法律制度的深刻变化:摩尔多瓦共和国宪法法院使每一个诉讼当事人都有可能提出违宪的例外

Al. Tanase
{"title":"法律制度的深刻变化:摩尔多瓦共和国宪法法院使每一个诉讼当事人都有可能提出违宪的例外","authors":"Al. Tanase","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Moldova no. 2 of 9 \nFebruary 2016 for the interpretation of Article 135 para. (1) letters a) and g) of \nthe Constitution of the Republic of Moldova (exception of unconstitutionality), \nby which it has been decided that the right to raise the exception belongs to all \ncourts of law, respectively to judges who belong to such courts, and the \nchallenge regarding the constitutional review of certain rules which are to be \napplied in the settlement of a case shall be submitted directly to the \nConstitutional Court by the judges/panels of judges in the Supreme Court of \nJustice, courts of appeal and courts, where the case is at issue. Opening to every \nindividual the opportunity to raise the exception of unconstitutionality, the \nexisting mechanism for the protection of human rights has been redefined, \nrepresenting the first significant step towards the introduction of an individual \ncomplaint to the Constitutional Court.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profound changes in the legal system: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova made it possible for every litigant to raise the exception of unconstitutionality\",\"authors\":\"Al. Tanase\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyses the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Moldova no. 2 of 9 \\nFebruary 2016 for the interpretation of Article 135 para. (1) letters a) and g) of \\nthe Constitution of the Republic of Moldova (exception of unconstitutionality), \\nby which it has been decided that the right to raise the exception belongs to all \\ncourts of law, respectively to judges who belong to such courts, and the \\nchallenge regarding the constitutional review of certain rules which are to be \\napplied in the settlement of a case shall be submitted directly to the \\nConstitutional Court by the judges/panels of judges in the Supreme Court of \\nJustice, courts of appeal and courts, where the case is at issue. Opening to every \\nindividual the opportunity to raise the exception of unconstitutionality, the \\nexisting mechanism for the protection of human rights has been redefined, \\nrepresenting the first significant step towards the introduction of an individual \\ncomplaint to the Constitutional Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了摩尔多瓦宪法法院第1号判决。2016年2月9日第2号关于第135条第1款的解释。(1)字母a和g)宪法的摩尔多瓦共和国(违反宪法除外),已经决定权利的提高法律的例外属于所有法庭,法官属于这样的法院,分别和挑战的宪法审查一定的规则应用于解决案件应当提交直接向宪法法院的法官/面板法官在最高法院,上诉法院和有争议案件的法院。对现有的保护人权的机制进行了重新界定,使每个人都有机会提出违宪的例外情况,这是向宪法法院提出个人申诉的第一个重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Profound changes in the legal system: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Moldova made it possible for every litigant to raise the exception of unconstitutionality
This study analyses the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Moldova no. 2 of 9 February 2016 for the interpretation of Article 135 para. (1) letters a) and g) of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova (exception of unconstitutionality), by which it has been decided that the right to raise the exception belongs to all courts of law, respectively to judges who belong to such courts, and the challenge regarding the constitutional review of certain rules which are to be applied in the settlement of a case shall be submitted directly to the Constitutional Court by the judges/panels of judges in the Supreme Court of Justice, courts of appeal and courts, where the case is at issue. Opening to every individual the opportunity to raise the exception of unconstitutionality, the existing mechanism for the protection of human rights has been redefined, representing the first significant step towards the introduction of an individual complaint to the Constitutional Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1