全球化、法律文化与中澳商事纠纷的处理

R. Tomasic, Ping Xiong
{"title":"全球化、法律文化与中澳商事纠纷的处理","authors":"R. Tomasic, Ping Xiong","doi":"10.1093/CJCL/CXW002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s ‘Go Global’ strategy has encouraged Chinese companies to seek to enhance China’s resource security through acquisitions in foreign markets. Under the influence of this policy, Chinese companies have greatly increased outbound investment in recent years, and one consequence of this increased activity has been the generation of a range of commercial disputes. The choice of different methods of dispute settlement is in part influenced by the national legal cultures that have shaped the mind-sets of parties to these commercial disputes. Recent Chinese investment abroad has grown significantly and increasing economic engagement between China and other countries will inevitably involve some degree of conflict as different legal cultures interact. In understanding points of tension in the Sino-Australian investment relationship questions are raised concerning legal pluralism and the impact of legal culture on Chinese controlled companies operating in Australia. This paper discusses approaches taken in a number of recent commercial disputes involving Chinese companies in Australia and the slow movement that these cases reveal towards a more globalized commercial law.","PeriodicalId":107878,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Globalization, Legal Culture and the Handling of Sino-Australian Commercial Disputes\",\"authors\":\"R. Tomasic, Ping Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CJCL/CXW002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China’s ‘Go Global’ strategy has encouraged Chinese companies to seek to enhance China’s resource security through acquisitions in foreign markets. Under the influence of this policy, Chinese companies have greatly increased outbound investment in recent years, and one consequence of this increased activity has been the generation of a range of commercial disputes. The choice of different methods of dispute settlement is in part influenced by the national legal cultures that have shaped the mind-sets of parties to these commercial disputes. Recent Chinese investment abroad has grown significantly and increasing economic engagement between China and other countries will inevitably involve some degree of conflict as different legal cultures interact. In understanding points of tension in the Sino-Australian investment relationship questions are raised concerning legal pluralism and the impact of legal culture on Chinese controlled companies operating in Australia. This paper discusses approaches taken in a number of recent commercial disputes involving Chinese companies in Australia and the slow movement that these cases reveal towards a more globalized commercial law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CJCL/CXW002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CJCL/CXW002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中国的“走出去”战略鼓励中国企业寻求通过在国外市场的收购来加强中国的资源安全。在这一政策的影响下,中国企业近年来大幅增加了对外投资,而这种活动增加的一个后果是产生了一系列商业纠纷。不同争端解决方法的选择在一定程度上受到国家法律文化的影响,这些法律文化塑造了这些商事争端各方的思维方式。近年来,中国在海外的投资显著增长,随着不同法律文化的互动,中国与其他国家之间日益增加的经济往来将不可避免地涉及某种程度的冲突。在理解中澳投资关系中的紧张点时,提出了有关法律多元化和法律文化对在澳经营的中国控股公司的影响的问题。本文讨论了最近在澳大利亚涉及中国公司的一些商业纠纷所采取的方法,以及这些案件揭示的走向更加全球化的商业法的缓慢运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Globalization, Legal Culture and the Handling of Sino-Australian Commercial Disputes
China’s ‘Go Global’ strategy has encouraged Chinese companies to seek to enhance China’s resource security through acquisitions in foreign markets. Under the influence of this policy, Chinese companies have greatly increased outbound investment in recent years, and one consequence of this increased activity has been the generation of a range of commercial disputes. The choice of different methods of dispute settlement is in part influenced by the national legal cultures that have shaped the mind-sets of parties to these commercial disputes. Recent Chinese investment abroad has grown significantly and increasing economic engagement between China and other countries will inevitably involve some degree of conflict as different legal cultures interact. In understanding points of tension in the Sino-Australian investment relationship questions are raised concerning legal pluralism and the impact of legal culture on Chinese controlled companies operating in Australia. This paper discusses approaches taken in a number of recent commercial disputes involving Chinese companies in Australia and the slow movement that these cases reveal towards a more globalized commercial law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Globalization and Female Economic Participation in MINT and BRICS countries Digital Media Discourse on the Blockage of Huawei by the US Government 2019 World Pensions Forum Held in EU Capital Before G7 Summit Impact of additional equity capital on bank funding costs: Australian evidence Monetary Policy and Financial System Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1