由精神兴奋剂、合成卡西酮或可卡因引起的强迫症:一项系统回顾

I. Fedotov, B. Y. Volodin, V. Novikov, E. V. Leonov, D. Shustov
{"title":"由精神兴奋剂、合成卡西酮或可卡因引起的强迫症:一项系统回顾","authors":"I. Fedotov, B. Y. Volodin, V. Novikov, E. V. Leonov, D. Shustov","doi":"10.33920/med-01-2306-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to summarize the available data on the frequency of occurrence, clinical features, predictors of prognosis, and effective approaches to the treatment of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders associated with influence of cocaine (code 6C45.72 according to ICD-11), psychostimulants (6C46.73), and synthetic cathinones (6C47.72). The analysis of scientific publications in the eLibrary, CNKI, PubMed, and Scopus databases was performed with keyword search. In accordance with the PRISMA recommendations, 12 articles were selected and included in the analysis. No articles with data on synthetic cathinones have been found. It has been found that the misuse of amphetamine increases the risk of OCD by about 3 times, methamphetamine — by 4 times, cocaine — by 2.5 times. In the presence of additional comorbidity, this risk increases even more: in HIV infection — by 13 times, in the presence of induced psychoses in the anamnesis — by 12 times. The initial presence of OCD also increases the risk of developing addictions. Such mutual influence may be associated with the overlap of these disorders at genetic level (the relative contribution of these factors is estimated at 56–68 %), at neural circuits level (a decrease in the connectivity of the orbitofrontal cortex and in D2‑dopamine activity in the striatum are characteristic of both disorders), and at a behavioral level (both disorders are characterized by a decrease in cognitive flexibility in the model of probabilistic reversal learning). Comorbidity of OCD and addictions deteriorates the social functioning of patients, but increases the duration of remissions. To improve the effectiveness of the treatment of such conditions, combined treatment, aimed at both OCD and addiction, is required. The clinical picture of OCD induced by the use of the studied group of substances may differ in the greater severity of obsessions of contrast contents and compulsive counting. Socio-demographic predictors of the risk of its occurrence were not found.","PeriodicalId":447580,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obsessive-compulsive disorder induced by psychostimulants, synthetic cathinones, or cocaine: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"I. Fedotov, B. Y. Volodin, V. Novikov, E. V. Leonov, D. Shustov\",\"doi\":\"10.33920/med-01-2306-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to summarize the available data on the frequency of occurrence, clinical features, predictors of prognosis, and effective approaches to the treatment of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders associated with influence of cocaine (code 6C45.72 according to ICD-11), psychostimulants (6C46.73), and synthetic cathinones (6C47.72). The analysis of scientific publications in the eLibrary, CNKI, PubMed, and Scopus databases was performed with keyword search. In accordance with the PRISMA recommendations, 12 articles were selected and included in the analysis. No articles with data on synthetic cathinones have been found. It has been found that the misuse of amphetamine increases the risk of OCD by about 3 times, methamphetamine — by 4 times, cocaine — by 2.5 times. In the presence of additional comorbidity, this risk increases even more: in HIV infection — by 13 times, in the presence of induced psychoses in the anamnesis — by 12 times. The initial presence of OCD also increases the risk of developing addictions. Such mutual influence may be associated with the overlap of these disorders at genetic level (the relative contribution of these factors is estimated at 56–68 %), at neural circuits level (a decrease in the connectivity of the orbitofrontal cortex and in D2‑dopamine activity in the striatum are characteristic of both disorders), and at a behavioral level (both disorders are characterized by a decrease in cognitive flexibility in the model of probabilistic reversal learning). Comorbidity of OCD and addictions deteriorates the social functioning of patients, but