H.265/MPEG-HEVC与VP9的体验质量评价比较效率

N. Ramzan, Zeeshan Pervez, A. Amira
{"title":"H.265/MPEG-HEVC与VP9的体验质量评价比较效率","authors":"N. Ramzan, Zeeshan Pervez, A. Amira","doi":"10.1109/ICM.2014.7071846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a performance evaluation of the three newest video coding standards Advanced Video Coding (H.264/MPEG-AVC), High-Efficiency Video Coding (H.265/MPEG-HEVC) and VP9 on the basis of subjective and objective quality evaluations. The main goal of the encoder is to compress video contents. In this paper, the compression of High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) video contents are studied by above mentioned codecs for different scenarios, such as broadcasting and streaming. An extensive range of bit-rates from low to high bit-rates were selected and encoded the video sequences. of each encoder configuration corresponds to low quality up to excellent quality were compared to original and uncompressed video. Four video sequences were encoded by using same encoding configurations for all the examined video encoders. According to the experimental analysis, HEVC showed a clear supremacy of HEVC encoding algorithm as compared to other alternatives such as AVC and VP9. In addition, VP9 shows competitive results as compared to AVC.","PeriodicalId":107354,"journal":{"name":"2014 26th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of experience evaluation of H.265/MPEG-HEVC and VP9 comparison efficiency\",\"authors\":\"N. Ramzan, Zeeshan Pervez, A. Amira\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICM.2014.7071846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a performance evaluation of the three newest video coding standards Advanced Video Coding (H.264/MPEG-AVC), High-Efficiency Video Coding (H.265/MPEG-HEVC) and VP9 on the basis of subjective and objective quality evaluations. The main goal of the encoder is to compress video contents. In this paper, the compression of High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) video contents are studied by above mentioned codecs for different scenarios, such as broadcasting and streaming. An extensive range of bit-rates from low to high bit-rates were selected and encoded the video sequences. of each encoder configuration corresponds to low quality up to excellent quality were compared to original and uncompressed video. Four video sequences were encoded by using same encoding configurations for all the examined video encoders. According to the experimental analysis, HEVC showed a clear supremacy of HEVC encoding algorithm as compared to other alternatives such as AVC and VP9. In addition, VP9 shows competitive results as compared to AVC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 26th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 26th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICM.2014.7071846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 26th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICM.2014.7071846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

在主客观质量评价的基础上,对先进视频编码(H.264/MPEG-AVC)、高效视频编码(H.265/MPEG-HEVC)和VP9三种最新视频编码标准进行了性能评价。编码器的主要目的是压缩视频内容。本文主要针对广播和流媒体等不同场景,利用上述编解码器对高清(HD)和超高清(UHD)视频内容进行压缩研究。从低比特率到高比特率的广泛范围被选择和编码的视频序列。每个编码器配置对应的低质量到高质量的原始和未压缩视频进行了比较。四个视频序列通过使用相同的编码配置对所有检查的视频编码器进行编码。实验分析表明,HEVC编码算法与AVC、VP9等其他替代算法相比,具有明显的优越性。此外,VP9显示出与AVC相比具有竞争力的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of experience evaluation of H.265/MPEG-HEVC and VP9 comparison efficiency
This paper presents a performance evaluation of the three newest video coding standards Advanced Video Coding (H.264/MPEG-AVC), High-Efficiency Video Coding (H.265/MPEG-HEVC) and VP9 on the basis of subjective and objective quality evaluations. The main goal of the encoder is to compress video contents. In this paper, the compression of High Definition (HD) and Ultra High Definition (UHD) video contents are studied by above mentioned codecs for different scenarios, such as broadcasting and streaming. An extensive range of bit-rates from low to high bit-rates were selected and encoded the video sequences. of each encoder configuration corresponds to low quality up to excellent quality were compared to original and uncompressed video. Four video sequences were encoded by using same encoding configurations for all the examined video encoders. According to the experimental analysis, HEVC showed a clear supremacy of HEVC encoding algorithm as compared to other alternatives such as AVC and VP9. In addition, VP9 shows competitive results as compared to AVC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haralick features for GEI-based human gait recognition Haralick feature extraction from time-frequency images for epileptic seizure detection and classification of EEG data LVDS receiver with 7mW consumption at 1.5 Gbps Concatenation of dictionaries for recovery of ECG signals using compressed sensing techniques Effect of device, size, activation energy, temperature, and frequency on memristor switching time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1