评估埃塞俄比亚古拉格地区莫切土地利用对土壤肥力的影响

Teklil Abadeye, T. Yitbarek, Isreal Zewide, Kibinesh Adimasu
{"title":"评估埃塞俄比亚古拉格地区莫切土地利用对土壤肥力的影响","authors":"Teklil Abadeye, T. Yitbarek, Isreal Zewide, Kibinesh Adimasu","doi":"10.58414/scientifictemper.2023.14.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main reasons for Ethiopia’s declining agricultural production is land use change under poor soil management practices. Hence, in order to evaluate the effects of various land use types on certain soil qualities, research was done on the soils of Cheha district, Gurage zone in Ethiopia’s central highlands. Four different land use types (LUTs) (cultivated, enset, eucalyptus, and wild forest) were used for this study to assess and analyze their response to soil fertility. A total of 48 soil samples (24 undisturbed and 24 disturbed) was collected from the selected LUTs and two different soil depths (SDs) (0-20 and 20-40 cm) with three replications for the laboratory analysis. The results showed that most of the properties of soil physicochemical properties of soil were significantly affected by LUTs, SD, and the interactions. The result showed that the highest sand (43%), silt (46.5%), and clay (30.30%) fractions were observed under forest land (FL), enset farmland (ENFL), and cultivated land (CUL), respectively. Concerning the SD, higher silt (40.9%) and clay (28.3%) were found in the subsurface soils. Except for CUL, textural classes of all LUTs were loamy. The highest (1.37 g cm-3) bulk density was observed under the subsurface soils of CUL and the lowest (1.06 g cm-3) was in the surface soils of FL and ENFL. In contrast to bulk density, total porosity was highest (60.1%) under surface soils of FL and ENFL and the lowest (48.3%) value was observed under subsurface soils of CUL. The combination of two factors influenced the soil pH. The highest value (6.54) and lowermost (4.82) values were found under the surface soils of ENFL and subsoils of EUCL, respectively. Comparatively, the uppermost (7.48%) and lowermost (3.55%) values of organic matter were recorded under the surface soils of FL and subsoils of EUCL. The uppermost (0.37%) and lowermost (0.17%) values of total nitrogen were registered under surface soil and subsoils of FL and EUCL, respectively. The uppermost (22.69 mg kg-1) value of Av.P was registered under superficial soils of ENFL and the lowermost (5.02 mg kg-1) was obtained under a subsurface layer of EUCL. The uppermost (37.96 cmol(+) kg-1) and lowermost (11.90 cmol(+) kg-1) of CEC values were observed under the surface soils of FL and subsoils of EUCL. The uppermost value of exchangeable acidity (1.85 cmol(+) kg-1) was recorded under soils of EUCL. This study showed that different LUTs and SDs have substantial impacts on the status of soil fertility. Soils of FL and ENFLs were relatively more fertile. Increasing eucalyptus tree cover on arable land and intensive farming severely impacted soil fertility which may have increased soil acidity. Appropriate land use and a variety of soil fertility management practices are crucial to address soil fertility loss and acidity issues","PeriodicalId":443629,"journal":{"name":"THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing soil fertility influenced by land use in Moche, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Teklil Abadeye, T. Yitbarek, Isreal Zewide, Kibinesh Adimasu\",\"doi\":\"10.58414/scientifictemper.2023.14.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the main reasons for Ethiopia’s declining agricultural production is land use change under poor soil management practices. Hence, in order to evaluate the effects of various land use types on certain soil qualities, research was done on the soils of Cheha district, Gurage zone in Ethiopia’s central highlands. Four different land use types (LUTs) (cultivated, enset, eucalyptus, and wild forest) were used for this study to assess and analyze their response to soil fertility. A total of 48 soil samples (24 undisturbed and 24 disturbed) was collected from the selected LUTs and two different soil depths (SDs) (0-20 and 20-40 cm) with three replications for the laboratory analysis. The results showed that most of the properties of soil physicochemical properties of soil were significantly affected by LUTs, SD, and the interactions. The result showed that the highest sand (43%), silt (46.5%), and clay (30.30%) fractions were observed under forest land (FL), enset farmland (ENFL), and cultivated land (CUL), respectively. Concerning the SD, higher silt (40.9%) and clay (28.3%) were found in the subsurface soils. Except for CUL, textural classes of all LUTs were loamy. The highest (1.37 g cm-3) bulk density was observed under the subsurface soils of CUL and the lowest (1.06 g cm-3) was in the surface soils of FL and ENFL. In contrast to bulk density, total porosity was highest (60.1%) under surface soils of FL and ENFL and the lowest (48.3%) value was observed under subsurface soils of CUL. The combination of two factors influenced the soil pH. The highest value (6.54) and lowermost (4.82) values were found under the surface soils of ENFL and subsoils of EUCL, respectively. Comparatively, the uppermost (7.48%) and lowermost (3.55%) values of organic matter were recorded under the surface soils of FL and subsoils of EUCL. The uppermost (0.37%) and lowermost (0.17%) values of total nitrogen were registered under surface soil and subsoils of FL and EUCL, respectively. The uppermost (22.69 mg kg-1) value of Av.P was registered under superficial soils of ENFL and the