{"title":"1999-2019年智利建筑教学。项目实践的生态潜力和集体政治意识","authors":"Macarena Paz Barrientos Díaz, Rodrigo Lagos Vergara","doi":"10.14198/i2.20131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, the higher education system has visibly tended to standardise university parameters and this process has also affected the internal functioning of Chilean architecture schools. Nevertheless, the political and collective sense reflected in the demands of the new student generation has challenged public policy and the discipline’s pedagogy. In a context of institutional inertia, architecture schools have failed to show reactivity and have not always responded to students’ concerns in a thoughtful and purposeful way. We can observe, however, three pedagogical actions in Chile which – following a radical line proper to the sixties – challenge the normative thoughts, thus questioning and reorganising disciplinary aspects. In so doing, they lead to a rethinking of the ecological potential of the training communities. In such cases, teaching is understood as a central practice, relying on a different relationship between teachers and students. They mix practice with research as they seek to strengthen the collective idea of a community through the academic exercise of a project. In this article, we describe and analyse the conditions that allow these pedagogical actions to emerge and the ecological potential of practice, as they bring about a political and collective meaning that can re-signify the architectural discipline via training.","PeriodicalId":403203,"journal":{"name":"i2 Investigación e Innovación en Arquitectura y Territorio","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enseñanza de la arquitectura en Chile, 1999-2019. Potencial ecológico y sentido político colectivo de las prácticas del proyecto\",\"authors\":\"Macarena Paz Barrientos Díaz, Rodrigo Lagos Vergara\",\"doi\":\"10.14198/i2.20131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last two decades, the higher education system has visibly tended to standardise university parameters and this process has also affected the internal functioning of Chilean architecture schools. Nevertheless, the political and collective sense reflected in the demands of the new student generation has challenged public policy and the discipline’s pedagogy. In a context of institutional inertia, architecture schools have failed to show reactivity and have not always responded to students’ concerns in a thoughtful and purposeful way. We can observe, however, three pedagogical actions in Chile which – following a radical line proper to the sixties – challenge the normative thoughts, thus questioning and reorganising disciplinary aspects. In so doing, they lead to a rethinking of the ecological potential of the training communities. In such cases, teaching is understood as a central practice, relying on a different relationship between teachers and students. They mix practice with research as they seek to strengthen the collective idea of a community through the academic exercise of a project. In this article, we describe and analyse the conditions that allow these pedagogical actions to emerge and the ecological potential of practice, as they bring about a political and collective meaning that can re-signify the architectural discipline via training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"i2 Investigación e Innovación en Arquitectura y Territorio\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"i2 Investigación e Innovación en Arquitectura y Territorio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14198/i2.20131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"i2 Investigación e Innovación en Arquitectura y Territorio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/i2.20131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enseñanza de la arquitectura en Chile, 1999-2019. Potencial ecológico y sentido político colectivo de las prácticas del proyecto
Over the last two decades, the higher education system has visibly tended to standardise university parameters and this process has also affected the internal functioning of Chilean architecture schools. Nevertheless, the political and collective sense reflected in the demands of the new student generation has challenged public policy and the discipline’s pedagogy. In a context of institutional inertia, architecture schools have failed to show reactivity and have not always responded to students’ concerns in a thoughtful and purposeful way. We can observe, however, three pedagogical actions in Chile which – following a radical line proper to the sixties – challenge the normative thoughts, thus questioning and reorganising disciplinary aspects. In so doing, they lead to a rethinking of the ecological potential of the training communities. In such cases, teaching is understood as a central practice, relying on a different relationship between teachers and students. They mix practice with research as they seek to strengthen the collective idea of a community through the academic exercise of a project. In this article, we describe and analyse the conditions that allow these pedagogical actions to emerge and the ecological potential of practice, as they bring about a political and collective meaning that can re-signify the architectural discipline via training.