重新考虑识字

A. Powers, M. Powers
{"title":"重新考虑识字","authors":"A. Powers, M. Powers","doi":"10.5703/1288284317184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literacy, until recently, was defined as the ability to read printed text and to\n understand the nuances of both the form and content of that printed text. More recently\n there has been a focus on subsets of literacy – data literacy, numeracy, visual\n literacy, media literacy, etc. – that recognizes the means of communicating ideas and\n facts are not limited to the printed text and that there are multiple means which may be\n more powerful ways of communicating in our world. In recent years, higher education has\n been redefining what it means to be educated – from a focus on specific bodies of\n knowledge, or disciplines, to a focus on developing and mastering skills for varying\n modes of inquiry. Simultaneously, there has been a growing focus on expanding how\n students and faculty communicate knowledge – what was once strictly the term paper\n approach is being replaced by the oral presentation, the poster session, or the artistic\n response. In a world where ideas are more readily communicated via social media such as\n YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter, the ability to accurately assess additional\n modes of communication is critical. This paper will explore different subsets of\n literacy, describe a method for developing mastery of those literacies in higher\n education, and advocate for academic library professionals to become specialists focused\n on literacies as much, if not more, than on content.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering Literacy\",\"authors\":\"A. Powers, M. Powers\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/1288284317184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Literacy, until recently, was defined as the ability to read printed text and to\\n understand the nuances of both the form and content of that printed text. More recently\\n there has been a focus on subsets of literacy – data literacy, numeracy, visual\\n literacy, media literacy, etc. – that recognizes the means of communicating ideas and\\n facts are not limited to the printed text and that there are multiple means which may be\\n more powerful ways of communicating in our world. In recent years, higher education has\\n been redefining what it means to be educated – from a focus on specific bodies of\\n knowledge, or disciplines, to a focus on developing and mastering skills for varying\\n modes of inquiry. Simultaneously, there has been a growing focus on expanding how\\n students and faculty communicate knowledge – what was once strictly the term paper\\n approach is being replaced by the oral presentation, the poster session, or the artistic\\n response. In a world where ideas are more readily communicated via social media such as\\n YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter, the ability to accurately assess additional\\n modes of communication is critical. This paper will explore different subsets of\\n literacy, describe a method for developing mastery of those literacies in higher\\n education, and advocate for academic library professionals to become specialists focused\\n on literacies as much, if not more, than on content.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\\\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\\\"\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\\\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到最近,读写能力被定义为阅读印刷文本并理解印刷文本形式和内容的细微差别的能力。最近,人们开始关注读写能力的子集- -数据读写能力、计算能力、视觉读写能力、媒体读写能力等- -认识到交流思想和事实的手段不仅限于印刷文本,而且在我们的世界中还有多种可能更强大的交流方式。近年来,高等教育一直在重新定义“受教育”的含义——从专注于特定的知识体系或学科,转向专注于发展和掌握各种探究模式的技能。与此同时,人们越来越关注扩大学生和教师交流知识的方式——曾经严格的学期论文方式正在被口头报告、海报会议或艺术回应所取代。在一个思想更容易通过YouTube、Instagram、Facebook和Twitter等社交媒体交流的世界里,准确评估其他交流模式的能力至关重要。本文将探讨读写能力的不同子集,描述一种在高等教育中培养对这些读写能力的掌握的方法,并倡导学术图书馆专业人员成为关注读写能力的专家,如果不是更多的话,就像关注内容一样多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconsidering Literacy
Literacy, until recently, was defined as the ability to read printed text and to understand the nuances of both the form and content of that printed text. More recently there has been a focus on subsets of literacy – data literacy, numeracy, visual literacy, media literacy, etc. – that recognizes the means of communicating ideas and facts are not limited to the printed text and that there are multiple means which may be more powerful ways of communicating in our world. In recent years, higher education has been redefining what it means to be educated – from a focus on specific bodies of knowledge, or disciplines, to a focus on developing and mastering skills for varying modes of inquiry. Simultaneously, there has been a growing focus on expanding how students and faculty communicate knowledge – what was once strictly the term paper approach is being replaced by the oral presentation, the poster session, or the artistic response. In a world where ideas are more readily communicated via social media such as YouTube, Instagram, Facebook and Twitter, the ability to accurately assess additional modes of communication is critical. This paper will explore different subsets of literacy, describe a method for developing mastery of those literacies in higher education, and advocate for academic library professionals to become specialists focused on literacies as much, if not more, than on content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Synthesis: Research Resources to Research Experiences The Time Has Come... To Build, Reflect, and Analyze Connections Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collections Data, Tools, and Strategy: Applying R, Tableau, and Excel to Print Assessment Acquiring E-books – Does (Should) Workflow Play a Role? A Collaborative Imperative? Libraries and the Emerging Scholarly Communication Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1