旨在确定在STS指南知识方面的不足之处,并评估模拟对程序的舒适度和培训的感知价值的影响。方法:在研究前和研究后,参与者接受了实际的胸骨切开术培训,并完成了培训前和培训后的调查,以评估STS方案的知识、舒适度和价值感知。培训、模拟和调查在临床模拟实验室进行。研究参与者包括注册护士、主治医师、住院医师、药剂师和呼吸治疗师。培训包括一个讲座,随后是一个高保真模拟心脏骤停,导致床边手术探查利用胸骨切开术假人。结果:参与者STS指南知识基线得分平均为53.3%。这一平均值在训练后增加到81.3%,6个知识问题中的4个问题的改善达到了统计学意义(所有情况下的p5 0.001)。参与者对STS方案和胸骨切开术的舒适度显著增加(P均为0.0001),对模拟训练的价值感知(P均为0.03)和使用胸骨切开术的人体模型(P均为0.05)也显著增加。结论:参与者对STS指南的知识不足表明,向所有心脏手术后团队成员提供教育是有益的,也是临床医生所希望的。高保真胸骨切开术模拟对参与者的舒适度和他们对训练的感知价值有良好的影响,并且可以通过修改广泛可用的供应而使其负担得起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A prospective cohort study evaluating the effectiveness of cardiac arrest and resternotomy simulation training of the post-cardiac surgery recovery team
Objective: The management of cardiac arrest in after cardiac surgery requires resuscitative efforts that deviate from the established American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines (ACLS) guidelines. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery have established guidelines for managing cardiac arrest and resternotomy in these patients and recommend regular practice by the multidisciplinary recovery team. This study, conducted at a single institution, aimed to identify areas of deficiency in knowledge of STS guidelines and evaluate the effects of simulation on comfort with the procedure and perceived value of training. Methods: A before and after study was performed whereby participants were given hands-on resternotomy training and completed preand post-training surveys that assessed knowledge of the STS protocol, comfort level, and value perception. The training, simulation, and survey were conducted in a clinical simulation laboratory. Study participants included registered nurses, attending physicians, resident physicians, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists. The training consisted of a lecture followed by a high-fidelity simulation of a cardiac arrest leading to bedside surgical exploration utilizing a resternotomy manikin. Results: Participants’ baseline scores of knowledge of STS guidelines averaged 53.3%. This average increased to 81.3% after training, with improvement on four of the six knowledge questions achieving statistical significance (P 5 0.001 in all cases). Participant comfort with the STS protocol and the resternotomy procedure increased significantly (both P 5 0.0001), as well as value perceptions of the simulation training (P 5 0.03) and utilizing a resternotomy capable manikin (P 5 0.02). Conclusions: Participants’ inadequate knowledge of STS guidelines suggests that delivering education to all post-cardiac surgery team members would be beneficial and is desired by clinicians. High-fidelity resternotomy simulation has favorable effects on participant comfort and their perceived value of training and can be made affordable by modifying widely available supplies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1