航空发动机叶片型面参数评价的应用研究

T. Pan, X. He, G. Wu, X. He, X. L. Xu
{"title":"航空发动机叶片型面参数评价的应用研究","authors":"T. Pan, X. He, G. Wu, X. He, X. L. Xu","doi":"10.1049/icp.2021.1314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The geometrical size of the aeroengine blade profile are mainly measured by coordinate measuring machines. And then the parameters are evaluated by software analysis. Now the software for evaluating blade parameters mainly includes products of companies such as Renishaw, Hexagon, Zeiss, and Geomagic. By using the same coordinate measuring machines (CMM) and different software to carry out the comparative experiment of measuring the parameters of model and actual blade with the contour section, the method for experimenting and comparing with the algorithms of the blade profile parameter is proposed. It expounds the general parameters, general algorithms and the magnitude of data discrepancy of measurement software. The experiment results show that Hexagon and Renishaw are more comprehensive than Zeiss and Geomagic in terms of parameter algorithms. On the other hand, the contour of the actual blade is not perfect curve, which leads to errors in measurement, so that the deviation of the evaluation value of the parameters on the actual blade is much larger than that on the model.","PeriodicalId":337028,"journal":{"name":"The 8th International Symposium on Test Automation & Instrumentation (ISTAI 2020)","volume":"2020 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APPLICATION RESEARCH ON EVALUATION OF AERO-ENGINE BLADE PROFILE PARAMETERS\",\"authors\":\"T. Pan, X. He, G. Wu, X. He, X. L. Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/icp.2021.1314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The geometrical size of the aeroengine blade profile are mainly measured by coordinate measuring machines. And then the parameters are evaluated by software analysis. Now the software for evaluating blade parameters mainly includes products of companies such as Renishaw, Hexagon, Zeiss, and Geomagic. By using the same coordinate measuring machines (CMM) and different software to carry out the comparative experiment of measuring the parameters of model and actual blade with the contour section, the method for experimenting and comparing with the algorithms of the blade profile parameter is proposed. It expounds the general parameters, general algorithms and the magnitude of data discrepancy of measurement software. The experiment results show that Hexagon and Renishaw are more comprehensive than Zeiss and Geomagic in terms of parameter algorithms. On the other hand, the contour of the actual blade is not perfect curve, which leads to errors in measurement, so that the deviation of the evaluation value of the parameters on the actual blade is much larger than that on the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 8th International Symposium on Test Automation & Instrumentation (ISTAI 2020)\",\"volume\":\"2020 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 8th International Symposium on Test Automation & Instrumentation (ISTAI 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.1314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 8th International Symposium on Test Automation & Instrumentation (ISTAI 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2021.1314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

航空发动机叶型几何尺寸的测量主要采用三坐标测量机。然后通过软件分析对参数进行评估。目前刀片参数评估软件主要有雷尼绍、海克斯康、蔡司、Geomagic等公司的产品。利用相同的三坐标测量机(CMM)和不同的软件,对模型叶片和实际叶片进行轮廓截面参数测量的对比实验,提出了对叶片轮廓参数的算法进行实验和比较的方法。阐述了测量软件的一般参数、一般算法和数据差异的大小。实验结果表明,Hexagon和Renishaw在参数算法方面比蔡司和Geomagic更全面。另一方面,实际叶片的轮廓不是完美的曲线,导致测量误差,使得实际叶片上的参数评价值的偏差远大于模型上的参数评价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
APPLICATION RESEARCH ON EVALUATION OF AERO-ENGINE BLADE PROFILE PARAMETERS
The geometrical size of the aeroengine blade profile are mainly measured by coordinate measuring machines. And then the parameters are evaluated by software analysis. Now the software for evaluating blade parameters mainly includes products of companies such as Renishaw, Hexagon, Zeiss, and Geomagic. By using the same coordinate measuring machines (CMM) and different software to carry out the comparative experiment of measuring the parameters of model and actual blade with the contour section, the method for experimenting and comparing with the algorithms of the blade profile parameter is proposed. It expounds the general parameters, general algorithms and the magnitude of data discrepancy of measurement software. The experiment results show that Hexagon and Renishaw are more comprehensive than Zeiss and Geomagic in terms of parameter algorithms. On the other hand, the contour of the actual blade is not perfect curve, which leads to errors in measurement, so that the deviation of the evaluation value of the parameters on the actual blade is much larger than that on the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RESEARCH ON HIGH TEMPERATURE DYNAMIC CALIBRATION TECHNOLOGY OF SHIP PRESSURE SENSOR STUDY ON THE NECESSITY OF MEASURING THE ROUNDNESS OF NOZZLE THROAT RESEARCH ON SLAM TECHNOLOGY OF ROBOT BASED ON ROS LARGE JITTER AMPLITUDE CALIBRATION OF SDH TRANSMISSION ANALYZER BY WIDE BAND FM METHOD RESEARCH ON SEMI-PHYSICAL SIMULATION SYSTEM OF HIGH-END CNC MACHINE BASED ON CLOUD PLATFORM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1