基于静态分析的节目质量评价

C. SkandaV., S. S. Prasad, G. R. Dheemanth, N. S. Kumar
{"title":"基于静态分析的节目质量评价","authors":"C. SkandaV., S. S. Prasad, G. R. Dheemanth, N. S. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2019.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's world of automation, there is a growing trend towards automating even the simplest tasks. One area where this trend has not caught up is in the assignment evaluation tasks area in the education sector. Even today, many programs are manually evaluated in tests and exams. Even popular platforms like HackerRank and HackerEarth fall short in many cases as they perform checking only based on the test-cases irrespective of the quality of the code written. This may lead students to learn improper coding practices. In this paper, we present a tool that not only tests a student's program based on test cases dynamically but also evaluates a program statically based on certain rules given by the teacher, thereby automating the process of evaluation and removing any possible bias and error. The main idea of this paper is to demonstrate the application of static analysis in program evaluation based on rules created by the teacher to encourage higher coding standards","PeriodicalId":347086,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Quality of Program Based on Static Analysis\",\"authors\":\"C. SkandaV., S. S. Prasad, G. R. Dheemanth, N. S. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/T4E.2019.00072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today's world of automation, there is a growing trend towards automating even the simplest tasks. One area where this trend has not caught up is in the assignment evaluation tasks area in the education sector. Even today, many programs are manually evaluated in tests and exams. Even popular platforms like HackerRank and HackerEarth fall short in many cases as they perform checking only based on the test-cases irrespective of the quality of the code written. This may lead students to learn improper coding practices. In this paper, we present a tool that not only tests a student's program based on test cases dynamically but also evaluates a program statically based on certain rules given by the teacher, thereby automating the process of evaluation and removing any possible bias and error. The main idea of this paper is to demonstrate the application of static analysis in program evaluation based on rules created by the teacher to encourage higher coding standards\",\"PeriodicalId\":347086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2019.00072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2019.00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今的自动化世界中,即使是最简单的任务也有越来越多的自动化趋势。这一趋势尚未赶上的一个领域是教育部门的作业评估任务领域。即使在今天,许多程序都是在测试和考试中进行人工评估的。即使是像HackerRank和HackerEarth这样的流行平台,在很多情况下也存在不足,因为它们只根据测试用例执行检查,而不考虑所编写代码的质量。这可能会导致学生学习不正确的编码实践。在本文中,我们提出了一个工具,既可以根据测试用例对学生的程序进行动态测试,也可以根据教师给出的一定规则对程序进行静态评估,从而使评估过程自动化,消除任何可能的偏差和错误。本文的主要思想是演示静态分析在程序评估中的应用,基于教师创建的规则,以鼓励更高的编码标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Quality of Program Based on Static Analysis
In today's world of automation, there is a growing trend towards automating even the simplest tasks. One area where this trend has not caught up is in the assignment evaluation tasks area in the education sector. Even today, many programs are manually evaluated in tests and exams. Even popular platforms like HackerRank and HackerEarth fall short in many cases as they perform checking only based on the test-cases irrespective of the quality of the code written. This may lead students to learn improper coding practices. In this paper, we present a tool that not only tests a student's program based on test cases dynamically but also evaluates a program statically based on certain rules given by the teacher, thereby automating the process of evaluation and removing any possible bias and error. The main idea of this paper is to demonstrate the application of static analysis in program evaluation based on rules created by the teacher to encourage higher coding standards
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights into Factors Affecting Success in Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering for Indian Engineering Students using Learning Analytics Rural Health in Digital India: Interactive Simulations for Community Health Workers Heuristic Evaluation and User Experience Redesign of 'Think & Link' Learning Environment – A Case Study Musical Mimicry to Learn Audio Processing OMEGA: A Multiplayer Online Game for Improving User's Meta-Cognitive Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1