正式学费的影响,监督实践和反馈对获得基本腹腔镜技能的新手使用一个盒子教练

Mathew Lyons, O. Brown, B. Ip
{"title":"正式学费的影响,监督实践和反馈对获得基本腹腔镜技能的新手使用一个盒子教练","authors":"Mathew Lyons, O. Brown, B. Ip","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Laparoscopic box trainers are valuable in the teaching of basic laparoscopic skills. This study aims to define the impact of formal tuition, supervised practice and feedback on the acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills on a box trainer by novice. Methods: All medical undergraduate attendees of a conference were invited to participate. Participants with previous experience on laparoscopic simulators were excluded. Twenty-eight were randomized to the control group (self-directed learning/practice), 23 to the intervention group (formal tuition/supervised practice/feedback). Baseline and post-intervention performance were assessed using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score by blinded assessors. Results: Both groups showed an overall increase in GOALS score after exposure to the box trainer: control group, 7.79 (SD, 2.23) pre-intervention versus 8.25 (SD 3.04) postintervention; intervention group: 8.43 (SD 2.13) pre-intervention versus 9.35 (SD 2.42) post-intervention (P=0.52). The intervention group showed a greater overall increase in GOALS score compared with the control group, but this was not statistically significant (control mean improvement, + 0.46 [SD 4.08] versus intervention mean improvement + 0.91 [SD 3.84]; P=0.66). A lower performance in depth perception was reported for the control group (mean, 0.07). Conclusions: Box trainers are effective in assisting novices to acquire basic laparoscopic skills. Expert tuition, supervised practice and feedback appear to have an additional positive effect.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of formal tuition, supervised practice and feedback on the acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills by novices using a box trainer\",\"authors\":\"Mathew Lyons, O. Brown, B. Ip\",\"doi\":\"10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Laparoscopic box trainers are valuable in the teaching of basic laparoscopic skills. This study aims to define the impact of formal tuition, supervised practice and feedback on the acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills on a box trainer by novice. Methods: All medical undergraduate attendees of a conference were invited to participate. Participants with previous experience on laparoscopic simulators were excluded. Twenty-eight were randomized to the control group (self-directed learning/practice), 23 to the intervention group (formal tuition/supervised practice/feedback). Baseline and post-intervention performance were assessed using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score by blinded assessors. Results: Both groups showed an overall increase in GOALS score after exposure to the box trainer: control group, 7.79 (SD, 2.23) pre-intervention versus 8.25 (SD 3.04) postintervention; intervention group: 8.43 (SD 2.13) pre-intervention versus 9.35 (SD 2.42) post-intervention (P=0.52). The intervention group showed a greater overall increase in GOALS score compared with the control group, but this was not statistically significant (control mean improvement, + 0.46 [SD 4.08] versus intervention mean improvement + 0.91 [SD 3.84]; P=0.66). A lower performance in depth perception was reported for the control group (mean, 0.07). Conclusions: Box trainers are effective in assisting novices to acquire basic laparoscopic skills. Expert tuition, supervised practice and feedback appear to have an additional positive effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:腹腔镜训练师在腹腔镜基本技能教学中具有重要的应用价值。本研究的目的是确定正式的学费,监督实践和反馈对获得基本腹腔镜技能的箱子教练新手的影响。方法:邀请所有医学本科生参加会议。先前有腹腔镜模拟器经验的参与者被排除在外。28人随机分为对照组(自主学习/实践),23人分为干预组(正式教学/监督实践/反馈)。基线和干预后的表现由盲法评估者使用全球腹腔镜手术技能评估(GOALS)评分进行评估。结果:两组在接触拳击训练员后,目标得分均有所增加:对照组干预前为7.79 (SD, 2.23),干预后为8.25 (SD, 3.04);干预组:干预前8.43 (SD 2.13),干预后9.35 (SD 2.42) (P=0.52)。与对照组相比,干预组的总体目标评分增加更大,但没有统计学意义(对照组平均改善+ 0.46 [SD 4.08],干预组平均改善+ 0.91 [SD 3.84];P = 0.66)。据报道,对照组在深度感知方面的表现较低(平均值0.07)。结论:盒式训练师能有效地帮助新手掌握腹腔镜基本技能。专家指导,监督练习和反馈似乎有额外的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of formal tuition, supervised practice and feedback on the acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills by novices using a box trainer
Background and Aim: Laparoscopic box trainers are valuable in the teaching of basic laparoscopic skills. This study aims to define the impact of formal tuition, supervised practice and feedback on the acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills on a box trainer by novice. Methods: All medical undergraduate attendees of a conference were invited to participate. Participants with previous experience on laparoscopic simulators were excluded. Twenty-eight were randomized to the control group (self-directed learning/practice), 23 to the intervention group (formal tuition/supervised practice/feedback). Baseline and post-intervention performance were assessed using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score by blinded assessors. Results: Both groups showed an overall increase in GOALS score after exposure to the box trainer: control group, 7.79 (SD, 2.23) pre-intervention versus 8.25 (SD 3.04) postintervention; intervention group: 8.43 (SD 2.13) pre-intervention versus 9.35 (SD 2.42) post-intervention (P=0.52). The intervention group showed a greater overall increase in GOALS score compared with the control group, but this was not statistically significant (control mean improvement, + 0.46 [SD 4.08] versus intervention mean improvement + 0.91 [SD 3.84]; P=0.66). A lower performance in depth perception was reported for the control group (mean, 0.07). Conclusions: Box trainers are effective in assisting novices to acquire basic laparoscopic skills. Expert tuition, supervised practice and feedback appear to have an additional positive effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1