评估图形用户界面屏幕的布局:数值计算机模型的验证

A. Parush, Ronen Nadir, A. Shtub
{"title":"评估图形用户界面屏幕的布局:数值计算机模型的验证","authors":"A. Parush, Ronen Nadir, A. Shtub","doi":"10.1207/s15327590ijhc1004_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We developed a numerical model for evaluation of graphical user interface (GUI) screens. The model consists of design guidelines concerning screen factors--element size, local density, alignment, and grouping--and produces a complexity score for a given screen. The complexity predictions of the model were examined in a fully factorial experimental design in which GUI screens with all combinations of factors were shown to human users. We measured participants' search times for given elements on all screens, and participants rated their pair-wise preferences of those screens. Overall, very well designed screens resulted in shorter search times and high subjective preference. The combination of poor alignment and poor local density had the strongest adverse effect on search time. Alignment and grouping were found to have more influence on subjective preference. Weights derived from the subjective judgments were introduced into the model and a significant correlation was found between model predictions and se...","PeriodicalId":208962,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Layout of Graphical User Interface Screens: Validation of a Numerical Computerized Model\",\"authors\":\"A. Parush, Ronen Nadir, A. Shtub\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/s15327590ijhc1004_3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We developed a numerical model for evaluation of graphical user interface (GUI) screens. The model consists of design guidelines concerning screen factors--element size, local density, alignment, and grouping--and produces a complexity score for a given screen. The complexity predictions of the model were examined in a fully factorial experimental design in which GUI screens with all combinations of factors were shown to human users. We measured participants' search times for given elements on all screens, and participants rated their pair-wise preferences of those screens. Overall, very well designed screens resulted in shorter search times and high subjective preference. The combination of poor alignment and poor local density had the strongest adverse effect on search time. Alignment and grouping were found to have more influence on subjective preference. Weights derived from the subjective judgments were introduced into the model and a significant correlation was found between model predictions and se...\",\"PeriodicalId\":208962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1004_3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1004_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

我们开发了一个评估图形用户界面(GUI)屏幕的数值模型。该模型包含有关屏幕因素的设计准则——元素大小、局部密度、对齐和分组——并为给定的屏幕生成复杂性评分。模型的复杂性预测在全因子实验设计中进行了检查,其中GUI屏幕与所有因素组合显示给人类用户。我们测量了参与者在所有屏幕上对给定元素的搜索时间,参与者对这些屏幕的配对偏好进行了评分。总体而言,设计良好的屏幕可以缩短搜索时间,提高主观偏好。差对准和低局部密度对搜索时间的不利影响最大。一致性和分组对主观偏好的影响更大。在模型中引入主观判断的权重,发现模型预测结果与实际情况之间存在显著的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Layout of Graphical User Interface Screens: Validation of a Numerical Computerized Model
We developed a numerical model for evaluation of graphical user interface (GUI) screens. The model consists of design guidelines concerning screen factors--element size, local density, alignment, and grouping--and produces a complexity score for a given screen. The complexity predictions of the model were examined in a fully factorial experimental design in which GUI screens with all combinations of factors were shown to human users. We measured participants' search times for given elements on all screens, and participants rated their pair-wise preferences of those screens. Overall, very well designed screens resulted in shorter search times and high subjective preference. The combination of poor alignment and poor local density had the strongest adverse effect on search time. Alignment and grouping were found to have more influence on subjective preference. Weights derived from the subjective judgments were introduced into the model and a significant correlation was found between model predictions and se...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability Inspection by Metaphors of Human Thinking Compared to Heuristic Evaluation Templates for Search Queries: A User-Centered Feature for Improving Web Search Tools A Corporate Style Guide That Includes Domain Knowledge Identification of an Acceptable Mixture of Key and Speech Inputs in Bimodal Interfaces Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1