{"title":"特权文书——印度人的观点","authors":"Harshad Pathak","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitution of India broadly provides for five kinds of “prerogative” writs: habeas \ncorpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition. This study \npresents their legal status, namely their application, procedure and grounds for \ntheir application. \nThe study concludes that, in India, the rule of law is supreme and judiciary has \nthe right to interfere whenever there is deviation from this supremacy. The \njudiciary shall ensure that all administrative actions comply with legal limits \nand consider administrative measures to assess whether the authority has \nexercised powers, the authority misused or exceeded its powers, the authority \ncommitted an error of law, the authority violated principles of impartiality of \nthe judiciary, the authority has violated the fundamental rights of individuals. \nThe Judiciary stands to ensure that all administrative actions are confined to \nthe limits of the law and examines administrative action to assess whether the \nauthority has exercised its powers, whether the authority has abused or \nexceeded its powers, whether the authority has committed an error of law, \nwhether the authority has violated the principles of natural justice, whether the \nauthority has infringed the fundamental rights of persons.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prerogative writs - indian perspective\",\"authors\":\"Harshad Pathak\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Constitution of India broadly provides for five kinds of “prerogative” writs: habeas \\ncorpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition. This study \\npresents their legal status, namely their application, procedure and grounds for \\ntheir application. \\nThe study concludes that, in India, the rule of law is supreme and judiciary has \\nthe right to interfere whenever there is deviation from this supremacy. The \\njudiciary shall ensure that all administrative actions comply with legal limits \\nand consider administrative measures to assess whether the authority has \\nexercised powers, the authority misused or exceeded its powers, the authority \\ncommitted an error of law, the authority violated principles of impartiality of \\nthe judiciary, the authority has violated the fundamental rights of individuals. \\nThe Judiciary stands to ensure that all administrative actions are confined to \\nthe limits of the law and examines administrative action to assess whether the \\nauthority has exercised its powers, whether the authority has abused or \\nexceeded its powers, whether the authority has committed an error of law, \\nwhether the authority has violated the principles of natural justice, whether the \\nauthority has infringed the fundamental rights of persons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Constitution of India broadly provides for five kinds of “prerogative” writs: habeas
corpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition. This study
presents their legal status, namely their application, procedure and grounds for
their application.
The study concludes that, in India, the rule of law is supreme and judiciary has
the right to interfere whenever there is deviation from this supremacy. The
judiciary shall ensure that all administrative actions comply with legal limits
and consider administrative measures to assess whether the authority has
exercised powers, the authority misused or exceeded its powers, the authority
committed an error of law, the authority violated principles of impartiality of
the judiciary, the authority has violated the fundamental rights of individuals.
The Judiciary stands to ensure that all administrative actions are confined to
the limits of the law and examines administrative action to assess whether the
authority has exercised its powers, whether the authority has abused or
exceeded its powers, whether the authority has committed an error of law,
whether the authority has violated the principles of natural justice, whether the
authority has infringed the fundamental rights of persons.