不同冲击电流下能量吸收估算MOA仿真模型的实验验证

Yuwei He, Z. Fu, Jian Chen
{"title":"不同冲击电流下能量吸收估算MOA仿真模型的实验验证","authors":"Yuwei He, Z. Fu, Jian Chen","doi":"10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excess energy absorption is an important reason of metal oxide arresters (MOA) failure. Theoretical prediction of MOA failure probability requires the accurate computation of energy absorption in MOA. Several models with good properties in predicting the peak residual voltage have been proposed for the simulation of the dynamic frequency-dependent behavior of MOA, but the performance of these models in estimating the energy absorption is not thoroughly investigated. In this paper, the accuracy of the non-linear resistance model and frequency-dependent models, including the IEEE model, Pinceti-Gianettoni model and Fernandez-Diaz model, in estimating the residual voltage and energy absorption under different impulse currents is investigated experimentally. The energy absorption of MOA under lightning current of 8/20 μs, switching surge current of 30/60 μs, and 1 μs steep current were simulated with different models and compared with the experimentally measured values under corresponding waveform currents. The results show that the frequency-dependent models are accurate in the evaluation of peak residual voltage, but not suitable for the simulation of energy absorption, with a relative error up to 60%, under steep impulse current. The non-linear resistance model shows its poor performance both on peak residual voltage and energy absorption estimation under steep impulse currents. The work of this paper shows that an improved model is necessary for simultaneous accurate prediction of peak residual voltage and energy absorption of MOA under steep impulse currents.","PeriodicalId":155315,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental validation of MOA simulation models for energy absorption estimation under different impulse currents\",\"authors\":\"Yuwei He, Z. Fu, Jian Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Excess energy absorption is an important reason of metal oxide arresters (MOA) failure. Theoretical prediction of MOA failure probability requires the accurate computation of energy absorption in MOA. Several models with good properties in predicting the peak residual voltage have been proposed for the simulation of the dynamic frequency-dependent behavior of MOA, but the performance of these models in estimating the energy absorption is not thoroughly investigated. In this paper, the accuracy of the non-linear resistance model and frequency-dependent models, including the IEEE model, Pinceti-Gianettoni model and Fernandez-Diaz model, in estimating the residual voltage and energy absorption under different impulse currents is investigated experimentally. The energy absorption of MOA under lightning current of 8/20 μs, switching surge current of 30/60 μs, and 1 μs steep current were simulated with different models and compared with the experimentally measured values under corresponding waveform currents. The results show that the frequency-dependent models are accurate in the evaluation of peak residual voltage, but not suitable for the simulation of energy absorption, with a relative error up to 60%, under steep impulse current. The non-linear resistance model shows its poor performance both on peak residual voltage and energy absorption estimation under steep impulse currents. The work of this paper shows that an improved model is necessary for simultaneous accurate prediction of peak residual voltage and energy absorption of MOA under steep impulse currents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

过量的能量吸收是金属氧化物避雷器失效的重要原因。理论预测MOA失效概率需要精确计算MOA的能量吸收。对于MOA的动态频率依赖特性,已经提出了几个具有较好预测峰值剩余电压的模型,但这些模型在估计能量吸收方面的性能并没有得到深入的研究。本文对非线性电阻模型和频率相关模型(包括IEEE模型、pincetii - gianettoni模型和Fernandez-Diaz模型)在不同冲击电流下估计剩余电压和能量吸收的准确性进行了实验研究。采用不同的模型模拟了雷电电流为8/20 μs、开关浪涌电流为30/60 μs和陡坡电流为1 μs时MOA的能量吸收,并与相应波形电流下的实验测量值进行了比较。结果表明,频率相关模型对峰值剩余电压的估计是准确的,但不适合模拟能量吸收,在大冲击电流下的相对误差高达60%。非线性电阻模型在陡冲击电流下的峰值剩余电压估计和能量吸收估计都有较差的性能。本文的工作表明,为了同时准确预测陡冲击电流下MOA的峰值剩余电压和能量吸收,需要改进模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental validation of MOA simulation models for energy absorption estimation under different impulse currents
Excess energy absorption is an important reason of metal oxide arresters (MOA) failure. Theoretical prediction of MOA failure probability requires the accurate computation of energy absorption in MOA. Several models with good properties in predicting the peak residual voltage have been proposed for the simulation of the dynamic frequency-dependent behavior of MOA, but the performance of these models in estimating the energy absorption is not thoroughly investigated. In this paper, the accuracy of the non-linear resistance model and frequency-dependent models, including the IEEE model, Pinceti-Gianettoni model and Fernandez-Diaz model, in estimating the residual voltage and energy absorption under different impulse currents is investigated experimentally. The energy absorption of MOA under lightning current of 8/20 μs, switching surge current of 30/60 μs, and 1 μs steep current were simulated with different models and compared with the experimentally measured values under corresponding waveform currents. The results show that the frequency-dependent models are accurate in the evaluation of peak residual voltage, but not suitable for the simulation of energy absorption, with a relative error up to 60%, under steep impulse current. The non-linear resistance model shows its poor performance both on peak residual voltage and energy absorption estimation under steep impulse currents. The work of this paper shows that an improved model is necessary for simultaneous accurate prediction of peak residual voltage and energy absorption of MOA under steep impulse currents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A laboratory experiment of single machine synchronous islanding using PMUs and Raspberry Pi — A platform for multi-machine islanding Distributed vs. concentrated rapid frequency response provision in future great britain system Analysis of IEEE C37.118 and IEC 61850-90-5 synchrophasor communication frameworks A Review of probabilistic methods for defining reserve requirements DC fault protection strategy considering DC network partition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1