怀特海哲学中关于上帝的语言——对怀特海《上帝论》的分析与评价

Palmyre M. F. Oomen
{"title":"怀特海哲学中关于上帝的语言——对怀特海《上帝论》的分析与评价","authors":"Palmyre M. F. Oomen","doi":"10.5406/processstudies.48.2.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The way Whitehead speaks of God in his “philosophy of organism,” and the evaluation thereof, is the subject of this article. The background of this issue is the position—broadly shared in theology, and here represented by Aquinas—that one should not speak “carelessly” about God. Does Whitehead violate this rule, or does his language for God express God’s otherness and relatedness to the world in a new, intriguing way? In order to answer this question, an introduction into Whitehead’s philosophy is given, and especially into his category of existence, the “actual entity.” For Whitehead, God is an actual entity, and so is the most trivial puff of existence. His perception of the similarity and greater dissimilarity between God and the worldly actual entities (and clusters thereof) is analyzed. In the main and final section of this article, these insights are used as tools to decrypt Whitehead’s God-language. Here, I compare the status of Whitehead’s and Aquinas’s statements about God, discuss Whitehead’s ideas concerning the analogical character of concrete language, and argue that in Whitehead’s philosophy too there is no discourse about God without a shift or breakdown of the “ordinary” meaning of language.","PeriodicalId":315123,"journal":{"name":"Process Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language about God in Whitehead’s Philosophy: An Analysis and Evaluation of Whitehead’s God-Talk\",\"authors\":\"Palmyre M. F. Oomen\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/processstudies.48.2.0198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The way Whitehead speaks of God in his “philosophy of organism,” and the evaluation thereof, is the subject of this article. The background of this issue is the position—broadly shared in theology, and here represented by Aquinas—that one should not speak “carelessly” about God. Does Whitehead violate this rule, or does his language for God express God’s otherness and relatedness to the world in a new, intriguing way? In order to answer this question, an introduction into Whitehead’s philosophy is given, and especially into his category of existence, the “actual entity.” For Whitehead, God is an actual entity, and so is the most trivial puff of existence. His perception of the similarity and greater dissimilarity between God and the worldly actual entities (and clusters thereof) is analyzed. In the main and final section of this article, these insights are used as tools to decrypt Whitehead’s God-language. Here, I compare the status of Whitehead’s and Aquinas’s statements about God, discuss Whitehead’s ideas concerning the analogical character of concrete language, and argue that in Whitehead’s philosophy too there is no discourse about God without a shift or breakdown of the “ordinary” meaning of language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/processstudies.48.2.0198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/processstudies.48.2.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主题是怀特海在他的“有机体哲学”中谈论上帝的方式及其评价。这个问题的背景是神学中广泛共享的立场,在这里由阿奎那代表,一个人不应该“漫不经心地”谈论上帝。是怀特黑德违反了这条规则,还是他对上帝的语言以一种新的、有趣的方式表达了上帝与世界的差异性和相关性?为了回答这个问题,对怀特黑德的哲学进行了介绍,特别是对他的存在范畴——“实际实体”进行了介绍。对怀特黑德来说,上帝是一个真实的实体,也是最微不足道的存在。分析了他对上帝与世俗实体(及其集群)之间的相似性和更大差异性的看法。在本文的主要部分和最后一部分,这些见解被用作解密怀特黑德的上帝语言的工具。在这里,我比较了怀特海和阿奎那关于上帝的陈述的地位,讨论了怀特海关于具体语言的类比特征的观点,并认为在怀特海的哲学中,如果没有对语言的“普通”意义的转变或破坏,就没有关于上帝的论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Language about God in Whitehead’s Philosophy: An Analysis and Evaluation of Whitehead’s God-Talk
The way Whitehead speaks of God in his “philosophy of organism,” and the evaluation thereof, is the subject of this article. The background of this issue is the position—broadly shared in theology, and here represented by Aquinas—that one should not speak “carelessly” about God. Does Whitehead violate this rule, or does his language for God express God’s otherness and relatedness to the world in a new, intriguing way? In order to answer this question, an introduction into Whitehead’s philosophy is given, and especially into his category of existence, the “actual entity.” For Whitehead, God is an actual entity, and so is the most trivial puff of existence. His perception of the similarity and greater dissimilarity between God and the worldly actual entities (and clusters thereof) is analyzed. In the main and final section of this article, these insights are used as tools to decrypt Whitehead’s God-language. Here, I compare the status of Whitehead’s and Aquinas’s statements about God, discuss Whitehead’s ideas concerning the analogical character of concrete language, and argue that in Whitehead’s philosophy too there is no discourse about God without a shift or breakdown of the “ordinary” meaning of language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Whitehead's Ethics: Fill in the Blanks From a Philosophy of Evolution to a Philosophy of Organism Standing Firm in the Flux: On Whitehead's Eternal Objects Starting With Whitehead: Raising Children to Thrive in Treacherous Times The Open Future: Why Future Contingents Are All False
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1