大田条件下选择性杀菌剂防治洋葱霜霉病的研究

T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan
{"title":"大田条件下选择性杀菌剂防治洋葱霜霉病的研究","authors":"T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan","doi":"10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control","PeriodicalId":197597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Downy Mildew of Onion Through Selective Fungicides in the Field Condition\",\"authors\":\"T. A. Bhatti, Z. A. Nizamani, Muswar Ali Gadhi, F. Soomro, Raj Kumar, Saeed Ahmed Abro, A. H. Soomro, S. Qazi, Umer ul din Jarwar Abdul Ghani Kandhro, Madiha Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control\",\"PeriodicalId\":197597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38211/joarps.2021.2.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

不同杀菌剂对化学处理洋葱白粉病的防治效果(1、2、3、4组):15株植物的得分分别为0.97、2.89、2.44、2.22,对照为2.33、9.00、10.00、10.33;疾病感染率分别为6.47、20.00、16.30、14.07%,对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;染病叶片/株分别为0.20、2.04、2.38和2.02,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99和4.04。Cabriotop检测结果显示,感染株分别为1.00、2.56、1.89和1.67,对照为2.32、9.00、10.00和10.33;病染率分别为6.67、17.04、12.59、11.11,对照为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;病染叶片分别为0.41、2.22、2.62、2.07,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99、4.04,平均鳞茎重为126.50g。与对照的2.33、9.00、10.00和10.33相比,侵染植株的赖利值分别为0.96、3.33、2.78和3.11;疾病感染率分别为6.42、22.22、18.52、20.74%,对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;侵染叶片分别为0.41、2.22、2.62和2.07,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99和4.04,平均鳞茎重为116.38g,对照为74.34g。延迟加株的侵染株数分别为0.95、2.78、2.56和2.78,对照株数分别为2.33、9.00、10.00和10.33;疾病感染率分别为6.33、18.52、17.04、18.52%,对照组为15.56、60.00、66.67、68.89%;侵染叶片为0.50、2.10、2.48、1.96 /株,对照为1.04、4.36、4.99、4.04/株;平均球茎重量分别为101.63g、106.97g和112.61g,对照组平均球茎重量为107.07g,对照组平均球茎重量为74.34g
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of Downy Mildew of Onion Through Selective Fungicides in the Field Condition
Efficacy of variousfungicides against powdery mildew of onion all chemical treated 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th observation Score observation in plants (out of 15) were0.97, 2.89, 2.44 and 2.22 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.47, 20.00, 16.30 and 14.07% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves/plant 0.20, 2.04, 2.38 and 2.02 against 1.04, 4.36,4.99 and 4.04leaves in control, respectively. The Cabriotop observation resulted in infected plants 1.00, 2.56, 1.89 and 1.67 against 2.32, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.67, 17.04, 12.59 and 11.11 against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control, infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 126.50g.The Relly observation in infected plants 0.96, 3.33, 2.78 and 3.11 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.42, 22.22, 18.52 and 20.74% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.41, 2.22, 2.62 and 2.07 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04 in control, respectively with average bulb weight of 116.38g against 74.34g in control. Defer plus at observation resulted ininfected plants of 0.95, 2.78, 2.56 and 2.78 against 2.33, 9.00, 10.00 and 10.33 in control; disease infection 6.33, 18.52, 17.04 and 18.52% against 15.56, 60.00, 66.67 and 68.89% in control; infected leaves 0.50, 2.10, 2.48 and 1.96 against 1.04, 4.36, 4.99 and 4.04/plant in control; with average bulb weight of 101.63g, 106.97g and 112.61g overall average bulb weight of 107.07g against 74.34g bulb weight on average in control
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioactive compounds, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Attributes of Cordia Sinensis Lam Combining Ability Analysis and Genetic Studies of Stripe Rust Resistance in Bread Wheat Genotypes The Impact of Glucose-induced Priming on Nutrients Accumulation and Certain Primary Attributes of Brassica napus L. Under the Saline Regimes The Impact of Glucose-induced Priming on Nutrients Accumulation and Certain Primary Attributes of Brassica napus L. Under the Saline Regimes Estimation of Hetrosis in F1 Hybrids of Bread Wheat Genotypes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1