优化开放政府:数据共享的经济学视角

Todd Sanderson, A. Reeson, P. Box
{"title":"优化开放政府:数据共享的经济学视角","authors":"Todd Sanderson, A. Reeson, P. Box","doi":"10.1145/3326365.3326383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data has value helping individuals, businesses and government make decisions. Sharing government data can, therefore, enhance its value, providing privacy is safeguarded. Open government data can also enhance equity by reducing the information advantage that large businesses increasingly have over smaller competitors and customers. However, there are costs associated with open data. It must be curated and disseminated. Protecting individual privacy may require aggregation or transformation. There are also different ways of sharing data. At its crudest, this may take the form of providing files, in whatever form, on a website. More usefully and at greater cost, sharing data may take the form of machine-readable APIs. Data services also help users draw insights from data, for example by identifying patterns or trends or highlighting the most salient information. These different sharing models incur different costs to government and users. More accessible data with associated services generally increase the potential benefits to users but will come at some cost to government. From an economic perspective, it will be more efficient if this is done once by the government. However, given the limited budget resources of governments it is worth considering how the process of opening government data could be optimized. The objective of this research is to provide a framework to assist decision-makers responsible for open data. A data prioritization index could assess the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of making particular datasets open. The benefits depend on the extent to which data are likely to be used by citizens, or to enhance competition among firms. The costs include the ICT infrastructure requirements and privacy safeguards needed to make the data open. Ultimately the value of open data will grow as artificial intelligence lowers the cost of drawing insights from it. Open data could also reduce the extent to which a small number of large companies are able to profit from monopolizing their data holdings.","PeriodicalId":178287,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Open Government: an economic perspective on data sharing\",\"authors\":\"Todd Sanderson, A. Reeson, P. Box\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3326365.3326383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data has value helping individuals, businesses and government make decisions. Sharing government data can, therefore, enhance its value, providing privacy is safeguarded. Open government data can also enhance equity by reducing the information advantage that large businesses increasingly have over smaller competitors and customers. However, there are costs associated with open data. It must be curated and disseminated. Protecting individual privacy may require aggregation or transformation. There are also different ways of sharing data. At its crudest, this may take the form of providing files, in whatever form, on a website. More usefully and at greater cost, sharing data may take the form of machine-readable APIs. Data services also help users draw insights from data, for example by identifying patterns or trends or highlighting the most salient information. These different sharing models incur different costs to government and users. More accessible data with associated services generally increase the potential benefits to users but will come at some cost to government. From an economic perspective, it will be more efficient if this is done once by the government. However, given the limited budget resources of governments it is worth considering how the process of opening government data could be optimized. The objective of this research is to provide a framework to assist decision-makers responsible for open data. A data prioritization index could assess the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of making particular datasets open. The benefits depend on the extent to which data are likely to be used by citizens, or to enhance competition among firms. The costs include the ICT infrastructure requirements and privacy safeguards needed to make the data open. Ultimately the value of open data will grow as artificial intelligence lowers the cost of drawing insights from it. Open data could also reduce the extent to which a small number of large companies are able to profit from monopolizing their data holdings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

数据在帮助个人、企业和政府做出决策方面具有价值。因此,在隐私得到保障的情况下,共享政府数据可以提高其价值。开放的政府数据还可以通过减少大型企业对小型竞争对手和客户的信息优势来增强公平。然而,开放数据是有成本的。它必须得到策划和传播。保护个人隐私可能需要聚合或转换。共享数据也有不同的方式。最简单的做法是在网站上提供任何形式的文件。共享数据可能采用机器可读api的形式,这更有用,成本也更高。数据服务还帮助用户从数据中获取见解,例如通过识别模式或趋势或突出显示最重要的信息。这些不同的共享模式给政府和用户带来了不同的成本。更容易获得的数据和相关服务通常会增加用户的潜在利益,但会让政府付出一些代价。从经济角度来看,如果由政府一次性完成,效率会更高。然而,在政府预算资源有限的情况下,如何优化政府数据开放的过程是值得思考的问题。本研究的目的是提供一个框架,以协助负责开放数据的决策者。数据优先级指数可以评估开放特定数据集的成本和收益之间的权衡。这些好处取决于公民可能使用数据的程度,或者是为了加强公司之间的竞争。成本包括信息和通信技术基础设施要求和使数据公开所需的隐私保障。最终,随着人工智能降低从中获取见解的成本,开放数据的价值将会增长。开放数据还可以降低少数大公司从垄断数据中获利的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Open Government: an economic perspective on data sharing
Data has value helping individuals, businesses and government make decisions. Sharing government data can, therefore, enhance its value, providing privacy is safeguarded. Open government data can also enhance equity by reducing the information advantage that large businesses increasingly have over smaller competitors and customers. However, there are costs associated with open data. It must be curated and disseminated. Protecting individual privacy may require aggregation or transformation. There are also different ways of sharing data. At its crudest, this may take the form of providing files, in whatever form, on a website. More usefully and at greater cost, sharing data may take the form of machine-readable APIs. Data services also help users draw insights from data, for example by identifying patterns or trends or highlighting the most salient information. These different sharing models incur different costs to government and users. More accessible data with associated services generally increase the potential benefits to users but will come at some cost to government. From an economic perspective, it will be more efficient if this is done once by the government. However, given the limited budget resources of governments it is worth considering how the process of opening government data could be optimized. The objective of this research is to provide a framework to assist decision-makers responsible for open data. A data prioritization index could assess the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of making particular datasets open. The benefits depend on the extent to which data are likely to be used by citizens, or to enhance competition among firms. The costs include the ICT infrastructure requirements and privacy safeguards needed to make the data open. Ultimately the value of open data will grow as artificial intelligence lowers the cost of drawing insights from it. Open data could also reduce the extent to which a small number of large companies are able to profit from monopolizing their data holdings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging Governments in Open Data Policies through Gaming How to Master the "E": Tools for Competence Identification, Provision and Preservation in a Digitalized Public Sector Public Wi-Fi metadata in data-driven urban governance The Impact of Digital Governance on the Business Environment: the Case of Estonian Tax and Customs Board Participation and Citizen Empowerment platform for e-governance: Communal Integration System (SINCO)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1