{"title":"测试基于部分重构的传感器读取设计","authors":"C. Ibala, K. Arshak","doi":"10.1109/SAS.2009.4801812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to present the methodology and tools used to debug a system comprising a HDL, microprocessor and Rocket I/O in a Partial Reconfiguration flow for sensor reading. The complexities of this system make it impossible to use a simple simulation tool such as Modelsim to assess the top level design functionality. The Bus Macros (BM) that interface between the static region and the reconfigurable region of the top level design make it impossible, as there is no simulation model for them. In general, 30% of the development time is taken by design and 70% by the test of the design functionalities. But many factors tend to increase testing time. The following are some of them: important signals are embedded deep in logic, design parts run at different speeds, so the computer screen cannot show all the data in different clock domains at the same time; the simulation time is too long; the design works in simulation but it does not work in hardware, and so on. This paper will present a practical case and the strategy used to debug it. The following software are used for these tests: ISE (Integrated Software Environment) 9.2 Service Pack 4 with the Partial Reconfiguration layout PR7, XPS (Xilinx Platform Studio) 9.2 Service Pack 2, PlanAhead 10.1.6, Chipscope 9.2 Service Pack 4 and two Virtex-5 boards.","PeriodicalId":410885,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing a Partial Reconfiguration based design for sensor reading\",\"authors\":\"C. Ibala, K. Arshak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SAS.2009.4801812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to present the methodology and tools used to debug a system comprising a HDL, microprocessor and Rocket I/O in a Partial Reconfiguration flow for sensor reading. The complexities of this system make it impossible to use a simple simulation tool such as Modelsim to assess the top level design functionality. The Bus Macros (BM) that interface between the static region and the reconfigurable region of the top level design make it impossible, as there is no simulation model for them. In general, 30% of the development time is taken by design and 70% by the test of the design functionalities. But many factors tend to increase testing time. The following are some of them: important signals are embedded deep in logic, design parts run at different speeds, so the computer screen cannot show all the data in different clock domains at the same time; the simulation time is too long; the design works in simulation but it does not work in hardware, and so on. This paper will present a practical case and the strategy used to debug it. The following software are used for these tests: ISE (Integrated Software Environment) 9.2 Service Pack 4 with the Partial Reconfiguration layout PR7, XPS (Xilinx Platform Studio) 9.2 Service Pack 2, PlanAhead 10.1.6, Chipscope 9.2 Service Pack 4 and two Virtex-5 boards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2009.4801812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2009.4801812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文的目的是介绍用于调试由HDL,微处理器和Rocket I/O组成的系统的方法和工具,用于传感器读取的部分重构流程。该系统的复杂性使得不可能使用简单的仿真工具(如Modelsim)来评估顶层设计功能。在顶层设计的静态区域和可重构区域之间的接口总线宏(BM)使其不可能实现,因为没有针对它们的仿真模型。一般来说,30%的开发时间用于设计,70%用于测试设计功能。但许多因素往往会增加测试时间。主要有:重要信号嵌入逻辑深处,设计部件运行速度不同,计算机屏幕无法同时显示不同时钟域的所有数据;仿真时间过长;该设计可用于仿真,但不能用于硬件,等等。本文将给出一个实际案例和调试策略。这些测试使用以下软件:ISE(集成软件环境)9.2 Service Pack 4(带有部分重新配置布局PR7)、XPS (Xilinx Platform Studio) 9.2 Service Pack 2、PlanAhead 10.1.6、Chipscope 9.2 Service Pack 4和两块Virtex-5板。
Testing a Partial Reconfiguration based design for sensor reading
The aim of this paper is to present the methodology and tools used to debug a system comprising a HDL, microprocessor and Rocket I/O in a Partial Reconfiguration flow for sensor reading. The complexities of this system make it impossible to use a simple simulation tool such as Modelsim to assess the top level design functionality. The Bus Macros (BM) that interface between the static region and the reconfigurable region of the top level design make it impossible, as there is no simulation model for them. In general, 30% of the development time is taken by design and 70% by the test of the design functionalities. But many factors tend to increase testing time. The following are some of them: important signals are embedded deep in logic, design parts run at different speeds, so the computer screen cannot show all the data in different clock domains at the same time; the simulation time is too long; the design works in simulation but it does not work in hardware, and so on. This paper will present a practical case and the strategy used to debug it. The following software are used for these tests: ISE (Integrated Software Environment) 9.2 Service Pack 4 with the Partial Reconfiguration layout PR7, XPS (Xilinx Platform Studio) 9.2 Service Pack 2, PlanAhead 10.1.6, Chipscope 9.2 Service Pack 4 and two Virtex-5 boards.