increases the duration of remissions. To improve the effectiveness of the treatment of such conditions, combined treatment, aimed at both OCD and addiction, is required. The clinical picture of OCD induced by the use of the studied group of substances may differ in the greater severity of obsessions of contrast contents and compulsive counting. Socio-demographic predictors of the risk of its occurrence were not found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2306-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik nevrologii, psihiatrii i nejrohirurgii (Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-01-2306-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是对文献进行系统回顾,以总结与可卡因(ICD-11代码6C45.72)、精神兴奋剂(6C46.73)和合成卡西酮(6C47.72)影响相关的强迫症及相关疾病的发生频率、临床特征、预后预测因素和有效治疗方法等方面的现有数据。通过关键词搜索对图书馆、中国知网、PubMed和Scopus数据库中的科学出版物进行分析。根据PRISMA的建议,选择了12篇文章并将其纳入分析。没有发现含有合成卡西酮数据的文章。研究发现,滥用安非他明会使患强迫症的风险增加约3倍,甲基苯丙胺增加4倍,可卡因增加2.5倍。在存在其他合并症的情况下,这一风险增加得更多:在感染艾滋病毒的情况下,这一风险增加了13倍,在健忘症中存在诱发性精神病的情况下,这一风险增加了12倍。最初出现的强迫症也会增加发展成成瘾的风险。这种相互影响可能与这些疾病在遗传水平上的重叠有关(这些因素的相对贡献估计为56% - 68%),在神经回路水平上(眶额叶皮层连通性下降和纹状体中D2 -多巴胺活性下降是这两种疾病的特征),以及在行为水平上(这两种疾病的特征是在概率反转学习模型中认知灵活性下降)。强迫症和成瘾的合并症恶化了患者的社会功能,但增加了缓解的持续时间。为了提高治疗这种情况的有效性,需要针对强迫症和成瘾的联合治疗。使用所研究的物质引起的强迫症的临床表现可能在对比内容和强迫计数的更严重程度上有所不同。未发现其发生风险的社会人口学预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obsessive-compulsive disorder induced by psychostimulants, synthetic cathinones, or cocaine: a systematic review
The aim of the article is to conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to summarize the available data on the frequency of occurrence, clinical features, predictors of prognosis, and effective approaches to the treatment of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders associated with influence of cocaine (code 6C45.72 according to ICD-11), psychostimulants (6C46.73), and synthetic cathinones (6C47.72). The analysis of scientific publications in the eLibrary, CNKI, PubMed, and Scopus databases was performed with keyword search. In accordance with the PRISMA recommendations, 12 articles were selected and included in the analysis. No articles with data on synthetic cathinones have been found. It has been found that the misuse of amphetamine increases the risk of OCD by about 3 times, methamphetamine — by 4 times, cocaine — by 2.5 times. In the presence of additional comorbidity, this risk increases even more: in HIV infection — by 13 times, in the presence of induced psychoses in the anamnesis — by 12 times. The initial presence of OCD also increases the risk of developing addictions. Such mutual influence may be associated with the overlap of these disorders at genetic level (the relative contribution of these factors is estimated at 56–68 %), at neural circuits level (a decrease in the connectivity of the orbitofrontal cortex and in D2‑dopamine activity in the striatum are characteristic of both disorders), and at a behavioral level (both disorders are characterized by a decrease in cognitive flexibility in the model of probabilistic reversal learning). Comorbidity of OCD and addictions deteriorates the social functioning of patients, but increases the duration of remissions. To improve the effectiveness of the treatment of such conditions, combined treatment, aimed at both OCD and addiction, is required. The clinical picture of OCD induced by the use of the studied group of substances may differ in the greater severity of obsessions of contrast contents and compulsive counting. Socio-demographic predictors of the risk of its occurrence were not found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etiology and pathogenesis of mental disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis: anxiety, psychotic, and personality disorders, chemical addictions, pathological affect Neurosurgical approach to the treatment of otorhinogenic brain abscess (a clinical case) Role of neurotrophic growth factors in vincristine polyneuropathy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Ultrasound assessment of blood flow in the median nerve in normal conditions and in carpal tunnel syndrome A correlation between anxiety-depressive symptoms and immune-metabolic parameters in patients with mixed anxiety and depressive disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1