学术图书馆奖学金之评鉴框架之建议

R. Borchardt, Polly D. Boruff-Jones, Sigrid Kelsey, Jennifer K. Matthews
{"title":"学术图书馆奖学金之评鉴框架之建议","authors":"R. Borchardt, Polly D. Boruff-Jones, Sigrid Kelsey, Jennifer K. Matthews","doi":"10.5703/1288284317195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ACRL Impactful Scholarship and Metrics Task Force has created a framework\n draft that is designed to help librarians and libraries contextualize their impact\n within academic librarianship. To create this framework, the task force studied existing\n disciplinary models, institutional guidelines, and surveyed academic librarians. The\n task force discovered few standard practices regarding impact measurement from\n disciplinary societies or in institutional documentation, but did find some larger\n models outlining distinct impact areas. The proposed framework outlines evaluation in\n two primary impact areas for academic librarians, scholarly and practitioner impact,\n with suggested metrics for a range of research outputs in each category. It is\n envisioned that this framework will help initiate conversations at institutions with the\n aim of reviewing and revising existing documentation, alongside complementary ACRL\n initiatives that will similarly affect scholarly production and evaluation. The first\n framework draft was revised based on academic librarian feedback, and could be finalized\n as an ACRL document in 2020.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Proposed Framework for the Evaluation of Academic Librarian Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"R. Borchardt, Polly D. Boruff-Jones, Sigrid Kelsey, Jennifer K. Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/1288284317195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ACRL Impactful Scholarship and Metrics Task Force has created a framework\\n draft that is designed to help librarians and libraries contextualize their impact\\n within academic librarianship. To create this framework, the task force studied existing\\n disciplinary models, institutional guidelines, and surveyed academic librarians. The\\n task force discovered few standard practices regarding impact measurement from\\n disciplinary societies or in institutional documentation, but did find some larger\\n models outlining distinct impact areas. The proposed framework outlines evaluation in\\n two primary impact areas for academic librarians, scholarly and practitioner impact,\\n with suggested metrics for a range of research outputs in each category. It is\\n envisioned that this framework will help initiate conversations at institutions with the\\n aim of reviewing and revising existing documentation, alongside complementary ACRL\\n initiatives that will similarly affect scholarly production and evaluation. The first\\n framework draft was revised based on academic librarian feedback, and could be finalized\\n as an ACRL document in 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\\\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\\\"\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\\\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ACRL影响力奖学金和指标工作组创建了一个框架草案,旨在帮助图书馆员和图书馆将其在学术图书馆事业中的影响置于背景中。为了创建这个框架,工作组研究了现有的学科模型、机构指南,并调查了学术图书馆员。工作组从学科协会或机构文件中发现了很少关于影响测量的标准实践,但确实发现了一些较大的模型,概述了不同的影响领域。拟议的框架概述了对学术图书馆员的两个主要影响领域的评估,即学术影响和从业者影响,并对每个类别的一系列研究成果提出了建议指标。预计该框架将有助于在机构中发起对话,目的是审查和修改现有文件,同时补充ACRL的倡议,这些倡议将同样影响学术生产和评估。第一份框架草案是根据学术图书馆员的反馈进行修改的,并可能在2020年最终确定为ACRL文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Proposed Framework for the Evaluation of Academic Librarian Scholarship
The ACRL Impactful Scholarship and Metrics Task Force has created a framework draft that is designed to help librarians and libraries contextualize their impact within academic librarianship. To create this framework, the task force studied existing disciplinary models, institutional guidelines, and surveyed academic librarians. The task force discovered few standard practices regarding impact measurement from disciplinary societies or in institutional documentation, but did find some larger models outlining distinct impact areas. The proposed framework outlines evaluation in two primary impact areas for academic librarians, scholarly and practitioner impact, with suggested metrics for a range of research outputs in each category. It is envisioned that this framework will help initiate conversations at institutions with the aim of reviewing and revising existing documentation, alongside complementary ACRL initiatives that will similarly affect scholarly production and evaluation. The first framework draft was revised based on academic librarian feedback, and could be finalized as an ACRL document in 2020.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Synthesis: Research Resources to Research Experiences The Time Has Come... To Build, Reflect, and Analyze Connections Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collections Data, Tools, and Strategy: Applying R, Tableau, and Excel to Print Assessment Acquiring E-books – Does (Should) Workflow Play a Role? A Collaborative Imperative? Libraries and the Emerging Scholarly Communication Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1