lowermost (5.02 mg kg-1) was obtained under a subsurface layer of EUCL. The uppermost (37.96 cmol(+) kg-1) and lowermost (11.90 cmol(+) kg-1) of CEC values were observed under the surface soils of FL and subsoils of EUCL. The uppermost value of exchangeable acidity (1.85 cmol(+) kg-1) was recorded under soils of EUCL. This study showed that different LUTs and SDs have substantial impacts on the status of soil fertility. Soils of FL and ENFLs were relatively more fertile. Increasing eucalyptus tree cover on arable land and intensive farming severely impacted soil fertility which may have increased soil acidity. Appropriate land use and a variety of soil fertility management practices are crucial to address soil fertility loss and acidity issues\",\"PeriodicalId\":443629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58414/scientifictemper.2023.14.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58414/scientifictemper.2023.14.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃塞俄比亚农业产量下降的主要原因之一是土壤管理不善导致的土地利用变化。因此,为了评估不同土地利用类型对土壤质量的影响,对埃塞俄比亚中部高原古拉格地区切哈地区的土壤进行了研究。本研究利用四种不同的土地利用类型(耕地、林地、桉树和野生森林)来评估和分析它们对土壤肥力的响应。选取2个不同的土壤深度(0-20 cm和20-40 cm),共采集48个土壤样品(24个未扰动和24个扰动),3个重复进行实验室分析。结果表明,土壤的大部分理化性质均受到LUTs、SD及其相互作用的显著影响。结果表明:沙粒(43%)、粉砂(46.5%)和粘土(30.30%)在林地、灌溉区和耕地中含量最高;土壤SD以粉砂质(40.9%)和粘土(28.3%)为主。除CUL外,所有lut的纹理类均为纹理类。CUL地下土壤容重最高(1.37 g cm-3), FL和ENFL表层土壤容重最低(1.06 g cm-3)。与容重相比,全孔隙度在FL和ENFL表层土壤中最高(60.1%),在CUL下层土壤中最低(48.3%)。两个因子共同影响土壤ph值,ENFL表层土壤ph值最高(6.54),EUCL底土ph值最低(4.82)。相比之下,高级区表层土壤有机质含量最高(7.48%),EUCL下层土壤有机质含量最低(3.55%)。全氮含量最高(0.37%)、最低(0.17%)的土壤分别为表层土壤和下层土壤。在ENFL表层土壤中Av.P值最高(22.69 mg kg-1), EUCL次表层土壤中最低(5.02 mg kg-1)。土壤CEC值最高为37.96 cmol(+) kg-1,最低为11.90 cmol(+) kg-1。EUCL土壤的交换性酸度最高值为1.85 cmol(+) kg-1。本研究表明,不同的lut和SDs对土壤肥力状况有显著影响。FL和enfl的土壤相对较肥沃。耕地上桉树盖度的增加和集约化耕作严重影响了土壤肥力,可能导致土壤酸度增加。适当的土地利用和各种土壤肥力管理措施对于解决土壤肥力丧失和酸度问题至关重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing soil fertility influenced by land use in Moche, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia
One of the main reasons for Ethiopia’s declining agricultural production is land use change under poor soil management practices. Hence, in order to evaluate the effects of various land use types on certain soil qualities, research was done on the soils of Cheha district, Gurage zone in Ethiopia’s central highlands. Four different land use types (LUTs) (cultivated, enset, eucalyptus, and wild forest) were used for this study to assess and analyze their response to soil fertility. A total of 48 soil samples (24 undisturbed and 24 disturbed) was collected from the selected LUTs and two different soil depths (SDs) (0-20 and 20-40 cm) with three replications for the laboratory analysis. The results showed that most of the properties of soil physicochemical properties of soil were significantly affected by LUTs, SD, and the interactions. The result showed that the highest sand (43%), silt (46.5%), and clay (30.30%) fractions were observed under forest land (FL), enset farmland (ENFL), and cultivated land (CUL), respectively. Concerning the SD, higher silt (40.9%) and clay (28.3%) were found in the subsurface soils. Except for CUL, textural classes of all LUTs were loamy. The highest (1.37 g cm-3) bulk density was observed under the subsurface soils of CUL and the lowest (1.06 g cm-3) was in the surface soils of FL and ENFL. In contrast to bulk density, total porosity was highest (60.1%) under surface soils of FL and ENFL and the lowest (48.3%) value was observed under subsurface soils of CUL. The combination of two factors influenced the soil pH. The highest value (6.54) and lowermost (4.82) values were found under the surface soils of ENFL and subsoils of EUCL, respectively. Comparatively, the uppermost (7.48%) and lowermost (3.55%) values of organic matter were recorded under the surface soils of FL and subsoils of EUCL. The uppermost (0.37%) and lowermost (0.17%) values of total nitrogen were registered under surface soil and subsoils of FL and EUCL, respectively. The uppermost (22.69 mg kg-1) value of Av.P was registered under superficial soils of ENFL and the lowermost (5.02 mg kg-1) was obtained under a subsurface layer of EUCL. The uppermost (37.96 cmol(+) kg-1) and lowermost (11.90 cmol(+) kg-1) of CEC values were observed under the surface soils of FL and subsoils of EUCL. The uppermost value of exchangeable acidity (1.85 cmol(+) kg-1) was recorded under soils of EUCL. This study showed that different LUTs and SDs have substantial impacts on the status of soil fertility. Soils of FL and ENFLs were relatively more fertile. Increasing eucalyptus tree cover on arable land and intensive farming severely impacted soil fertility which may have increased soil acidity. Appropriate land use and a variety of soil fertility management practices are crucial to address soil fertility loss and acidity issues
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measurement of agricultural productivity and levels of development in the Malaprabha river basin, Karnataka, India Assessing the role of EDTA and SA in mustard under Cd and Pb stress Trichoderma atrobrunneum: In vitro analysis of exoenzyme activity and antagonistic potential against plant pathogen from agricultural fields in the Patna region, India Exploring the therapeutic implications of nanoparticles for liquid tumors: A comprehensive review with special emphasis on green synthesis techniques in the context of Dalton’s lymphoma Nanoparticles as illuminating allies: Advancing diagnostic frontiers in COVID-19- A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1