特权文书——印度人的观点

Harshad Pathak
{"title":"特权文书——印度人的观点","authors":"Harshad Pathak","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitution of India broadly provides for five kinds of “prerogative” writs: habeas \ncorpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition. This study \npresents their legal status, namely their application, procedure and grounds for \ntheir application. \nThe study concludes that, in India, the rule of law is supreme and judiciary has \nthe right to interfere whenever there is deviation from this supremacy. The \njudiciary shall ensure that all administrative actions comply with legal limits \nand consider administrative measures to assess whether the authority has \nexercised powers, the authority misused or exceeded its powers, the authority \ncommitted an error of law, the authority violated principles of impartiality of \nthe judiciary, the authority has violated the fundamental rights of individuals. \nThe Judiciary stands to ensure that all administrative actions are confined to \nthe limits of the law and examines administrative action to assess whether the \nauthority has exercised its powers, whether the authority has abused or \nexceeded its powers, whether the authority has committed an error of law, \nwhether the authority has violated the principles of natural justice, whether the \nauthority has infringed the fundamental rights of persons.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prerogative writs - indian perspective\",\"authors\":\"Harshad Pathak\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Constitution of India broadly provides for five kinds of “prerogative” writs: habeas \\ncorpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition. This study \\npresents their legal status, namely their application, procedure and grounds for \\ntheir application. \\nThe study concludes that, in India, the rule of law is supreme and judiciary has \\nthe right to interfere whenever there is deviation from this supremacy. The \\njudiciary shall ensure that all administrative actions comply with legal limits \\nand consider administrative measures to assess whether the authority has \\nexercised powers, the authority misused or exceeded its powers, the authority \\ncommitted an error of law, the authority violated principles of impartiality of \\nthe judiciary, the authority has violated the fundamental rights of individuals. \\nThe Judiciary stands to ensure that all administrative actions are confined to \\nthe limits of the law and examines administrative action to assess whether the \\nauthority has exercised its powers, whether the authority has abused or \\nexceeded its powers, whether the authority has committed an error of law, \\nwhether the authority has violated the principles of natural justice, whether the \\nauthority has infringed the fundamental rights of persons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-2-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度宪法大致规定了五种“特权”令状:人身保护令、调卷令、命令令、现状保证令和禁令。本研究介绍其法律地位,即其适用、程序和适用理由。该研究得出的结论是,在印度,法治是至高无上的,只要偏离了这一至高无上的地位,司法部门就有权进行干预。司法机关应当确保一切行政行为符合法定限度,并考虑采取行政措施来评估机关是否行使了权力、滥用或超越了权力、犯了法律错误、违反了司法公正原则、侵犯了个人的基本权利。司法机构致力确保所有行政行为均受法律所限,并审查行政行为,以评估当局是否行使其权力、当局是否滥用或超越其权力、当局是否犯了法律错误、当局是否违反了自然正义原则、当局是否侵犯了个人的基本权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The prerogative writs - indian perspective
The Constitution of India broadly provides for five kinds of “prerogative” writs: habeas corpus, certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition. This study presents their legal status, namely their application, procedure and grounds for their application. The study concludes that, in India, the rule of law is supreme and judiciary has the right to interfere whenever there is deviation from this supremacy. The judiciary shall ensure that all administrative actions comply with legal limits and consider administrative measures to assess whether the authority has exercised powers, the authority misused or exceeded its powers, the authority committed an error of law, the authority violated principles of impartiality of the judiciary, the authority has violated the fundamental rights of individuals. The Judiciary stands to ensure that all administrative actions are confined to the limits of the law and examines administrative action to assess whether the authority has exercised its powers, whether the authority has abused or exceeded its powers, whether the authority has committed an error of law, whether the authority has violated the principles of natural justice, whether the authority has infringed the fundamental rights of persons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1