土著土地划界、记忆与遗忘的时间框架

R. Osowski
{"title":"土著土地划界、记忆与遗忘的时间框架","authors":"R. Osowski","doi":"10.5433/2176-6665.2017V22N2P320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, indigenous peoples have constitutionally guaranteed their original right to the lands they traditionally occupy, endorsing the institute of indigenate. However, the Supreme Federal Court has been restricting this right by establishing the so-called time frame for demarcation of indigenous lands and, more recently, the Executive with the approval of the AGU Opinion, which intends to link the entire Federal Public Administration to this understanding. These actions contradict the conclusions of the National Truth Commission, which pointed to a systematic picture of forced evictions and expulsions in the period preceding the 1988 Constitution and neglect the transitional mechanisms for the restoration of truth and the rescue of memory, representing the implementation of true forgetfulness policy by the Brazilian State.","PeriodicalId":187793,"journal":{"name":"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O Marco Temporal para demarcação de Terras Indígenas, memória e esquecimento\",\"authors\":\"R. Osowski\",\"doi\":\"10.5433/2176-6665.2017V22N2P320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, indigenous peoples have constitutionally guaranteed their original right to the lands they traditionally occupy, endorsing the institute of indigenate. However, the Supreme Federal Court has been restricting this right by establishing the so-called time frame for demarcation of indigenous lands and, more recently, the Executive with the approval of the AGU Opinion, which intends to link the entire Federal Public Administration to this understanding. These actions contradict the conclusions of the National Truth Commission, which pointed to a systematic picture of forced evictions and expulsions in the period preceding the 1988 Constitution and neglect the transitional mechanisms for the restoration of truth and the rescue of memory, representing the implementation of true forgetfulness policy by the Brazilian State.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2017V22N2P320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2017V22N2P320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

今天,土著人民在宪法上保障了他们对他们传统上占有的土地的原始权利,赞同土著制度。然而,联邦最高法院一直在限制这一权利,规定了所谓的土著土地划界的时限,最近,行政当局批准了AGU的意见,该意见打算将整个联邦公共行政部门与这项谅解联系起来。这些行动与国家真相委员会的结论相矛盾,该委员会指出,在1988年《宪法》颁布之前的时期,有系统地出现了强迫驱逐和驱逐的情况,并且忽视了恢复真相和拯救记忆的过渡机制,这代表巴西国家执行了真正的遗忘政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O Marco Temporal para demarcação de Terras Indígenas, memória e esquecimento
Today, indigenous peoples have constitutionally guaranteed their original right to the lands they traditionally occupy, endorsing the institute of indigenate. However, the Supreme Federal Court has been restricting this right by establishing the so-called time frame for demarcation of indigenous lands and, more recently, the Executive with the approval of the AGU Opinion, which intends to link the entire Federal Public Administration to this understanding. These actions contradict the conclusions of the National Truth Commission, which pointed to a systematic picture of forced evictions and expulsions in the period preceding the 1988 Constitution and neglect the transitional mechanisms for the restoration of truth and the rescue of memory, representing the implementation of true forgetfulness policy by the Brazilian State.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
El Pueblo como Comunidad de Afectos. Demanda Social y Desborde de la Democracia Liberal en la Teoría Política Populista Pobres e Miseráveis? Preconceitos Contra Povos Indígenas na Região do Alto Rio Negro (AM) A linguagem Política na Era Digital: O Populismo de Matteo Salvini na Itália O Povo como Categoria Política no Pensamento de Jacques Rancière e Ernesto Laclau As Políticas do Olhar: Um Diálogo Entre a Sociologia do Conhecimento de Karl Mannheim e a Epistemologia Feminista 'High Tech' de Donna Haraway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1